Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 237, 2026
2026 8th International Conference on Biotechnology and Biomedicine (ICBB 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Biomaterials, Medical Devices and Biomedical Engineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623703005 | |
| Published online | 10 June 2026 | |
- Siegel RL, Miler KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer JClin 69:7–34 [Google Scholar]
- Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM et al (2015) Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: a systematic review. JAMA 314:1615–1634 [Google Scholar]
- Gennisson JL, Thomas D, Mathias F, Michael T (2013) Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:487–495 [Google Scholar]
- Su Y, et al (2011) Automatic detection and classification of breast tumors in ultrasonic images using texture and morphological features. Open Med Inform J 5:26–33 [Google Scholar]
- Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, Ou B, Wen YL, Luo BM (2010) Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale. Acad Radiol 17:1227–1233 [Google Scholar]
- Saracco A, Szabó BK, Aspelin P et al (2012) Differentiation between benign and malignant breast tumors using kinetic features of real-time harmonic contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Acta Radiol 53:382–388 [Google Scholar]
- Stanzani D, Chala LF, Barros ND, Cerri GG, Chammas MC (2014) Can Doppler or contrast- enhanced ultrasound analysis add diagnostically important information about the nature of breast lesions? Clinics 69:87–92 [Google Scholar]
- Kondo S, et al (2017) Computer-aided diagnosis of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with perflubutane microbubbles. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36:1427–1437 [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, et al (2019) A deep learning approach for targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based prostate cancer detection. IEEE ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 16:1794–1801 [Google Scholar]
- Rizzo G, et al (2017) Bayesian quantification of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images with adaptive inclusion of an irreversible component. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36:1027–1036 [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, et al (2021) Deep learning in medical ultrasound image analysis: a review. IEEE Access 9:54310–54324 [Google Scholar]
- Liu K, et al (2017) Targeting the vasculature in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: starving versus normalizing blood supply. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 8:98 [Google Scholar]
- Dietrich CF, et al (2023) EFSUMB technical review update 2023: dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for tumor perfusion quantification. Ultraschall Med 44:1–18 [Google Scholar]
- Rognin NG, et al (2010) Parametric imaging for characterizing focal liver lesions in contrast- enhanced ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 57:2503–2511 [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, Qin XC, Luo Y, Li YZ, Zhou X (2015) Efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound washout rate in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma differentiation. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:1553–1560 [Google Scholar]
- Wan P, et al (2021) Hierarchical temporal attention network for thyroid nodule recognition using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 40:1646–1660 [Google Scholar]
- Tang MX, et al (2011) Quantitative contrast- enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability. Interface Focus 1:520–539 [Google Scholar]
- Strobel D, et al (2008) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions: diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice. Ultraschall Med 29:499–505 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.