Open Access
Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 133, 2024
The 5th International Conference on Public Health for Tropical and Coastal Development (ICOPH-TCD 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 00026 | |
Number of page(s) | 19 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413300026 | |
Published online | 06 November 2024 |
- D. C, Reed, R. J. Schmitt, A. B. Burd, et al. Responses of coastal ecosystems to climate change: insights from long-term ecological research. Bioscience 72, 871–888 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. He & B. R. Silliman. Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 29, R1021–R1035 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.042 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. F. Moura, E. M. Roges, R. L. de. Souza, Siciliano, S. & Rodrigues, D. dos P. We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of open access books. Intech 11, 13 (2016). https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometric-technologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics [Google Scholar]
- J. I. Allen. Marine environment and human health: an overview. In Marine Pollution and Human Health (Eds. Hester, R.E., Harrison, R.M.) The Royal Society of Chemistry, 0 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849732871-00001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Santoro, S. Selvaggia, S. Gail, F. Géraldine, & T. Peter. Ocean Literacy for All: A Toolkit, 80th edn. UNESCO Publishing (2017). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260721 [Google Scholar]
- NOAA. Ocean Literacy: The Essential Principles and Fundamental Concepts of Ocean Sciences for Learners of All Ages, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2020). https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/39086 [Google Scholar]
- G. Fauville, C. Strang, M. A. Cannady & Y. F. Chen. Development of the International Ocean Literacy Survey: measuring knowledge across the world. Environ. Educ. Res. 25, 238–263 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1440381 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO-IOC. Ocean Literacy within the United Nations Ocean Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. AquadocsOrg (2022). https://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en [Google Scholar]
- B. Neumann, A. T. Vafeidis, J. Zimmermann & R. J. Nicholls. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding a global assessment. PLoS ONE 10, e0118571 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- N. Watts, M. Amann, N. Arnell, et al. The 2020 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change. Lancet Public Health 6, e64–e81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30256-5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J. Husna, I. Wijayanti, L. Budiastusi Wiratmo, et al. Mapping the scientific literature on mangrove conservation in Indonesia: a bibliometric analysis to environmental research. E3S Web Conf. 448, 1–16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344803036 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- E. Barbier. Marine ecosystem services. Curr. Biol. 27, R365–R367 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.020 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Mogias, T. Boubonari, G. Realdon, et al. Evaluating ocean literacy of elementary school students: preliminary results of a cross-cultural study in the Mediterranean Region. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 396 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00396 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Brennan, M. Ashley & O. Molloy. A system dynamics approach to increasing ocean literacy. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 360 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00360 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. V. Satterthwaite, V. Komyakova, N. G. Erazo, et al. Five actionable pillars to engage the next generation of leaders in the co-design of transformative ocean solutions. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001832 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001832 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- N. J. Bennett, T. S. Whitty, E. Finkbeiner, et al. Environmental stewardship: a conceptual review and analytical framework. Environ. Manage. 61, 597–614 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- L. E. Fleming, L. Rabbottini, M. H. Depledge, et al. Overview of oceans and human health, 2nd edn. Elsevier Inc. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-952279.00017-8 [Google Scholar]
- J. Husna, A. Syakur, I. Wijayanti, & L. B. Wiratmo. Vocational Educations and Training (VET) adoption at Science Techno Park (STP) in the field of maritime to promote business incubation and community empowerment in Indonesia. Int. J. Progress Sci. Technol. 38, 1–15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v38.2.5281 [Google Scholar]
- C. Pazoto, M. Duarte & E. Silva. Education and the marine environmental issue: a historical review of research fields and the popularization of conservation and management of the sea and ocean in Brazil. J. Environ. Educ. 54, 99–113 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2161979 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Bradbury-Jones, H. Aveyard, O. Herber, et al. Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 25, 1–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1899596 [Google Scholar]
- A. Wijaya, N. A. Setiawan, A. H. Ahmad, R. Zakaria & Z. Othman. Electroencephalography and mild cognitive impairment research: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis (ScoRBA). AIMS Neurosci. 10, 154–171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3934/NEUROSCIENCE.2023012 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- H. Arksey & L. O’Malley. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. Theory Pract. 8, 19–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. J. Van Eck & L. Waltman. Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 [Google Scholar]
- N. J. Van Eck & L. Waltman. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.17. Universiteit Leiden CWTS (2021). http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf [Google Scholar]
