Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 85, 2024
3rd International Conference on Research of Agricultural and Food Technologies (I-CRAFT-2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01051 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Research of Agricultural and Food Technologies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248501051 | |
| Published online | 09 January 2024 | |
- Dobrovolskaya, T.G.; Zvyagintsev, D.G.; Chernov, I.Y.; Golovchenko, A.V.; Zenova, G.M.; Lysak, L.V.; Manucharova, N.A.;Marfenina, O.E.; Polyanskaya, L.M.; Stepanov, A.L.; et al. The role of microorganisms in ecological functions of soils. Soil Sci. 2015, 9, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar]
- Adhikari, K.; Hartemink, A. Linking soils to ecosystem services—A global review. Geoderma 2016, 262, 101–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Saccá, M.L.; Caracciolo, A.B.; Lenola, M.; Grenni, P. Ecosystem Services Provided By Soil Microorganisms. In Soil BiologicalCommunities and Ecosystem Resilience; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 9–24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Miao, S.; Tang Yu Xue, H.; Qiao, Y. Soil bacterial community responses to land-use change in Mollisol of Northeast China. Ecol.Eng. 2022, 184, 50–62. [Google Scholar]
- Gherghina, C.-A.; Matei, S.; Matei, G.; Daniela, R. Influence of land use on microbiological activity of sandy soils. In Proceedingsof the ICAMS 2014—5th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems, Bucharest, Romania, 23–25 October 2014;pp. 427–432 [Google Scholar]
- Ananyeva, N.D.; Ivashchenko, K.V.; Sushko, S.V. Microbial indicators of urban soils and their role in the assessment of ecosystemservices (review). Soil Sci. 2021, 54, 1517–1531 [Google Scholar]
- Curiel Yuste J., Janssens I.A., Carrara A., Meiresonne L. and Ceulemans R. 2003. Interactive effectof temperature and precipitation on soil respiration in a temperate maritime pine forest. TreePhysiol. 23: 1263–1270. [Google Scholar]
- Borken W., Xu Y.-J., Brumme R. and Lamersdorf N. 1999. A climate change scenario for carbondioxide and dissolved organic carbon fluxes from a temperate forest soil: drought and rewettingeffects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63: 1848–1855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Katić P., Đukanović D., Đaković P. (1979): Klima SAP Vojvodine. Poljoprivredni fakultet u Novom Sadu, Institut za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, Novi Sad. [Google Scholar]
- Zibilske, L.M. Carbon Mineralization. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Microbiological and Biochemical Properties; SSSA Book Series5.2; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994; Chapter 38. [Google Scholar]
- Alef, K.; Nannipieri, P. Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995; 608p [Google Scholar]
- Vershinin, A.A.; Petrov, A.M.; Karimullin, L.K.; Ignatiev Yu, A. Influence of oil pollution on the ecological and biological state ofvarious types of soils. Bull. Kazan Technol. Univ. 2012, 207–211 [Google Scholar]
- Kurganova I.N., Lopes de Gerenyu V.O., Khoroshaev D.A., Myakshina T.N., Sapronov D.V., Zhmurin V.A., and Kudeyarov V.N. (2020). Analysis of the long-term dynamics of soil respiration in forest and meadow cenoses of the Prioksko-Terrasny biosphere reserve in the perspective of current climatic trends. Eurasian Soil Science, 53(10), 1220-1236, DOI: 10.1134/S1064229320100117 [Google Scholar]
- Merzhanian A.S., Viticulture, 2nd ed., 1951; [Google Scholar]
- Negrul A.M., Viticulture with the basics of ampelography and selection, 3rd ed., M., 1959 [Google Scholar]
- K. Stoev. Physiology of grapes and the basics of its cultivation. Volume 2 Growth and Development of the Grapevine [Google Scholar]
- Probst, B.; Schüler, C.; Joergensen, R.G. Vineyard Soils under Organic and Conventional Management-Microbial Biomass andActivity Indices and Their Relation to Soil Chemical Properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2008, 44, 443–450 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.