Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 133, 2024
The 5th International Conference on Public Health for Tropical and Coastal Development (ICOPH-TCD 2024)
Article Number 00028
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413300028
Published online 06 November 2024
  • Y. Li, Q. An, Z. Sun, X. Gao, and H. Wang, “Distribution areas and monthly dynamic distribution changes of three Aedes species in China: Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Aedes vexans,” Parasites and Vectors, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–10, (2023), doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05924-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Harapan, A. Michie, M. Mudatsir, R. T. Sasmono, and A. Imrie, “Epidemiology of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Indonesia: Analysis of five decades data from the National Disease Surveillance,” BMC Res. Notes, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 4–9, (2019), doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4379-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Arunachalam et al., “Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: A multicountry study in urban and periurban Asia,” Bull. World Health Organ., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 173–184, (2010), doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067892. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Mitchell-Foster et al., “Integrating participatory community mobilization processes to improve dengue prevention: An eco-bio-social scaling up of local success in Machala, Ecuador,” Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 126–133, (2015), doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Siyam et al., “Eco-health survey effort to diagnose readiness for sustainability dengue prevention and control,” Int. J. Public Heal. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 898–908, (2023), doi: 10.11591/ijphs.v12i2.22797. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Udayanga, N. Gunathilaka, M. C. M. Iqbal, K. Pahalagedara, U. S. Amarasinghe, and W. Abeyewickreme, “Socio-economic, Knowledge Attitude Practices (KAP), household related and demographic based appearance of non-dengue infected individuals in high dengue risk areas of Kandy District, Sri Lanka,” BMC Infect. Dis., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–14, (2018), doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2995-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. N. Paradkar, P. R. Sahasrabudhe, M. G. Sawant, S. Mukherjee, and K. R. Blasdell, “Towards integrated management of dengue in Mumbai,” Viruses, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1–15, (2021), doi: 10.3390/v13122436. [Google Scholar]
  • M. A. F. Mahmud et al., “Environmental management for dengue control: A systematic review protocol,” BMJ Open, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–4, (2019), doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • K. L. Anders et al., “Reduced dengue incidence following deployments of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: A quasiexperimental trial using controlled interrupted time series analysis,” Gates Open Res., vol. 4, no. May, pp. 1–16, (2020), doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13122.1. [Google Scholar]
  • K. L. Anders et al., “Update to the AWED (Applying Wolbachia to Eliminate Dengue) trial study protocol: A cluster randomised controlled trial in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Trials, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–5, (2020), doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04367-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Buchori, A. Mawan, I. Nurhayati, A. Aryati, H. Kusnanto, and U. K. Hadi, “Risk Assessment on the Release of Wolbachia-Infected Aedes aegypti in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Insects, vol. 13, no. 10, (2022), doi: 10.3390/insects13100924. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Heydari et al., “Household dengue prevention interventions, expenditures, and barriers to Aedes aegypti control in Machala, Ecuador,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–15, (2017), doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020196. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Kenneson et al., “Social-ecological factors and preventive actions decrease the risk of dengue infection at the household-level: Results from a prospective dengue surveillance study in Machala, Ecuador,” PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1–19, (2017), doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006150. [Google Scholar]
  • A. A. Shafie, E. D. Moreira, A. Di Pasquale, D. Demuth, and J. Y. S. Yin, “Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices toward Dengue Fever, Vector Control, and Vaccine Acceptance Among the General Population in Countries from Latin America and Asia Pacific: A Cross-Sectional Study (GEMKAP),” Vaccines, vol. 11, no. 3, (2023), doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Quintero, N. R. Pulido, J. Logan, T. Ant, J. Bruce, and G. Carrasquilla, “Effectiveness of an intervention for Aedes aegypti control scaled-up under an intersectoral approach in a Colombian city hyperendemic for dengue virus,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–16, (2020), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230486. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Lun et al., “Effects of the source of information and knowledge of dengue fever on the mosquito control behavior of residents of border areas of Yunnan, China,” Parasites and Vectors, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–11, (2023), doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05916-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Echaubard et al., “Fostering social innovation and building adaptive capacity for dengue control in Cambodia: A case study,” Infect. Dis. Poverty, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, (2020), doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00734-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. F. Arham et al., “Participatory: Stakeholder’s Engagement Toward Dengue Control Techniques in Klang Valley, Malaysia,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 1, (2021), doi: 10.1177/2158244020982605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Siyam, D. M. Sukendra, and Y. Santik, Community social capital dalam Memerangi Demam Berdarah (DBD). Semarang: FIK, (2021). doi: 10.4324/9780203882313. [Google Scholar]
