Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 97, 2024
Fifth International Scientific Conference of Alkafeel University (ISCKU 2024)
Article Number 00079
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249700079
Published online 05 April 2024
  • P. Fajfar, D. Marušić, and I. Peruš, “The extension of the N2 method to asymmetric buildings,” Aug. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Peres, R. Bento, and J. M. Castro, “Nonlinear Static Seismic Performance Assessment of PlanIrregular Steel Structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 24, no. 2, pp. 226–253, Feb. 2020, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1469438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Lu, Y. Zhou, and W. Lu, “Shaking table model test and numerical analysis of a complex high-rise building,” The Structural Design ofTall and Special Buildings, 16, no. 2, pp. 131–164, Jun. 2007, DOI: 10.1002/tal.302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Richard, S. Koboevic, and R. Tremblay, “SEISMIC DESIGN AND RESPONSE OF HEAVY INDUSTRIAL STEEL BUILDINGS,” in 3rd ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Gerami, Y. Sharbati, and A. Sivandi-Pour, “Nonlinear seismic vulnerability evaluation of irregular steel buildings with cumulative damage indices,” International Journal ofAdvanced Structural Engineering, 5, no. 1, p. 9, Dec. 2013, DOI: 10.1186/2008-6695-5-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Homaioon Ebrahimi, P. Martinez-Vazquez, and C. C. Baniotopoulos, “Numerical studies on the effect of plan irregularities in the progressive collapse of steel structures,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13, no. 12, pp. 1576–1583, Dec. 2017, DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2017.1303842. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. E. Abdel Raheem, M. M. M. Ahmed, M. M. Ahmed, and A. G. A. Abdel-shafy, “Evaluation of plan configuration irregularity effects on seismic response demands of L-shaped MRF buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16, no. 9, pp. 3845–3869, Sep. 2018, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0319-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Jia, Y. Song, X. Chen, S. Liu, and B. Zhang, “Seismic Performance Evaluation of a High-Rise Building with Structural Irregularities,” Buildings, 12, no. 9, p. 1484, Sep. 2022, DOI: 10.3390/buildings12091484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Mohammadzadeh and J. Kang, “Seismic analysis of high-rise steel frame building considering irregularities in plan and elevation,” Steel and Composite Structures, 39, no. 1, pp. 65–80, Apr. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • American Institute of Steel Construction, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, vol. 15. AISC, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • The Regents of the University of California, “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation.” [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Bai, Y. Li, Z. Tang, M. Bittner, M. Broggi, and M. Beer, “Seismic collapse fragility of low-rise steel moment frames with mass irregularity based on shaking table test,” Bulletin ofEarthquake Engineering, 19, no. 6, pp. 2457–2482, Apr. 2021, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01076-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. M. Newmark, “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics,” ASCE Journal ofEngineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 85, 1959. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.