Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 137, 2024
International Conference of Biotechnology on Community Development (ICBCD 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01013 | |
| Number of page(s) | 14 | |
| Section | Agriculture Technology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413701013 | |
| Published online | 11 November 2024 | |
- L. Delaby, F. Buckley, N. McHugh, and F. Blanc, “Robust animals for grass based production systems,” 2018, vol. 23: Wageningen Academic Publishers, p. np. [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Altieri, F. R. Funes-Monzote, and P. Petersen, “Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty,” Agronomy for sustainable development, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Anteneh, “Effects of Fertilizer Types on Agronomic Performance and Chemical Composition of Rhodes Grass (Chloris gayana) at Bahir Dar, Northwestern Ethiopia,” 2020. [Google Scholar]
- S. R. Silva et al., “Extensive sheep and goat production: The role of novel technologies towards sustainability and animal welfare,” Animals, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 885, 2022. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- S. Lockie et al., The future of agricultural technologies. Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA), 2020. [Google Scholar]
- C. Ramulu et al., “A residue management machine for chopping paddy residues in combine harvested paddy field,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 5077, 2023. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E. C. Bagaihing, D. P. Mangesa, and J. S. Bale, “Feasibility Study of Production of Double Blade Grass Cutting Machine,” International Journal of Business, Technology and Organizational Behavior (IJBTOB), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 183-194, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. Hanafi and A. S. Nurrohkayati, “Analysis of the Design of the Palm Frond Chopping Machine as a Basic Ingredient for Animal Feed,” Procedia of Engineering and Life Science, vol. 3, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- J. F. Nipa, M. H. T. Mondal, and M. A. Islam, “Design, development and performance evaluation of small-scale fodder chopping machine for farmers,” 2021. [Google Scholar]
- W. Sugandi and T. Herwanto, “Test performance and economic analysis of straw chopper machine,” 2019, vol. 334: IOP Publishing, 1 ed., p. 012001. [Google Scholar]
- K. D. Astanakulov, S. Gapparov, F. Karshiev, A. Makhsumkhonova, and D. Khudaynazarov, “Study on preparation and distribution of forage by chopping coarse fodder,” 2020, vol. 614: IOP Publishing, 1 ed., p. 012158. [Google Scholar]
- B. Krone, J. Hummel, A. Riek, M. Clauss, and M. Hünerberg, “Comparative study of feeding and rumination behaviour of goats and sheep fed mixed grass hay of different chop length,” Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 700-710, 2024. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A. Sucipto, A. Kurnia, A. Halim, and A. P. Irawan, “Design and fabrication of multipurpose organic chopper machine,” 2020, vol. 725: IOP Publishing, 1 ed., p. 012021. [Google Scholar]
- S. Gapparov and F. Karshiev, “Development chopper device that chops baled rough fodders,” 2020, vol. 883: IOP Publishing, 1 ed., p. 012158. [Google Scholar]
- I. Hotea, M. Dragomirescu, A. Berbecea, and I. Radulov, “The Role of Nutrition in Enhancing Sustainability in Sheep Production,” 2023. [Google Scholar]
- P. W. Braden, Serve the People: Bovine Experiences in China's Civil War and Revolution, 1935-1961. University of California, San Diego, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- S. Bhoj et al., “Mechanization of livestock farms,” in Engineering Applications in Livestock Production: Elsevier, 2024, pp. 207-242. [Google Scholar]
- N. H. M. Girma, “Review on Opportunities of Developing Biotechnology in Animal Feed Improvement and Major Constraints Hinder Biotechnology in Developing Countries,” way, vol. 52, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.