Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 145, 2024
International Scientific Forestry Forum 2024: Forest Ecosystems as Global Resource of the Biosphere: Calls, Threats, Solutions (Forestry Forum 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03046 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Timber Industry and Mechanization of the Forestry Complex | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414503046 | |
Published online | 28 November 2024 |
Method of testing building models and their engineering systems for seismic impact
1 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Moscow, Russia
2 Branch of the North Caucasus Federal University, Pyatigorsk, Russia
3 Institute of Railway Track, Construction and Structures, Russian University of Transport (MIIT), Moscow, Russia
* Corresponding author: abovyan_1958@mail.ru
Methods of experimental modeling of seismic impact on buildings and their models under force im-pacts, including the stability of building envelope systems, characters and basic parameters that correspond to loads occurring during real earthquakes are considered. The main methods of seismic impact on buildings and structures were analyzed using seismic platforms of software control, directed powerful underground explosion and vibration machines. The advantage of the vibration method is proved, which allows relatively fast and easy and low-cost testing of both full-scale buildings and structures, as well as their models. Experimental installation and method of testing of buildings and their models for seismic impact, excited with the help of simultaneously acting several vibration machines, are presented. Oscillograms of superposition of the first ІІ-ІІІ vibration modes were obtained when testing a model of the frame of a 9-storey building. In order to assess the degree of accuracy of the proposed method of simulating seismic impact from an accelerogram of one earthquake, floor movements of a building model were determined theoretically and experimentally. The comparison of the results of theoretical and experimental studies showed that the discrepancy between them is on average 10-15%.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.