| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2026
International Colloquium on Youth, Environment, and Sustainability – “Earth System Equity: Integrating Social-Economy and Ecological Solutions within Planetary Boundaries” (ICYES 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01006 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| Section | Climate Change, Resilience, and Adaptation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202622501006 | |
| Published online | 06 March 2026 | |
A Life Cycle Framework Model for Quantifying the Carbon Footprint of Green Buildings Based on the Indonesian Building Code, Case Study: Engineering Tower, Sriwijaya University, Palembang
1 Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
2 Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
4 Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: Anis Saggaff (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
)
Abstract
This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA)-based framework to quantify the carbon footprint of green buildings in Indonesia, explicitly aligning the model with national building standards and policy contexts. The framework integrates Indonesian standards and national emission factor resources into a stage-wise LCA (embodied, operational, and end-of-life) suitable for building practitioners and researchers. Applied to the Engineering Tower at Sriwijaya University (Palembang), an 8-story, 10,141 m² reinforced concrete educational facility, the framework was validated across life cycle stages A1-A5, B1-B7, and C1-C4 using localized inventory data, including the South Sumatra grid emission factor (0.78 kgCO₂e/kWh) and material take-offs from project documentation.The 50- year whole-life carbon totals 15,302 tCO₂e, equivalent to 1,510 kgCO₂e/m² (30.2 kgCO₂e/m²·year). Operational energy (B6) dominates at 68%, followed by embodied materials (A1-A5) at 24%, and end-of-life (C1-C4) at 5%. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that a combined scenario of 20% grid decarbonization and 30% cement substitution (fly ash/slag) can reduce whole-li*fe carbon by approximately 20%.The IGBC-LCA framework translates Indonesia's Green Building provisions (PP 16/2021; Permen PUPR 21/2021) into a quantitative, policy-ready approach for benchmarking, early-stage optimization, and national decarbonization roadmap development. This study demonstrates how standardized, code- aware LCA improves comparability and decision-making while identifying the most influential life cycle stages for carbon reduction strategies.
Key words: Life cycle assessment / Carbon footprint / Green buildings / Indonesia / Embodied carbon / Operational carbon / Decarbonization scenarios / SNI standards
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

