The rational choice of vegetable farmers in the revocation of fertilizer subsidies

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 143, 2024 The 5^th International Conference on Bioenergy and Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture Technology (ICoN-BEAT 2024)


Article Number		01019
Number of page(s)		9
Section		Agriculture and Forestry
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414301019
Published online		25 November 2024

OECD. Food and Agriculture Organization of the united nations agricultural and food markets: trends and prospects 2, 20–85 (2022). https://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/e4a3f0ecen.pdf?expires=1728043349&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=1490420A81048F7D6CBA332FD2DC674D. [Google Scholar]
O.R. Prasetyoa, K. Kadira. Does government assistance increase the yield of food crops in Indonesia? Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia 13 (1), 25–41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v13i1.37. [Google Scholar]
A. Rifin, F. Feryanto, H. Herawati. Effect of fertiliser subsidy on fertiliser usage in rice farming in Indonesia. BIO Web of Conferences 119, 01009 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20241190100. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
A. Jamil, M. Saleh, S. Ali, I.M. Fahmid, D. Salman, R. Rahmadanih. Subsidized fertilizer management in the rice production centers of South Sulawesi, Indonesia: bridging the gap between policy and practice. Journal Open Agriculture, 8(1) (2023) pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-023. [Google Scholar]
I.M. Fahmid, A. Jamil, Wahyudi, A. Agustian, M. Hatta, R. Aldillah R, Study of the impact of increasing the highest retail price of subsidized fertilizer on rice production in Indonesia. Open Agriculture. 7, 348–359 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
H. Maulidy, W. Wardah, M.I. Ansari, A study on the unlawful act in subsidized fertilizer sales in blang pidie. Kanun J Ilmu Huk. 24 (2), 167–79 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Mikhail, S. Sokolov. A sociology of regret. European Journal of Social Theory 26(1) (2023) pp 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431022111939. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
J.W.V. Zanden, The social experience an introduction to sociology, (First Edit, Random House Press, New York, USA, (1988) [Google Scholar]
G.K. Vondolia, H. Eggert, J. Stage, The effect of fertilizer subsidies on investment in soil and water conservation and productivity among Ghanaian farmers using mechanized irrigation. Sustain. 13(15) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158242. [Google Scholar]
R.M. Rukka, R. Darma, D. Rukmana, M. Arsyad, N.P. Anriany, L. Alwi, Effectiveness of subsidized fertilizer distribution to a rice farmer in Lemoe, Bacukiki District, Parepare, South Sulawesi. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 807, 0–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Nur, Hardianti, J. Ahmad, M. Syaharuddin, A. Kasim, Fertilizer subsidy policy implementation evaluation government onion farmers increase productivity in Enrekang. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 29, 5301–5312 (2020). [Google Scholar]
G. Ritzer, B. Smart, The hand book of social theory, (First Edit: SAGE Publication Ltd, London, 2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
G. Ritzer, J. Stepnisky, classical sociological theory, (SAGE Publication Ltd, New York, 2018). [Google Scholar]
J. Levin, P. Milgrom, Introduction to choice theory, (First edit, New York, 2004). [Google Scholar]
F.B. Qiao, J.K. Huang, Farmers’ risk preference and fertilizer use. J Integr Agric. 20, 1987–1995 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63450-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Asworth, Scott. Explanation, formal models, and rational choice. Journal of Theoritical Politic Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 328–343 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629824127096. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sullivan, Teresa A; Cork, Daniel L. Assessing the 2020 Census: Final Report. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2715. [Google Scholar]
N. Mack, C. Woodsong, Qualitative methods, (First: United Agency for International Development, (2005). [Google Scholar]
S.R. Khanker, G.B. Koolwal, H.A. Samad, Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices, (First Edit, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2010). [Google Scholar]
K.M. Horrigan, M. Millar, M. Dowling, Understanding the key tenets of heidegger’s philosophy for interpretive phenomenological research. Int J Qual Methods. 15, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916680634. [Google Scholar]
I. Ahmad, M.R. Islam. Building strong communities: ethical approaches to inclusive development, (Diverse Perspectives on Creating a Fairer Society, Indonesia, 2024). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
T.W. Nugroho. Does social capital improve food security? evidence from the Indonesian Family Life Survey. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 12(2) (2022) pp 138–147. 10.55493/5005.v12i2.4502 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Inayah, S. Erma. Alternative solutions for subsidized fertilizer distribution in South Sulawesi: a system thinking approach. AIP Conference Proceeding. 3047, 040002 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.019537. [Google Scholar]
A.M. Hasibuan, Y. Ferry, S. Wulandari, Factors affecting farmers’ decision to use organic fertilizers on robusta coffee plantation: a case study in Tanggamus, Lampung. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 974 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/17551315/974/1/012105. [Google Scholar]
M. Eida, P. Division, Impact and possible response to high fertilizers prices, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Washington DC, 2022). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.