- N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, & W. Marc. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 133, 285–296 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O. Ellegaard, J. A. Wallin. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 105, 1809–1831 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192015-1645-z [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. J. D. Peters, C. Marnie, H. Colquhoun. et al. Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Syst. Rev. 10, 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Baas, M. Schotten, A. Plume, et al. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1, 377–386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. S. Ballew. Elsevier’s Scopus® Database. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 6, 245–252 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/15424060903167252 [Google Scholar]
- A. Wijaya, N. A. Setiawan, M. I. Shapiai. Mapping Research Themes and Future Directions in Learning Style Detection Research: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Electron. J. e-Learning 21, 274–285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.4.3097 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Carcassi, G. Sbardolini. Assertion, denial, and the evolution of Boolean operators. Mind Lang. 1, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12448 [Google Scholar]
- M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Szomszor, J. Adams, R. Fry, et al. Interpreting Bibliometric Data. Front. Res. Metrics Anal. 5, 1–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.628703 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. J. van Eck, L. Waltman. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A. Borja, M. Elliott, O. C. Basurko, et al. #OceanOptimism: Balancing the Narrative About the Future of the Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.886027 [Google Scholar]
- L. Wang, W. Niu, L. Ding, Z. Zhao. A bibliometric review on marine economy: Current status, development and future directions. Mar. Policy 155, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105705 [Google Scholar]
- J. I. Barradas, N. P. Ghilardi-Lopes. A case study using the New Ecological Paradigm scale to evaluate coastal and marine environmental perception in the Greater São Paulo (Brazil). Ocean Coast. Manag. 191, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105177 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Freitas, A. Bellgrove, P. Venzo, P. Francis. Towards a 2025 National Ocean Literacy Strategy: Current Status and Future Needs in Primary Education. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.883524 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. E. Herbert-Read, A. Thornton, D. J. Amon, et al. A global horizon scan of issues impacting marine and coastal biodiversity conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1262–1270 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01812-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Peng, D. Wang, Y. Cai. Assessing ecological vulnerability under climate change and anthropogenic influence in the Yangtze River estuarine island-Chongming Island, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 11642 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111642 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. A. Paulus, A. Fauzi, D. Adar. Analyzing Community Perception of Protected Areas to Effectively Mitigate Environmental Risks Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Case of Savu Sea National Marine Park, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Sustain. 15, 16498 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316498 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. La Bianca, S. Rees, M. J. Attrill, et al. A standardised ecosystem services framework for the deep sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1176230 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Brewington, K. Kokame, N. Lewis. A changing climate and its implications for health and migration in the Pacific: Examples from the Marshall Islands. Asia Pacific Issues 149, 1–8 (2021). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85118894177&partnerID=40&md5=ab15944e4d52bf4ca6fbb58a858f3769 [Google Scholar]
- R. Nag. A methodological framework for ranking communicable and noncommunicable diseases due to climate change – A focus on Ireland. Sci. Total Environ. 880, 163296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163296 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- U. L. Dano, I. R. Abubakar, F. S. AlShihri, et al. A multi-criteria assessment of climate change impacts on urban sustainability in Dammam Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Eng. J. 14, 102062 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.102062 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Bloetscher, C. Polsky, K. Bolter, et al. Assessing potential impacts of sea level rise on public health and vulnerable populations in Southeast Florida and providing a framework to improve outcomes. Sustain. 8, 0315 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040315 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Salazar-Sepúlveda, A. Vega-Muñoz, N. Contreras-Barraza. et al. Bibliometric Analysis on Ocean Literacy Studies for Marine Conservation. Water (Switzerland) 15, 12095 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112095 [Google Scholar]
- M. Ashley, S. Pahl, G. Glegg, S. Fletcher. A change of mind: Applying social and behavioral research methods to the assessment of the effectiveness of ocean literacy initiatives. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00288 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. O’Halloran, M. Silver. Awareness of ocean literacy principles and ocean conservation engagement among American adults. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.976006 [Google Scholar]
- D. Laffoley, J. M. Baxter, D. J. Amon, et al. Evolving the narrative for protecting a rapidly changing ocean, post-COVID-19. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 31, 1512–1534 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3512 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J. Babinard, C. J. Bennett, M. E. Hatziolos, et al. Sustainably managing natural resources and the need for construction materials in Pacific island countries: The example of South Tarawa, Kiribati. Nat. Resour. Forum 38, 58–66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12035 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- U. Pascual, P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, et al. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26-27, 7–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Temmerman. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 504, 79–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12859 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- S. Stoll-Kleemann. Feasible Options for Behavior Change Toward More Effective Ocean Literacy: A Systematic Review. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00273 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.