Issue |
BIO Web of Conferences
Volume 1, 2011
The International Conference SKILLS 2011
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 00034 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20110100034 | |
Published online | 15 December 2011 |
What Observation of Motor Skills Does and Does Not Teach Us
School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Canada
E-mail: nicola.hodges@ubc.ca, nicole.ong@alumni.ubc.ca, blarssen@interchange.ubc.c, shannonblim@gmail.com
We review data from 4 experiments where we have been studying what is learnt through observation. In these experiments people learnt to reach in a distorted visual-motor, virtual environment. In all experiments observers successfully adapted to new visual-motor environments just by watching. Importantly, however, they adapted differently to actors. At no time did naïve observers show after-effects when returned to a known normal environment. However, if observers had previously practiced in this environment, after-effects were subsequently seen following an observation phase. Further, again different to actors, they showed good retention and lack of interference when performing in two opposing environments. We argue that observation does not result in the updating of an internal (motor) model, that it is primarily strategically mediated and that only after physical experience in the environment can ‘motor-simulation’ through observation take place.
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.