| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 242, 2026
3rd International Research Meeting of Forest Culture Science in Asia (FOCUS-Asia 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01007 | |
| Number of page(s) | 17 | |
| Section | Forest Diversity | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202624201007 | |
| Published online | 07 July 2026 | |
Uncertainty analysis of satellite rainfall input data in a hydrological model using the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method
Forest Resources Conservation Dept., Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Uncertainty analysis estimates the range of variability in a model's expected results. A main source of uncertainty in hydrological models is rainfall input data. This study aims to evaluate the uncertainty in satellite-based rainfall data for the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model using the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method. The Upper Bogowonto Watershed, Central Java, is selected to test the method. The results of the study showed that bias correction significantly reduced the bias in satellite rainfall data. The reference model using field observation data demonstrated good performance, with R2 = 0.64 and KGE = 0.80 for the calibration period and R2 = 0.63 and KGE = 0.78 for the validation period. The GLUE analysis revealed that the range of input data uncertainty covered 60% of the observation data during the calibration period and 63% during the validation period. High uncertainty occurred during peak flow and tended to be lower during low flow. The GSMaP satellite data were considered the best rainfall input data for the hydrological model in the Upper Bogowonto Watershed.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

