Open Access
Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 130, 2024
International Scientific Conference on Biotechnology and Food Technology (BFT-2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 08025 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
Section | Food and Agriculture Organization | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413008025 | |
Published online | 09 October 2024 |
- S. Bröring, N. Laibach, M. Wustmans, Innovation types in the bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 266, 121939 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121939 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Long, Export competitiveness of agricultural products and agricultural sustainability in China. Regional Sustainability 2(3), 203-210 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2021.09.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fu S., Liu H., Tan K.H., et al., How social capital affects the quality performance of agricultural products: Evidence from a binary perspective of China 10(9), 3009 (2018) DOI:10.3390/su10093009 [Google Scholar]
- Erokhin V., Diao L., Du P. Sustainability-related implications of competitive advantages in agricultural value chains: Evidence from central. Asia-China trade and investment 12(3), 1117 (2020) DOI:10.3390/su12031117 [Google Scholar]
- W. Nie, T. Li, L. Zhu, Market demand and government regulation for quality grading system of agricultural products in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 56(1), 102134 (2020) DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102134 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Klychova, A. Zakirova, I. Safiullin, et al., Rational placement of grain production – the basis for ensuring food security. E3S Web of Conferences 175, 08013 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017508013 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E. Mugoni, B. Nyagadza, P. K. Hove, Green reverse logistics technology impact on agricultural entrepreneurial marketing firms’ operational efficiency and sustainable competitive advantage. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship (2)2, 100034 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100034 [Google Scholar]
- A. Zakirova, G. Klychova, A. Bukharbayeva, et al., Using Digital Technology to Reduce the Carbon Footprint in Livestock Production. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 574, 2740-2749 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_303 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Neethirajan, B. Kemp, Digital Livestock Farming Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 32, 100408 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2021.100408 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Norton, C. Chen M.L.V. Larsen, D. Berckmans, Review: Precision livestock farming: Building ‘digital representations’ to bring the animals closer to the farmer Animal 13(12) 3009-3017 (2019) DOI:10.1017/S175173111900199X [Google Scholar]
- Ch. J. Bryant, Plant-based animal product alternatives are healthier and more environmentally sustainable than animal products. Future Foods 6, 100174 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100174 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Fusco, F. Campobasso, L. Laureti, et al., The environmental impact of agriculture: An instrument to support public policy. Ecological Indicators 147, 109961 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109961 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Chaudhary, V. Kumar, Emerging Technological Frameworks for the Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental Management. Sustainable Horizons 3, (2022) 100026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zh. Guo, X. Chen, Y. Zhang, Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers’ agricultural green production technology adoption: A new perspective of social capital. Technology in Society 71, 102085 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102085 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Lovarelli, J. Bacenetti, M. Guarino, A review on dairy cattle farming: Is precision livestock farming the compromise for an environmental, economic and social sustainable production? Journal of Cleaner Production 262, 121409 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121409 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Thumba, S. Lazarova-Molnar, P. Niloofar, Comparative evaluation of data requirements and level of decision support provided by decision support tools for reducing livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production 373, (2022) 133886 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133886 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sh. Mishra, S. K. Sharma, Advanced contribution of IoT in agricultural production for the development of smart livestock environments. Internet of Things 22, 100724 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100724 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Taifouris, M. Martín, Integrating intensive livestock and cropping systems: Sustainable design and location. Agricultural Systems 203, 103517 (2022) DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103517 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Klychova, A. Bukharbayeva, A. Zakirova, et al., The Main Directions of Increasing Exports of Agri-food Products in the Context of Integration into the World Market. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 575, 2607-2621 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21219-2_293 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Mukesh, G. Gujar, M. Sodhi, Chapter 26 - Livestock sector: an integral component for country’s food and social security. In book: Advances in Animal Experimentation and Modeling. Understanding Life Phenomena 341-351 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90583-1.00033 [Google Scholar]
- U. Sekaran, L. Lai, D. A.N. Ussiri, et al., Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 5, 100190 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100190 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. D. Boursianis, M. S. Papadopoulou, P. Diamantoulakis, et al., Internet of Things (IoT) and Agricultural Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in smart farming: A comprehensive review. Internet of Things 18, 100187 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100187 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Du, K. Jiang, Promoting enterprise productivity: The role of digital transformation. Borsa Istanbul Review 22(6) (2022), 1165-1181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.08.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.R. Eastwood, J.P. Edwards, J.A. Turner, Review: Anticipating alternative trajectories for responsible Agriculture 4.0 innovation in livestock systems. Animal 15, 100296 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100296 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- G. Klychova, A. Zakirova, K. Pinina, et al., Assessment of the efficiency of investing activities of organizations. E3S Web of Conferences 110, 02075 (2019) DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/201911002075. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- K. Jiang, Zh. Chen, A. Rughoo, M. Zhou, Internet finance and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 77, (2022) 101535 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101535 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Klychova, A. Zakirova, A. Nigmetzyanov, et al., Efficiency of corporate finance: Formation of accounting and management tools. E3S Web of Conferences 273, 10038 (2021) DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202127310038 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- G. Klychova, A. Zakirova, G. Ostaev, et al., Corporate finance in the system of economic analysis management and intensification. E3S Web of Conferences 273, 10037 (2021) DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202127310037 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- V. Canwat, S. Onakuse, Organic agriculture: A fountain of alternative innovations for social, economic, and environmental challenges of conventional agriculture in a developing country context. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy 3, 100025 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2022.100025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Klychova, G. Klychova, A. Zakirova, et al., Social development mechanism of an agricultural enterprise formation. E3S Web of Conferences 110, 02072 (2019) DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/201911002072. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- A. Semin, O. Betin, L. Namyatova, et al., Sustainable Condition of the Agricultural Sector’s Environmental, Economic, and Social Components from the Perspective of Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7(1), 74 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010074 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.