Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 56, 2023
43rd World Congress of Vine and Wine
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 6
Section Oenology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20235602009
Published online 24 February 2023

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

1 Introduction

Red wines contain colloids, macromolecules, and aggregates of molecules, that are aggregated proteins, polysaccharides and polyphenolic compounds [1] verified the presence in some red wines of colloids made up of aggregates of polysaccharides, proteins and phenolic compounds and others in which proteins were absent.

When the colloidal dispersions are stable over time, the wines remain limpid, but if they become unstable aggregates are formed which can remain in suspension (cloudy wines) or precipitate (appearance of deposits). The precipitation of colloids is one of the causes of the loss of color.

The permanence at low temperature (cold stabilization) is the most used technique for the stabilization of wines as regards both the tartaric and colloidal precipitations, but this is an energy-consuming technique. In view of a sustainable management of cellar practices, this work concerned the evaluation of the possibility of using some enological products (adjuvants and additives) for the colloidal stabilization of wines not subjected to cold stabilization.

The test involved 2 wines, a Barbera from the 2019 harvest and a Montepulcianod’ Abruzzo from the 2020 harvest.

The clarification treatments with adjuvants were aimed at removing the unstable colloidal compounds, in particular polyphenols in aggregate form and/or proteins, while the addition of additives aimed at integrating the medium wine with protective colloids.

2 Materials and methods

The experiment was conducted with a Barbera wine from the 2019 harvest and a Montepulcianod' Abruzzo wine from the 2020 harvest, both unstable to colloidal precipitation. Before the test, the wines were stabilized against tartaric precipitation without the use of cold, respectively with the use of electrodialysis (Barbera) and exchange resins (Montepulcianod' Abruzzo).

The tests were carried out 3 months after the end of the alcoholic fermentation, with the wines that had completed the MLF. Barberahad an alcohol content of 12.77%, a pH of 3.62 and a titratable acidity of 4.95 g/L. Montepulcianod' Abruzzohad an alcohol content of 14.67%, a pH of 3.55 and a titratable acidity of 7.23 g/L.

Eight theses were prepared, treated respectively with calcium bentonite (Ben_Ca), sodium bentonite (Ben_Na), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), cold soluble gelatin/ nebulized gelatin (Gel_fr), hot soluble gelatin/ gelatin Gold (Gel_cal), isinglass (Ittcolla), chitosan and PVI/PVP(PVIPVP). The doses of use of the enological products are reported in Table 1.

Three days after the treatment the wines were decanted, filtered with a 3 μm filter and bottled. Another 4 theses, in duplicate, were treated respectively with Kordofan gum (GommaK), Mannoprotein1 (Mannopr1), Mannoprotein2 (Mannopr2) and with a natural polysaccharide polymer (PolNat).

The doses and methods of use of the additives are reported in Table 2. Forty eight hours after the additions, the wines were filtered with a 3 μm filter and bottled. Finally, a control thesis was prepared with the not treated wine, it was filtered at 3 μm and bottled. All tests were performed in duplicate as 10 L volumes. The bottles were stored in a thermostated room at a temperature of 20°C. The wines were analyzed 48 hours after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging.

The analyses concerned the content of total anthocyanins and flavonoids [2], and wine color. The turbidity of the control wine was also evaluated and the presence of deposits in the bottle was verified. The colloidal stability test [3] and a shock test were performed.

The colloidal stability test consists in measuring the initial turbidity (NTU0) of the wines, filtering them at 0.45 μm if the turbidity exceeds 2 NTU, and then storing them at 4°C for 48 h. The measurement is repeated at the end of the test (NTUt): if the variation in turbidity (ΔNTU = NTUt-NTU0) exceeds 2 NTU, the wine is considered unstable. The shock test consists in measuring the initial turbidity (NTU0) of the wines, filtering them at 0.45 μm if the turbidity exceeds 2 NTU, and then storing them at 40°C for 24 h and for 7 days. The measurement is repeated at the end of the test (NTUt): if the variation in turbidity (ΔNTU = NTUt-NTU0) exceeds 2 NTU, the wine is considered unstable.

Table 1

List of adjuvants, dose and method of use.

Table 2

List of additives, dose and method of use.

3 Results and Discussion

The effectiveness of some clarification treatments on the colloidal stabilization of red wines was compared. Some classic clarifiers were tested, used for the removal of the main constituents of the colloidal fraction, proteins and polyphenolic compounds (polymeric pigments and condensed tannins), such as bentonites (sodium and calcium), gelatins (hot soluble and cold soluble), isinglass and a mixture PVI/PVP.

Chitosan and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) were also used. In this test, CMC was included among the enological adjuvants, despite being an additive for the prevention of tartaric precipitations, in orderto verify whether its use caused the removal of the unstable colloidal fraction. [4] found that the addition of this product resulted in the formation of turbidity and the appearance of deposits in some red wines, and [5] verified that this instability was due to the interaction of CMC with the protein fraction of wines.

