Influence of feed supplement based on Andrographis paniculata and irradiated chitosan on in vitro fermentation and methane production of selected forage

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web of Conferences Volume 81, 2023 The 4^th International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Animal Industry (ICESAI 2023)


Article Number		00001
Number of page(s)		9
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20238100001
Published online		19 December 2023

I.A. Aboagye, K.A. Beauchemin, Animals 9 (2019). [Google Scholar]
A. Mahmud, A. Prima, Livest. Anim. Res. 19 (2021). [Google Scholar]
Statistics Indonesia. Beef Cattle Population ByProvince (Heads). (2023). [Google Scholar]
B. Króliczewska, E. Pecka-Kiełb, and J. Bujok, Agr. 13 (2023). [Google Scholar]
A. Jayanegara, F. Leiber, and M.J. Kreuzer, J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 96 (2012). [Google Scholar]
Y. Widiawati, W. Puastuti, The Effect of Condensed Tannin and Saponin in Reducing Methane Produced during Rumen Digestion of Agricultural Byproducts, in Proceedings of International Seminar on Livestock Production and Veterinary Tech. 139–146 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Jayanegara, K.A. Sarwono, M. Kondo, Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 17 (2018). [Google Scholar]
B.M. Roque, M. Venegas, R.D. Kinley, PLoS One 16 (2021). [Google Scholar]
R.P. Harahap, S. Suharti, M. Ridla, Anim. Sci. J 93 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
X. Sun, Q. Wang, Z. Yang, Fermentation 8 (2022). [Google Scholar]
R.P. Haryati, R.P. Harahap, A, Jayanegara, E.B. Laconi, Evaluation of chitin and chitosan from insect as feed additives to mitigate ruminal methane emission, in AIP Conf. Proc. 2120: 1–5 (2019). [Google Scholar]
A.I. Yusuf, M. Ebrahimi, Y.M. Goh, J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 11 (2012). [Google Scholar]
D. Priyoatmojo, Y. Maharani, D.J. Ansori, Anim. Healt. Prod. 9 (2021). [Google Scholar]
T. Wahyono, S. Widodo, A. Kurniawati, Y.N. Anggraeny, Y. Widiawati, M.N. Rofiq, A. Herliatika, D. Priyoatmojo, A.R. Syahputra, W.T. Sasongko, Green medicated supplement (Green MS) can reduce enteric methane emission from forage-based ruminant rations: In vitro study, in IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Env. Sci. 1133: 0–8 (2023). [Google Scholar]
AOAC, Official Method of Analysis 2005. [Google Scholar]
Ankom, Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds. Filter Bag Technique NDF Method 6 (2019) [Google Scholar]
Ankom, Acid Detergent Fiber in Feeds Filter Bag Technique Method (2019) [Google Scholar]
K.H. Menke, Steingass, H. Anim. Res. Dev. 28 (1988) [Google Scholar]
E.R. Ørskov, I.J. Mcdonald, Agr. Sci. Cambrid. 92 (1979) [Google Scholar]
J.W. Czerkawski. An Introduction to Rumen Studies. (1986) [Google Scholar]
A. El-Waziry, F. Alkoaik, A. Khalil, Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 4 (2016). [Google Scholar]
Y. Widiawati, A. Thalib, Ind. J. Agr. 2 (2009) [Google Scholar]
R.G.D. Steel, J.H. Torrie. Principles and procedures of statistics. (1960). [Google Scholar]
N.R. Kumalasari, A.T. Permana, R. Silvia, Interaction of Fertilizer, Light Intensity and Media on Maize Growth in Semi-Hydroponic System for Feed Production, in The7^th International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production, Yogyakarta (2017). [Google Scholar]
T. Wahyono, W.T. Sasongko, Y. Maharani, Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 9 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
T. Wahyono, I. Sugoro, A. Jayanegara, Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 7 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M.A. Lee, A.P. Davis, M.G.G. Chagunda, Bio. 14 (2017). [Google Scholar]
A.S. Anggraeni, A. Jayanegara, E.B. Laconi, Czech J. Anim. Sci. 67 (2022). [Google Scholar]
A.M. Shah, I.H. Qazi, M. Matra, Ferment. 8 (2022). [Google Scholar]
Y. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Yang, Energies. 15 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.