  • E. S. Sulaeman, Reviono, and A. Setyowati, “Modal Sosial Kader Kesehatan dan Kepemimpinan Tokoh Masyarakat Dalam Penemuan Penderita Tuberkulosis,” J. Kedokt., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 20–41, (2016), [Online]. Available: http://www.academicjournal.yarsi.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-fk-yarsi/article/view/125 [Google Scholar]
  • V. Alvarado-Castro et al., “Social capital is associated with lower mosquito vector indices: Secondary analysis from a cluster randomised controlled trial of community mobilisation for dengue prevention in Mexico,” Popul. Health Metr., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–11, (2019), doi: 10.1186/s12963-019-0199-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. R. Haddaway, M. J. Page, C. C. Pritchard, and L. A. McGuinness, “PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.,” Campbell Syst. Rev., vol. 18, no. 2, p. e1230, Jun. (2022), doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Asri, K. Nuntaboot, and P. Festi Wiliyanarti, “Community social capital on fighting dengue fever in suburban Surabaya, Indonesia: A qualitative study,” Int. J. Nurs. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 374–377, (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.10.003. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Siyam, D. M. Sukendra, and Y. D. P. Santik, “The Social Capital of Health Cadres and Community Figures in Overcoming DHF at Endemic Areas,” Stud. Ethno-Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1–2, pp. 24–36, (2022), doi: 10.31901/24566772.2022/16.1-2.645. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Kasjono Subaris, H. S. Kasjono, and M. H. Bakri, “Effect of Counseling Using Social Capital Implementation on Container Index (CI) of Aedes aegypti Larvae,” vol. 13, no. Ichs 2018, pp. 129–137, (2019), doi: 10.2991/ichs-18.2019.17. [Google Scholar]
  • T. W. Sukesi, T. B. T. Satoto, E. H. Murhandarwati, and R. S. Padmawati, “Effects of health education based intervention on community’s perception, healthy house, and social capital of dengue in endemic area of sleman regency indonesia,” Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 428–436, (2021), doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Subaris, S. Subiyanto, D. Tri Kartono, and E. Lestary, “Social Capital Capacity as Prediction of Dengue Control,” Int. J. Public Heal. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 111, (2016), doi: 10.11591/ijphs.v5i1.4772. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Caprara et al., “Entomological impact and social participation in dengue control: A cluster randomized trial in Fortaleza, Brazil,” Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 99–105, (2015), doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Nguyen-Tien, A. Probandari, and R. A. Ahmad, “Barriers to engaging communities in a dengue vector control program: An implementation research in an urban area in Hanoi city, Vietnam,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 964–973, (2019), doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0411. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • S. F. de Macêdo et al., “Scaling up of eco-bio-social strategy to control aedes aegypti in highly vulnerable areas in Fortaleza, Brazil: A cluster, non-randomized controlled trial protocol,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–23, (2021), doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031278. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Holston, H. Suazo-Laguna, E. Harris, and J. Coloma, “DengueChat: A Social and Software Platform for Community-based Arbovirus Vector Control,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1521–1535, (2021), doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O. Nontapet et al., “Understanding dengue solution and larval indices surveillance system among village health volunteers in highand low-risk dengue villages in southern Thailand,” One Heal., vol. 15, no. May, p. 100440, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100440. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Villalonga-Olives, T. R. Wind, and I. Kawachi, “Social capital interventions in public health: A systematic review.,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 212, pp. 203–218, Sep. (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Suwanbamrung et al., “Developing and using a dengue patient care guideline for patients admitted from households to primary care units and the district hospital: A community participatory approach in Southern Thailand,” One Heal., vol. 10, no. April, p. 100168, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Sayono, W. Widoyono, D. Sumanto, and R. Rokhani, “Impact of dengue surveillance workers on community participation and satisfaction of dengue virus control measures in Semarang Municipality, Indonesia: A policy breakthrough in public health action,” Osong Public Heal. Res. Perspect., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 376–384, (2019), doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.6.08. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • M. O. Lwin et al., “Influence of public hesitancy and receptivity on reactive behaviours towards releases of male Wolbachia-Aedes mosquitoes for dengue control,” PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1–16, (2022), doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010910. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.