Open Access

Table 1

Summary of machine learning models developed to predict smoke contamination levels and quality traits in wine and berries.

Product Type/Algorithm Inputs Targets/Outputs Accuracy Publication
Grapevine leaves Classification Levenberg–Marquardt 100 Near-infrared absorbance values (1596–2396 nm) 5 Levels and treatments of smoke taint 98% [6]
Berries Classification Levenberg–Marquardt 100 Near-infrared absorbance values (1596–2396 nm) 5 Levels and treatments of smoke taint 97% [6]
Wine Classification Levenberg–Marquardt 9 Electronic nose outputs in wine 5 Levels and treatments of smoke taint in wine 97% [10]
Wine/Berries Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 9 Electronic nose outputs in wine 20 Glycoconjugates and 10 volatile phenols in berries 1 h after smoking R = 0.98 [10]
Wine/Berries Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 9 Electronic nose outputs in wine 20 Glycoconjugates and 10 volatile phenols in berries at harvest R = 0.99 [10]
Wine Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 9 Electronic nose outputs in wine 17 Glycoconjugates and 7 volatile phenols in wine R = 0.99 [10]
Wine/Berries Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 100 Near-infrared absorbance values (1596–2396 nm) in berries 18 Glycoconjugates and 10 volatile phenols in berries 1 day after smoking R = 0.98 [7]
Wine/Berries Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 100 Near-infrared absorbance values (1596–2396 nm) in berries 18 Glycoconjugates and 10 volatile phenols in berries at harvest R = 0.98 [7]
Wine/Berries Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 100 Near-infrared absorbance values (1596–2396 nm) in berries 17 Glycoconjugates and 6 volatile phenols in wine R = 0.98 [7]
Must and wine Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 100 Near-infrared absorbance values (1596–2396 nm) in must 17 Glycoconjugates and 6 volatile phenols in wine R = 0.99 [7]
Wine Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 100 Near-infrared absorbance values (1596–2396 nm) in wine 17 Glycoconjugates and 6 volatile phenols in wine R = 0.99 [7]
Wine Regression Bayesian Regularization 9 Electronic nose outputs Peak area of 8 volatile aromatic compounds R = 0.99 [5]
Wine Regression Levenberg–Marquardt 9 Electronic nose outputs in wine Liking of 11 sensory attributes, emotion scale, and perceived quality plus the intensity of smoke aroma. R = 0.98 [10]
Wine Regression Bayesian Regularization 9 Electronic nose outputs Smoke aroma intensity R = 0.97 [5]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.