Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 160, 2025
IV International Conference on Improving Energy Efficiency, Environmental Safety and Sustainable Development in Agriculture (EESTE2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01020 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Sustainable Development in Agriculture | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202516001020 | |
Published online | 12 February 2025 |
Meat productivity of cross-bred rams in comparison with pure-bred animals of the original breeds on the maternal line
1 Don State Agrarian University, Persianovski set., Octyabrski district, Rostov region, 346493, Russia
2 Peasant Farm, Rostov Region, Russia
* Corresponding author: nauka.ross@yandex.ru
In this experiment, the meat productivity (morphological and varietal composition of carcasses, yield of anatomical cuts) of experimental rams of new genotypes was assessed: Texel x Soviet Merino and Texel x Ebilbaevskaya. Purebred animals of the Soviet Merino and Edilbaevskaya breeds were studied as control variants. As a result of the experiment, the pre-slaughter weight of crossbred animals was dominant relative to purebred animals, based on which the weight of the fresh carcass of crossbred animals naturally increased by 2.09 kg (P < 0.01) and 2.87 kg (P < 0.01), and the slaughter yield by 2.30% and 2.77% over purebred original breeds. It was found that the meat coefficient of F1 rams was higher due to the increase in the yield of pulp by 20.63% (P<0.01) and 16.63% (P<0.05) relative to purebreds. A stable change in fatty acids in the composition of lamb and subcutaneous fat towards optimizing the ratio of unsaturated to saturated was revealed. Hybridization, as a method of improving the meat productivity of sheep, using rams of meat breeds, has proven its effectiveness in our studies.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.