3.1 Barbera trial

3.1.1 Adjuvants

Table 3 shows the results of the colloidal instability test performed with the control theses and with the theses treated with clarifiers after bottling and after 6 months of storage.

All theses treated with clarifiers, with the exception of the CMC theses, showed a lower degree of instability than the control, however only the one treated with sodium bentonite (BenNa thesis) was perfectly stable. Followingin effectiveness, there were hot soluble gelatin and calcium bentonite. The CMC thesis had the highest degree of instability, however the appearance of turbidity was not immediate and the wines were clear after bottling; only later, during storage, they showed a progressive increase in turbidity (Table 1). On the contrary, the theses treated with the other clarifiers after 6 months of storage were clear, with turbidity values lower than the control.

The selectivity of action of the clarifiers on total anthocyanins and flavonoids and on color was verified. The results are reported in Table 4.

After the treatments with adjuvants, the reductions in the total anthocyanins content were limited overall, ranging from 0 (chitosan) to 8.5% (PVIPVP). The removals caused by bentonites were equal to 7.5%. No significant reduction of the total anthocyanin content was observed, neither in the chitosan thesis, nor in the CMC and cold soluble gelatin theses. No decreases in the total flavonoid content were observed in any treated thesis.

The treatments with clarifiers resulted in a modest, but significant reduction in color intensity for all theses and a modest, but significant increase in hue for some theses. The losses in color intensity ranged from 0.6 to 1.0 u.a. For all theses, except for those treated with isinglass and chitosan, the value of the E520corr parameter (which expresses the intensity of the red color corrected of the bleaching effect of SO2) was significantly lower than the control thesis.

After 6 months of storage, the total anthocyanin and flavonoid content and the color intensity dropped in all wines. No treated thesis was significantly different from the control for the total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and for the color intensity and hue. Only the theses treated with bentonites and with cold soluble gelatin (Gel_fr) had E520corr values significantly lower than the control; the differences, however, were modest and not visually appreciable.

Table 3

Barbera wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 4

Barbera wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

3.1.2 Additives

The effect on colloidal stability of some enological additives was studied. A Kordofan gum, 2 mannoproteins and a natural polysaccharide polymer were tested. The tests were performed in parallel with the clarification tests.

Table 5 shows the results of the colloidal stability tests performed after bottling and after 6 months of storage. The addition of a mannoprotein (Mannopr2) stabilized the wine, while the addition of Kordofan gum was effective immediately after bottling, but its stabilizing effect was reduced during storage.

All theses were then subjected to the shock tests (Table 5). After permanence at 40°C for 7 days, a strong increase in turbidity (ΔNTU> 10) was observed in the control thesis. Among the theses treated with additives, the one treated with the natural polysaccharide polymer (PolNat) remained stable after the shock test (ΔNTU< 2), and the Mannopr2 thesis, the only one stable after the colloidal stability test, showed an increase in turbidity slightly above the stability threshold (ΔNTU=3.1). The results of the shock test repeated after 6 months of bottle aging confirmed what observed after bottling: after storage at 40°C for 7 days, the Mannopr2 and PolNat theses showed the lowest increases in turbidity: 2.9 and 3.1 ΔNTU, respectively, values that were close to the stability threshold of 2 NTU.

As for the tests with clarifiers, the total anthocyanins and total flavonoids content and some color parameters were determined for the wines treated with additives (Table 6).

The theses treated with additives, except for the Mannopr1 thesis, showed total anthocyanins concentrations significantly higher than the control, even if the differences were quantitatively modest. The theses were very similar to each other in terms of total flavonoid content. Significant differences between theseswere found for the color intensity: the control thesis was distinguished from all the other theses treated with additives for the significantly more intense color. It is likely that the observed color differences depended on the SO2 content (presence of SO2 in preparations containing added additives). In fact, there was no difference between the theses for the color intensity when measured after the correction of the bleaching effect of SO2 (E520corr). After 6 months of bottle aging the theses were still significantly different from each other for the total anthocyanin content, albeit with modest differences: in particular, the Mannopr2 and GommaK theses presented a significantly higher total anthocyanin content than the control. As for the total flavonoid content, the differences between the theses were modest. Finally, no significant differences were found for the color parameters (color intensity and hue and E520corr).

Table 5

Barbera wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses with additives, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 6

Barbera wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses with additives, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

3.2 Montepulciano trial

The same test was repeated with a Montepulciano wine from the 2020 harvest.

3.2.1 Adjuvants

Table 7 shows the results of the stability tests and turbidity for the wines treated with adjuvants, performed after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging.

