Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2024
2nd Biology Trunojoyo Madura International Conference (BTMIC 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01056 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Dense Matter | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414601056 | |
| Published online | 27 November 2024 | |
- S. R. Butler, H. W. Marsh, M. J. Sheppard, and J. L. Sheppard, Seven-year longitudinal study of the early prediction of reading achievement, J. Educ. Psychol., 77, 3, 349–361, (1985), doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.349 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. W. Stevenson and R. S., Newman, Long-Term Prediction of Achievement and Attitudes in Mathematics and Reading, Child Dev., 57, 3, 646–659, (1986), doi: 10.2307/1130343 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Aakash and A. G. Aggarwal, Assessment of Hotel Performance and Guest Satisfaction through eWOM: Big Data for Better Insights, Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm., 23, 2, 317–346, (2022), doi: 10.1080/15256480.2020.1746218 [Google Scholar]
- M. F. Manesh, M. M. Pellegrini, G. Marzi, and M. Dabic, Knowledge Management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Mapping the Literature and Scoping Future Avenues, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 68, 1, 289–300, (2021), doi: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2963489 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Garoufallou, R. Siatri, G. Zafeiriou, and E. Balampanidou, The use of marketing concepts in library services: a literature review, Libr. Rev., 62, 4/5, 312–334, (2013), doi: 10.1108/LR-06-2012-0061 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Gul and S. Bano, Smart libraries: an emerging and innovative technological habitat of 21st century, Electron. Libr., 37, 5, 764–783, (2019), doi: 10.1108/EL-02-2019-0052 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Martini, The Data Revolution. Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences, Reg. Stud., 50, 3, 553–554, (2016), doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1107987 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Pourjahanshahi, A. Mollahosseini, and S. Dehyadegari, Website quality and users ’ intention to use digital libraries: Examining users ’ attitudes, online co-creation experiences, and eWOM, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 74, 103393, (2023), doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103393 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Bhattacharya, Advances in digital library initiatives: a developing country perspective, Int. Inf. Libr. Rev., 36, 3, 165–175, (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.iilr.2003.10.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Sun and B.-Z. Yuan, Development and Characteristic of Digital Library as a Library Branch, IERI Procedia, 2, 12–17, (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2012.06.044 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Ramos-Vidal, A. Cortinas, M. R. Luaces, O. Pedreira, and A. Saavedra-Places, Development of Digital Libraries with Software Product Line Engineering, J. Web Eng., 20, 7, 2017–2058, (2021), doi: 10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2072 [Google Scholar]
- N. Nissim et al., Sec-lib: Protecting scholarly digital libraries from infected papers using active machine learning framework, IEEE Access, 7, 110050–110073, (2019), doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933197 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Ylipulli, M. Pouke, N. Ehrenberg, and T. Keinonen, Public libraries as a partner in digital innovation project: Designing a virtual reality experience to support digital literacy, Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., 149, 594–605, (2023), doi: 10.1016/j.future.2023.08.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Sediyaningsih, M. P. Ristiyono, K. Launggu, and P. Ochieng Juma, De-contextual communication: Factors influencing usage intentions of metaverse technology in digital library services, Heliyon, 9, 10, e20388, (2023), doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20388 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R. E. Giachetti, Design of Enterprise Systems: Theory, Architecture, and Methods, Boca Raton: CRC Press, (2010) [Google Scholar]
- W. S. Davis and D. C. Yen, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook: Systems Analysis and Design, Boca Raton: CRC Press, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. de Brock, Developing Information Systems Accurately A Wholistic Approach, Springer International Publishing, (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Sharma, C. Gupta, P. Agrawal, S. Kautish, S. Nanda, and V. Madaan, Knowledge Engineering for Modern Information Systems: Methods, Models and Tools, De Gruyter, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Rohit, Object Oriented Programming with C++, 2nd Edition, New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- C. Doom, An Introduction to Business Information Management, Brussels: Academic & Scientific Publishers, (2009) [Google Scholar]
- J. Carlson and A. O’Cass, Exploring the relationships between e-service quality, satisfaction, attitudes and behaviours in content-driven e-service web sites, J. Serv. Mark., 24, 2, 112–127, (2010), doi: 10.1108/08876041011031091 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Jimenez-Barreto and S. Campo-Martinez, Destination website quality, users ’ attitudes and the willingness to participate in online co-creation experiences, Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ., 27, 1, 26–41, (2018), doi: 10.1108/EJMBE-11-2017-0048 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Cao et al., Barriers and Enablers to the Implementation of Intelligent Guidance Systems for Patients in Chinese Tertiary Transfer Hospitals: Usability Evaluation, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 70, 8, 2634–2643, (2023), doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3066564 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Saad, A. Zia, M. Raza, M. Kundi, and M. Haleem, A Comprehensive Analysis of Healthcare Websites Usability Features, Testing Techniques and Issues, IEEE Access, 10, 97701–97718, (2022), doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193378 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Riady, M. Sofwan, M. Mailizar, T. M. Alqahtani, L. N. Yaqin, and A. Habibi, How can we assess the success of information technologies in digital libraries? Empirical evidence from Indonesia, Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, 3, 2, 100192, (2023), doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.10019 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.