New food production technologies’ perception: Psychological barriers to consuming nonstandard protein sources

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 130, 2024 International Scientific Conference on Biotechnology and Food Technology (BFT-2024)


Article Number		05005
Number of page(s)		7
Section		Food Processing and Manufacturing
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413005005
Published online		09 October 2024

E. G. Myagkova, Y. P. Tarasenkova, Biotechnology for agriculture. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference dedicated to the year of ecology in Russia: Scientific and practical ways to increase environmental sustainability and socio-economic support of agricultural production, 732–734. (2017). [Google Scholar]
A. A. Napalkova, M. K. Koval, Practical Marketing 1(263), 15–26 (2019) [Google Scholar]
M. A. Martynenko, O. D. Glod, Vector of Economics 12, 38–38 (2017) [Google Scholar]
K. K. Behera, A. Alam, S. Vats, H. P. Sharma, V. Sharma, Organic farming history and techniques. Agroecology and strategies for climate change 287–328 (2012) [Google Scholar]
K. I. Cherkesova, V. I. Cherkesov, E. I. Cherkesova, Formation of the global market for eco-products. Improving the quality and safety of food products: Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, 264–266 (2018) [Google Scholar]
P. K. Sofia, R. Prasad, V. K. Vijay, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 5(1), 139–142 (2006) [Google Scholar]
Z. Jouzi, H. Azadi, F. Taheri, K., Zarafshani, K. Gebrehiwot, S. Van Passel, P. Lebailly, Ecological economics, 132, 144–154 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
J. D. Floros, R. Newsome, W. Fisher, G. V. Barbosa-Cá novas, H. Chen, C. P. Dunne, G. R. Ziegler, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 9(5), 572–599 (2010) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
L. P. Zhiganova, Prospects for the development of biotechnology in the 21st century. Russia and America in the XXI century 1, 10 (2008) [Google Scholar]
B. I. Ivanov, P. A. Dubnitskaya, Food and agricultural biotechnology. The state and prospects for the development of the agro-industrial complex: a collection of scientific papers of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference within the framework of the XXVI Agro-Industrial Forum of the South of Russia and the exhibition “Interagromash” and “Agrotechnologies”, 147–148 (2023) [Google Scholar]
E. A. Prutenskaya, A. A. Balakhsen, V. A. Bazuleva, Current Biotechnology 4, 44–45 (2023). [Google Scholar]
E. Yu. Nebrodovskaya-Mazur, I. P. Matveeva, Motives for consumption of environmental products. Russia and the World: Development of Civilizations. Transformations of civilizational values in the modern world, 574–579 (2021) [Google Scholar]
O. A. Kozlova, Assessing consumer perceptions of price premiums for organic products. Practical Marketing 8, 4–11 (2010). [Google Scholar]
R. K. Hutchins, L. A. Greenhalgh, Nutrition & Food Science 95(6), 11–14 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Davies, A. J. Titterington, C. Cochrane, British Food Journal 97 (10), 17–23 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
N. Ozguven, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2012.09 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yu. B. Kostrova, Moscow Economic Journal 8, 263–274 (2020) [Google Scholar]
R. Silverstone, Nutrition and Food Science 5, 10–14 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. A. Asgar, A. Fazilah, N. Huda, R. Bhat, A. A. Karim, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety 9(5), 513−529. (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
P. Kumar, M. K. Chatli, N. Mehta, P. Singh, O. P. Malav, A. K. Verma, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 57(5), 923−932 (2017) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
A. A. Makarova, State and prospects for the development of production of analogues of semi-finished meat products. Innovative technologies in the food industry and public catering 96−101 (2021) [Google Scholar]
A. N. Timofeeva, Soy protein in the meat industry and its effect on the body. Intellectual and scientific potential of the 21st century, 52−53 (2016) [Google Scholar]
A. Van Huis, Annual review of entomology 58(1), 563−583 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
A. L. Jorjão, L. D. Oliveira, L. Scorzoni, L. M. A. Figueiredo-Godoi, C. A. M. Prata, A. O. C. Jorge, J. C. Junqueira, Virulence 9(1), 383−389 (2018) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
J. Hwang, J. You, J. Moon, J. Jeong, Sustainability 12(14), 5662 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P. Lammers, L. M. Ullmann, F. Fiebelkorn, Food quality and preference 77, 78−88. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. A. Siddiqui, S. Khan, M. Q. U. Farooqi, P. Singh, I. Fernando, A. Nagdalian, Appetite 179, 106314 (2022) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
C. Hartmann, M. Siegrist, Consumer perception and behavior regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 61, 11−25 (2017) [Google Scholar]
W. Verbeke, A. Marcu, P. Rutsaert, R. Gaspar, B. Seibt, D. Fletcher, J. Barnett, Meat science 102, 49−58 (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
M. Wilks, C. J. Phillips, K. Fielding, M. J. Hornsey, Appetite 136, 137−145 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
J. Sabate, A. Duk, C. L. Lee, The American journal of clinical nutrition 70(3), 601−607 (1999) [Google Scholar]
K. M. Wendin, M. E. Nyberg, Current opinion in food science 40, 67−71 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P. N. Videbæk, K. G. Grunert, Food Quality and Preference 83, 103913 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
G. Sogari, Progress in Nutrition 17(4), 311−316 (2015) [Google Scholar]
S. Mancini, R. Moruzzo, F. Riccioli, G. Paci, Food Research International 122, 661−678 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
I. V. Abakumova, M. V. Godunov, E. V. Belova, N. E. Komerova, Russian Psychological Journal 19(1), 101–111. (2022). https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.1.8 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.