| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 207, 2025
The 3rd International Conference on Animal Research for Eco-Friendly Livestock Industry (3rd ICARELI 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Food Safety and Security of Animal Resources | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202520704003 | |
| Published online | 24 December 2025 | |
Influence of beef retail cuts on the quality, sensory, and color beef floss: A comparison between silverside and chuck
1 Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
2 Research group of Food Technology of Animal Origin, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia,
3 Research Group of Research and Development Center for Food, Nutrition and Public Health, Research and Community Service (LPPM), Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
This study evaluates the influence of different beef retail cuts on the chemical composition, color attributes, and sensory acceptability of traditional beef floss. The differences in this research treatment were the location of retail cut P1 (silverside) and P2 (Chuck), each treatment replicated in five batches, each batch consisting of 3 replicates. The sensory attributes observed including color, texture, and overall acceptability, were significant, but not significant on aroma and aftertaste. The differences in retail cuts influence the chemical composition, especially in moisture, fat, and protein. There were also contributions on instrumental color measurements were higher lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) values on P2 compared to P1, suggesting enhanced visual appeal. These findings suggest that chuck cut (P2) is more favorable for producing high-quality, visually appealing, and consumer-accepted beef floss.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

