Impact of heat stress on sucrose metabolism of watermelon

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 85, 2024 3^rd International Conference on Research of Agricultural and Food Technologies (I-CRAFT-2023)


Article Number		01039
Number of page(s)		6
Section		Research of Agricultural and Food Technologies
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248501039
Published online		09 January 2024

M. Hasanuzzaman, K. Nahar, M.M. Alam, R. Roychowdhury, M. Fujita, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 14, 5, 9643-9684 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. Arora, D.S. Pitchay, B.C. Bearce, HortScience, 31, 4, 601a-601 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Rai R.G. Kumar, R.S. Dubey, Heat stress and its efects on plant growth and metabolism, in Abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms in plants, CRC Press, pp 203–235 (2018). [Google Scholar]
J.U. Din, S.U. Khan, A. Khan, A. Qayyum, K.S. Abbasi, M.A. Jenks, Hortic Environ Biotechnol., 56, 6, 769-776 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M.S. Jahan, Y. Wang, S. Shu, M. Zhong, Z. Chen, J. Wu, J. Sun, S. Guo, Sci Hortic., 247, 421-429 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
E. Turhan, C. Aydogan, S. Ergin, CTNS, 11, 21, 487-500 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M.A. Inupakutika, S. Sengupta, A.R. Devireddy, R.K. Azad, R. Mittler, J. Exp.Botany, erw, 382. [Google Scholar]
C.H. Foyer, G. Noctor, Antiox.Redox Sign., 18, 16, 2087-2090 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
R. Sharma, R. Bhardwaj, A.K. Thukral, N. Handa, R. Kaur, V. Kumar, Osmolyte dynamics: new strategies for crop tolerance to abiotic stress signals in Emerging Technologies and Management of Crop Stress Tolerance. Academic Press, pp. 405–430 (2014) [Google Scholar]
J.C. Rodrigues Neto, F.F. Salgado, I´dO Braga, T.L. Carvalho da Silva, V.N. Belo Silva, A.P. Leão, JAdA Ribeiro, P.V. Abdelnur, L.F. Valadares, C. A. F. de Sousa, M.T. Souza Junior, Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1187803 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
W. Saibi, H. Bouazzi, F. Brini, Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res., 10, 4, 310–315 (2020) [Google Scholar]
F. Omari Alzahrani, Planta, 253, 1, 24 (2021) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F. Ahmad, A. Singh, A. Kamal, Osmoprotective role of sugar in mitigating abiotic stress in plants in: Protective chemical agents in the amelioration of plant abiotic stress: biochemical and molecular perspectives (eds: Aryadeep Roychoudhury and Durgesh Kumar Tripathi), pp. 53-70 (2020) [Google Scholar]
G.M. Martínez Noel, J.A. Tognetti, Sugar signaling under abiotic stress in plants in Plant Metabolites and Regulation Under Environmental Stress, Academic Press, pp. 397–406 (2018) [Google Scholar]
A. Aslam, S. Zhao, M. Azam, X. Lu, N. He, B. Li, J. Duo, H. Zhu W. Liu, PeerJ, 8, e8259.M (2020) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
R.M. Anur, N. Mufithah, W.D. Sawitri, H. Sakakibara, B. Sugiharto, Plants, 9, 2, 200 (2020) [Google Scholar]
Z. Tymowska-Lalanne, M. Kreis Advan. Bot. Research, 28, C, 71–117 (1998) [Google Scholar]
D.P. Xu, S-J.S. Sung, T. Loboda, P.P. Kormanik, C.C Black, Plant Physiol., 90, 2, 635–642 (1989) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
R. Arora, D.S. Pitchay, B.C. Bearce, Phsiol. Plantarum, 103, 24-34 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. Arora, M.E. Wisniewski, R. Scorza, Plant Physiology, 99, 1562–1568 (1992) [Google Scholar]
T.T. Ngo, H.M. Lenhoff, Anal Biochem., 105, 389–397 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
E. Van Handel, Anal. Biochem. 22, 280-283 (1968) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
G.L. Miller, Anal. Chem., 31, 426-428 (1959) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Dinar, J. Rudich, E. Zamski, Ann. Bot., 51, 97-103 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
B. Aloni, T. Pashikar, L. Karni Ann. Bot., 67, 371-377 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
B. Aloni, L. Karni, Z. Zaidman, A. Schaffer, Ann. Bot. 78, 163-168 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M.M. Bradford, Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 (1976) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Kesici, H. Gulen, S. Ergin, E. Turhan, A. Ipek, N. Koksal, Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo., 41, 238–243 (2013) [Google Scholar]
E. Turhan, C. Aydogan, S. Ergin, N. Ozturk, J.Biotech., 208, 31 (2015) [Google Scholar]
A. Tokyol, E. Turhan, Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, 62, 1, 472-479 (2019) [Google Scholar]
I. Cohen, S.I. Zandalinas, C. Huck, F.B. Fritschi, R. Mittler, Physiol. Plantarum, 171, 1, 66-76 (2021) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
R. Awasthi, K. Bhandari, H. Nayyar, Front Environ Sci., 3, 1–24 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
H.A. Ceylan, I. Türkan, A.H. Sekmen, Plant Growth Regul., 32, 72–82 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. Ergin, M. Kesici, H. Gülen, J. Agri. F. Harran Uni, 16, 1, 25–35 (2012) [Google Scholar]
M.A. Hossain, S. Bhattacharjee, S-M. Armin, P. Qian, W. Xin, H-Y Li, D.J. Burritt, M. Fujita, L-S.P. Tran, Front. in Plant Sci, 6, 2015 (2015) [Google Scholar]
Z. Xu, X. Chen, X. Lu, B. Zhao, Y. Yang, J. Liu, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 160, 315–328 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
E. Keunen, D. Peshev, J. Vangronsveld, D.E.W. Van, A. Cuypers, Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1242–1255 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
A.M. Lafta, J.H. Lorenzen, Plant Physiol., 109, 637-643 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Y. Luo, W.M. Li, Wang, W., Environ. Exp. Bot., 63, 378 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Y. W. Huang, Z.Q. Zhou, H.X. Yang, C.X. Wei, Y.Y Wan, X. J. Wang, J. G. Bai, Biol. Plantarum, 59, 1, 131 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
D. A. Loka, D.M. Oosterhuisa, D. Baxevanos, C. Noulas, W. Hu., Plant Physiol. Biochem., 148, 166-167 (2020) [Google Scholar]
X. Liu, B. Huang, Crop Sci, 40, 503 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
H. Li, M. Tiwari, Y. Tang, L. Wang, S. Yang, H. Long, J. Guo, Y. Wang, H. Wang, Q. Yang, S.V. Krishna Jagadish, R. Shao, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 246, 114191 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
H. Yang, X. Gu, M. Ding, W. Lu, D. Lu, Sci. Report, 8(15665) 1-9 (2018) [Google Scholar]
Y.L. Ruan, Molecular Plant, 5, 4, 763-765 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.