BIO Web Conf.
Volume 17, 2020International Scientific-Practical Conference “Agriculture and Food Security: Technology, Innovation, Markets, Human Resources” (FIES 2019)
|Number of page(s)||5|
|Published online||28 February 2020|
- A.A. Goncharenko, Actual issues of winter rye selection (Moscow, 2014) [Google Scholar]
- B.Y. Kim, A.C. Baier, D.J. Somers et al, Aluminum tolerance in triticale, wheat and rye, Euphytica, 120(3), 329–337 (2001) [Google Scholar]
- F.L. Xiao, F.M. Jian, M. Hideaki, Aluminum-induced secretion of both citrate and malate in rye, Plant and Soil, 242(2), 235–243 (2002) [Google Scholar]
- H. N. Phillips, B. J. Heins, K. Delate et al., Impact of grazing dairy steers on winter rye (Secale cereale) versus winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and effects on meat quality, fatty acid and amino acid profiles, and consumer acceptability of organic beef, PloS ONE, 12(11), 1–18 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- A.M. Kurnayev, K.M. Syrovatko, S.M. Kulik et al., Nutritional and productive performance of green material and silage of winter rye and typhon mix, Science bulletin of National University of biological resources and natural resources management of Ukraine, 205, 143–149 (2015) [Google Scholar]
- H. K. K., T. J. B., C. K. Y. et al., A comparison of oak browse (Quercus spp.) and silages of rye and maize with respect to voluntary intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and rumination time in penned korean sika deer, Animal Feed Sci. and Technol., 61 (1-4), 351–359 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Boros, R.R. Marquardt, W. Guenter et al., Chick adaptation to diets based on milling fractions of rye varying in arabinoxylans content, Animal Feed Sci. and Technol., 101 (1-4), 135–149 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M.R. Bedford, Mechanism of action and potential environmental benefits from the use of feed enzymes, Animal Feed Sci. and Technol., 53(2), 145–155 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D.N. Cooper, R.J. Martin, N.L. Keim, Does whole grain consumption alter gut microbiota and satiety? Healthcare, 3, 364–392 (2015) [Google Scholar]
- S. Kuo, B. Huang, R. Bembenek, Effect of winter cover crops on soil nitrogen availability, corn yield, and nitrate leaching, The sci. world, 1(S2), 22–29 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Lawson, C. Cogger, A. Bary et al., Influence of seeding ratio, planting date and termination date on rye-hairy vetch cover crop mixture performance under organic management, PLoS ONE, 10(6), (2015) [Google Scholar]
- R.W. Malone, J.F. Obrycki at al., Harvesting fertilized rye cover crop: simulated revenue, net energy and drainage nitrogen loss, Agricult. & Environmental Letters, (2018) [Google Scholar]
- J. Bondziewicz, J. Cebula, K. Piotrowski et al., Silage from the standard rye as substrate for the production of agricultural biogas, Science bulletin of National University of biological resources and natural resources management of Ukraine, 261, 2937 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- M. Serenius, E. Huusela-Veistola, H. Avikainen et al., Effects of sowing time on pink snow mould, leaf rust and winter damage in winter rye varieties in Finland, Agricult. and Food Sci., 14, 362–376 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Hakala, K. Pahkala, Comparison of central and northern European winter rye cultivars grown at high latitudes, The J. of Agricult. Sci., 141(2), 169–178 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G.I. Popov, V.T. Vasko, N.G. Pugach, Winter rye selection (Leningrad, 1986) [Google Scholar]
- Methods of state variety testing of agricultural crops (Kolos, Moscow, 1971) [Google Scholar]
- Guidelines for the study of winter rye collection (Leningrad, 1985) [Google Scholar]
- International CMEA classifier of the Secale L specie (Leningrad, 1984) [Google Scholar]
- B.A. Dospekhov, Field experiment methods (Kolos, Moscow, 1968) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.