The initial wine (Control) was highly unstable with the colloidal stability test (48 h at 4 °C) (ΔNTU=274). The treatment with clarifiers resulted in an average (but not significant) reduction in the degree of instability, particularly in the theses treated with hot soluble gelatin (Gel_cal) and bentonites (BenNa and BenCa). However, all theses after the clarifying treatment were still highly unstable. Despite the results of the stability test, all wines were perfectly clear and stable after the shock test. After 6 months of storage, the wines remained clear, and the colloidal instability detected after bottling was confirmed, as well as the shock test stability.

As for the first test, the selectivity of action of the clarifiers on the total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and on the color was verified. The results are reported in Table 8. After the treatments with adjuvants, no significant reductions in the total anthocyanin content were observed in the clarified theses compared to the control. The highest average removals of total anthocyanins were observed after the treatment with sodium bentonite (BenNa) and were equal to about 2.3%. No decreases in total flavonoid content were observed in any clarified thesis compared to the control.

The presence of statistically significant differences between the theses was observed for the color intensity and the E520corr parameter. Only for this last parameter, the control thesis had significantly higher values than the theses treated with bentonites (BenCa and BenNa), PVI/PVP, hot soluble gelatin (Gel_cal) and CMC (reductions between 0.3 and 0.8u.a.). After 6 months of storage the total anthocyanin and flavonoid content dropped, and only the BenNa thesis showed a significantly lower total anthocyanin content than the control thesis. Some theses (Gel_fr, BenNa, Gel_cal, Ittcol and CMC) were distinguished from the control for the lower content of total flavonoids, and other theses (BenCa, PVIPVP, BenNa, CMC and Gel_Ca) for the lower color intensity and the lower values of the E520corrparameter. The differences were always modest.

Table 7

Montepulciano wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 8

Montepulciano wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

3.2.2 Additives

As observed for the adjuvants, the additives did not allow to obtain wines stable against colloidal precipitations (Table 9). The added products that determined a significant but insufficient reduction in the degree of instability were, in increasing order of effectiveness, Kordofan gum (GommaK), a mannoprotein (Mannopr2) and the natural polysaccharide polymer (PolNat). Despite the strong colloidal instability, the control thesis was clear after bottling, while the addition of additives caused a slight increase in turbidity in all theses (presence of significant differences compared to the control only for the Mannopr2 thesis). As observed for the theses treated with adjuvants and the control, all theses added with additives were perfectly clear and stable after the shock test. After 6 months, an increase in turbidity was observed in all theses, particularly in the PolNat thesis. The wines were all highly unstable with the colloidal instability test and stable with the shock test.

After bottling, no thesis was significantly different from the control for the content in total anthocyanins and flavonoids and for the color parameters (Table 10), while after 6 months in the bottle, compared to the test, the GommaK thesis had a content in total anthocyanins and flavonoids significantly higher, while the PolNat thesis a significantly lower value of E520corr.

Table 9

Montepulciano wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses with additives, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 10

Montepulciano wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses with additives after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

4 Conclusions

The Barbera wine (2019) which had a medium-low degree of colloidal instability was stable, without the use of cold, after a clarification treatment with sodium bentonite or after the addition of one of the 2 tested mannoproteins. The use of these 2 oenological products avoided the appearance of cloudiness even when the wine was stored for a short period under unfavorable thermal conditions (shock test at 40°C for 1 and 7 days), such as those that could accidentally occur during transport over long distances. The stabilizing effectiveness of mannoproteins depends on the type of product used: the best results were obtained with a mannoprotein with a molecular weight of 40-60 kDa.

On the contrary, no clarifying treatment and no additives among those tested during this experiment were instead able to stabilize the Montepulcianod’ Abruzzo wine (2020), which had a high degree of colloidal instability. At the moment, in case of high colloidal instability a preliminary low temperature treatment should be always advisable to achieve the colloidal stability.

Overall, the treatments with clarifiers did not markedly affect the polyphenolic component and the color of the wines, and the differences between the treated theses and the control tended to further decrease during storage.

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by Dal Cin Spa company. Thanks to Ciccio Zaccagnini winery which supplied the Montepulcianod' Abruzzo wine for the test.

References

All Tables

Table 1

List of adjuvants, dose and method of use.

Table 2

List of additives, dose and method of use.

Table 3

Barbera wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 4

Barbera wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 5

Barbera wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses with additives, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 6

Barbera wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses with additives, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 7

Montepulciano wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 8

Montepulciano wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses treated with adjuvants, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 9

Montepulciano wine. Average values of turbidity, colloidal stability and shock tests for the control wine and the theses with additives, after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Table 10

Montepulciano wine. Total anthocyanins and flavonoids content and color parameters for the control wine and the theses with additives after bottling and after 6 months of bottle aging. ANOVA and Tukey’s test results. Different letters along the column discriminate the theses significantly different from one another (p<0.05; Tukey’s test).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.