Factors Affecting The Economic Impact of Livestock Assistance in Palopo City, Indonesia

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 69, 2023 The 2^nd International Conference on Agriculture, Food, and Environment (2^nd ICAFE 2023)


Article Number		04004
Number of page(s)		9
Section		Agricultural Environment, Ecology and Resources
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20236904004
Published online		16 October 2023

C. Ragasa, J. Ulimwengu, J. Randriamamonjy, and T. Badibanga, “Factors Affecting Performance of Agricultural Extension: Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo,” J. Agric. Educ. Ext., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 113–143, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2015.1026363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. D. Saputri, S. Anantanyu, and A. Wjianto, “Perkembangan Kelompok Tani Di Kabupaten Sukoharjo,” J. Agrista, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 341–352, 2016. [Google Scholar]
A. F. Sunartomo, “Agricultural Extension Capacity In Efforts To Increase Agricultural Productivity In East Java,” J. Sos. Ekon. Dan Kebijak. Pertan., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 126–136, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v5i2.1343. [Google Scholar]
N. A. Purwatiningsih, A. Fatchiya, and R. S. H. Mulyandari, “Pemanfaatan Internet dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian di Kabupaten Cianjur,” J. Penyul., vol. 14, no. 1, 2018 DOI: 10.25015/penyuluhan.v14i1.17173. [Google Scholar]
O. Anwarudin, S. Sumardjo, A. Satria, and A. Fatchiya, “Peranan Penyuluh Pertanian Dalam Mendukung Keberlanjutan Agribisnis Petani Muda Di Kabupaten Majalengka,” J. Agribisnis Terpadu, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 17, 2020, DOI: 10.33512/jat.v13i1.7984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
K. Berhanu and C. Poulton, “The Political Economy of Agricultural Extension Policy in Ethiopia: Economic Growth and Political Control,” Dev. Policy Rev., vol. 32, pp. s197–s213, 2014, DOI: 10.1111/dpr. 12082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. W. Mbatha and A. P. Consulting, “The sustainability of agricultural projects in enhancing rural economic development in Msinga local municipality,” no. November 2020. [Google Scholar]
R. Widiati, T. Prasetyo, Y. Suranindyah, S. Nurtini, Supriyadi, and I. Harsanto, “The performance of credit program for smallholder’s dairy cattle development in Indonesia,” 5th Int. Semin. Trop. Anim. Prod. Community Empower. Trop. Anim. Ind., pp. 753–758, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Sundari, A. H. A. Yusra, and Nurliza, “Peran Penyuluh Pertanian Terhadap Peningkatan Produksi Usahatani Di Kabupaten Pontianak,” J. Soc. Econ. Agric., vol. 4, pp. 26–31, 2015, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0813.2015.03.002. [Google Scholar]
O. M. Anwas, “Pengaruh Pendidikan Formal, Pelatihan, dan Intensitas Pertemuan terhadap Kompetensi Penyuluh Pertanian,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 50–62, 2013, DOI: 10.24832/jpnk.v19i1.107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. A. Managanta, “The Role of Agricultural Extension in Increasing Competence and Income Rice Farmers,” Indones. J. Agric. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–88, 2020, DOI: 10.32734/injar.v3i2.3963. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P. Terpadu, “Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat Berbasis Pertanian Terpadu di Joglo Tani,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 135–156, 2018, DOI: 10.14421/jpm.2018.021-07. [Google Scholar]
S. Azizah, “Training needs assessment of Agricultural Extension Officers in Animal Husbandry Department of Malang Regency, East Java-Indonesia,” J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 147–152, 2011. [Google Scholar]
L. R. Gay, G. E. Mills, and P. Airasian, EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Competencies for Analysis and Applications, 10th ed. USA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012. [Google Scholar]
S. Hermawan and W. Hariyanto, Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif), no. 0. 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
C. Chowa, C. Garforth, and S. Cardey, “Farmer Experience of Pluralistic Agricultural Extension, Malawi,” J. Agric. Educ. Ext., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 147–166, 2013, DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2012.735620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Serra-Cantallops, J. Ramon-Cardona, and F. Salvi, “The impact of positive emotional experiences on eWOM generation and loyalty,” Spanish J. Mark. - ESIC, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 142–162, 2018, DOI: 10.1108/SJME-03-2018-0009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
