Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 137, 2024
International Conference of Biotechnology on Community Development (ICBCD 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02016 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Bioengineering & Biomedical | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413702016 | |
| Published online | 11 November 2024 | |
- C. Candia, J. Pulgar, and F. L. Pinheiro, “Interconnectedness in education systems,” Handb. Comput. Soc. Sci., pp. 1–26, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- D. McNab, J. McKay, S. Shorrock, S. Luty, and P. Bowie, “Development and application of systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement,” BMJ Open Qual., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000714. [Google Scholar]
- A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, no. May, pp. 275–285, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. J. Wiedermann, V. Barbieri, B. Plagg, P. Marino, G. Piccoliori, and A. Engl, “Fortifying the Foundations: A Comprehensive Approach to Enhancing Mental Health Support in Educational Policies Amidst Crises,” Healthc., vol. 11, no. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101423. [Google Scholar]
- E. Sabrina, M. Giatman, and E. Ernawati, “Development of curriculum management in the world of education,” Fair Value J. Ilm. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 4691–4696, 2022, doi: 10.32670/fairvalue.v4i10.1741. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Kim, M. Raza, and E. Seidman, “Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners,” Res. Comp. Int. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 99–117, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1745499919829214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Drake and J. Reid, “Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st Century Capabilities,” Asia Pacific J. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–50, 2018, doi: 10.30777/apjer.2018.1.1.03. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. van Diggele, A. Burgess, and C. Mellis, “Planning, preparing and structuring a small group teaching session,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 20, no. Suppl 2, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02281-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Mumu, B. Tanujaya, R. Charitas, and I. Prahmana, “Likert Scale in Social Sciences Research: Problems and Difficulties,” FWU J. Soc. Sci., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 89–101, 2022, doi: 10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/7. [Google Scholar]
- M. Seong, J. Park, S. Chung, and S. Sok, “Development of the adult pandemic attitude scale (A-PAS),” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126311. [Google Scholar]
- A. T. Jebb, V. Ng, and L. Tay, “A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. 637547, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Abdi and D. Rahmania, “The effect of learning interest and self-efficacy on junior high school students’ learning achievement,” ProGCouns J. Prof. Guid. Couns., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2023, doi: 10.21831/progcouns.v4i1.53757. [Google Scholar]
- A. Asrial, M. Maison, and R. Perdana, “A study of junior high school students’ attitudes and learning motivation on science process,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2745–2759, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i8.7816. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Zhong and T. Li, “Can Pair Learning Improve Students’ Troubleshooting Performance in Robotics Education?,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 220–248, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0735633119829191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Zhong and Q. Si, “Troubleshooting to Learn via Scaffolds: Effect on Students’ Ability and Cognitive Load in a Robotics Course,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 95–118, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0735633120951871. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Desai, A. Gupta, L. Andersen, B. Ronnestrand, and M. Wong, “Stress-Reducing Effects of Playing a Casual Video Game among Undergraduate Students,” Trends Psychol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 563–579, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s43076-021-00062-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. R. Qu and P. K. Fok, “Cultivating students’ computational thinking through student–robot interactions in robotics education,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1983–2002, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10798-021-09677-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Çakır, Ö. Korkmaz, Ö. İdil, and F. Uğur Erdoğmuş, “The effect of robotic coding education on preschoolers’ problem solving and creative thinking skills,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 40, no. March, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100812. [Google Scholar]
- A. Muhlisin, S. Sarwanti, G. Jalunggono, A. Yusliwidaka, S. Mazid, and L. E. Mohtar, “Improving students’ problem-solving skills through RIAS model in science classes,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 284–294, 2022, doi: 10.21831/cp.v41i1.47263. [Google Scholar]
- E. Bakala, A. Gerosa, J. P. Hourcade, and G. Tejera, “Preschool children, robots, and computational thinking: A systematic review,” Int. J. Child-Computer Interact., vol. 29, p. 100337, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.