| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 204, 2025
International Conference on Advancing Science and Technologies in Health Science (IEM-HEALS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01020 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202520401020 | |
| Published online | 12 December 2025 | |
Evaluating Temperature Scaling Calibration Effectiveness for CNNs under Varying Noise Levels in Brain Tumour Detection
Department of CSE(AIML), Institute of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Accurate confidence estimation in deep learning is essential for high-stakes applications like medical imaging, where overconfident misclassifications can lead to serious consequences. This study looks at how Temperature Scaling (TS), a method used after training, can improve the reliability of CNNs in brain tumor classification. We create a custom CNN and train it on a dataset of brain MRIs. To simulate real-world uncertainty, we add five types of image noise to the test set: Gaussian, Poisson, Salt & Pepper, Speckle, and Uniform. We evaluate model performance using precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, negative log-likelihood (NLL), and expected calibration error (ECE) both before and after calibration. The results show that TS significantly lowers ECE and NLL under all noise conditions without losing classification accuracy. These findings support the use of TS as an effective and simple approach to improving the decision confidence of medical AI systems, making their outputs more trustworthy in noisy or uncertain environments.
Key words: Temperature Scaling / Confidence Calibration / Brain Tumor Detection / Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) / Medical Image Classification / Expected Calibration Error (ECE) / Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL)
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