D. N. Saputra, N. Listyaningrum, Apriani, T. Rokhayati, Asnah, and Y. J. I. Leuhoe, Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian. 2022. [Google Scholar]
H. R. Solling and S. M. Anwar, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) berbasis varian Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi dengan Program SmartPLS 3.2.8 dalam Riset Bisnis, 1st ed. Jakarta: PT Inkubator Penulis Indonesia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Anak Agung Putu Agung and A. Yuesti, Metode Penelitian Bisnis Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Edisi Ke-1, vol. 1. 2013. [Google Scholar]
D. Darmawan and R. Mardikaningsih, “Pengaruh Keterampilan Interpersonal, Pengalaman Kerja, Integritas dan Keterikatan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian,” Ekon. Keuangan, Investasi dan Syariah, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 290–296, 2021, DOI: 10.47065/ekuitas.v3i2.1153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Y. F. Djoumessi, “What innovations impact agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa?,” J. Agric. Food Res., vol. 6, p. 100228, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100228. [Google Scholar]
M. A. Baloch and G. B. Thapa, “The effect of agricultural extension services: Date farmers’ case in Balochistan, Pakistan,” J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 282–289, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.05.007. [Google Scholar]
A. Mulyaningsih, Suherna, G. Gunawan, and Y. Haryanto, “Empowerment Strategy Of Rice Farmers In Banten Province,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 77–81, 2020. [Google Scholar]
R. A. Agunga, “What Ohio Extension Agents Say About Sustainable Agriculture,” J. Sustain. Agric., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 169–187, 2015, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J064v05n03_13. [Google Scholar]
H. Tasman and Y. Yusriadi, “Quality of agricultural extension on the productivity of farmers: Human capital perspective,” Uncertain Supply Chain Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 625–636, 2022, DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2021.11.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. Hasan, M. Turin, M. Ghosh, and M. Khalil, “Assessing Agricultural Extension Professionals Opinion towards Sustainable Agriculture in Bangladesh,” Asian J. Agric. Extension, Econ. Sociol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017, DOI: 10.9734/James/2017/33338. [Google Scholar]
R. Rustinsyah, “The significance of social relations in rural development: A case study of a beefcattle farmer group in Indonesia,” J. Co-op. Organ. Manag., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 100088, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcom.2019.100088. [Google Scholar]
R. Widiati and T. S. M. Widi, “Production Systems And Income Generation From The Smallholder Beef Cattle Farming In Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia,” Anim. Prod., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 51, 2016, DOI: 10.20884/1.anprod.2016.18.1.524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
J. A. R. Borges, A. G. J. M. Oude Lansink, C. Marques Ribeiro, and V. Lutke, “Understanding farmers’ intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior,” Livest. Sci., vol. 169, no. C, pp. 163–174, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Y. T. Bahta and V. A. Myeki, “The Impact of Agricultural Drought on Smallholder Livestock Farmers: Empirical Evidence Insights from Northern Cape, South Africa,” Agric., vol. 12, no. 4, 2022, DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12040442. [Google Scholar]
M. Thamrin, I. Apriyanti, and A. Gustiawan, “The Relation Of Agricultural Extension Program To The Dynamics OfPaddy Rice Farmers Groups.” [Google Scholar]
P. M. Christiansen, “The Usual Suspects: Interest Group Dynamics and Representation in Denmark,” Scale Interes. Organ. Democr. Polit., pp. 161–179, 2012, DOI: 10.1057/9780230359239_8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
W. Wellbrock and A. Knierim, “Unravelling group dynamics in institutional learning processes,” Outlook Agric., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 187–191, 2014, DOI: 10.5367/oa.2014.0173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.