Sow and piglet behaviour during lactation: A review focusing on selected behaviour manifested by foster sows and their fostered piglets

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 167, 2025 5^th International Conference on Smart and Innovative Agriculture (ICoSIA 2024)


Article Number		06007
Number of page(s)		12
Section		Smart Genetics Resource Management and Utilization
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202516706007
Published online		19 March 2025

A. Balzani, H.J Cordell, S.S Edwards, Relationship of sow udder morphology with piglet suckling behaviour and teat access. Theriogenology. 86, (2016). [Google Scholar]
L. Pajzlar, J. Skok, Cross-fostering into smaller or older litter makes piglets integration difficult: Suckling stability-based rationale. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 220, 104856.(2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Australian Pork Limited APL project 2016/2237, Cross fostering guidelines for Australian farrowing houses, 2017. [Google Scholar]
S. Robert, G.P Martineau, Effects of repeated cross-fosterings on preweaning behavior and growth performance of piglets and on maternal behavior of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 79, (2001). https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79188x [Google Scholar]
E. M Baxter, K.M.D Rutherford, R.B D’eath, G. Arnott, S. PTurner, P. Sandoe, A.B Lawrence, The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: management factors. Anim. Welf. 22, (2013). [Google Scholar]
C. Kobek-Kjeldager, V.A Moustsen, P.K Theil, L.J Pedersen, Managing large litters: Selected measures of performance in 10 intermediate nurse sows and welfare of foster piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 233, 105149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105149 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
F. P Bortolozzo, G.P Zanin, R. Ulguim, A. P.G Mellagi, Managing Reproduction in Hyperprolific Sow Herds. Animals. 13, 13111842 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111842 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
K. Portele, K. Scheck, S. Siegmann, R. Feitsch, K. Maschat, J.L Rault, I. Camerlink, Sow-piglet nose contacts in free-farrowing pens. Animals. 9,(2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080513 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
C. Clouard, R. Resmond, A. Prunier, C. Tallet, E. Merlot, Exploration of early social behaviors and social styles in relation to individual characteristics in suckling piglets. Science Reports-UK, 12, (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06354-w [Google Scholar]
L. Loftus, G. Bell, E. Padmore, S. Atkinson, A. Henworth, M. Hoyle, The effect of two different farrowing systems on sow behaviour, and piglet behaviour, mortality and growth. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 232, 105102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
H. B Rooney, O. Schmitt, A. Courty, P.G Lawlor, K. O’Driscoll, Like mother like child: do fearful sows have fearful piglets?. Animals. 11, (2021). [Google Scholar]
M. Ocepek, I.L Andersen, Sow communication with piglets while being active is a good predictor of maternal skills, piglet survival and litter quality in three different breeds of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus). PLoS One, 13, (2018) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206128. [Google Scholar]
L. Blavi, D. Sola-Oriol, P. Llonch, S. López-Vergé, S.M Martín-Orúe, J.F Pérez, Management and feeding strategies in early life to increase piglet performance and welfare around weaning: A review. Animals. 11, (2021). [Google Scholar]
A.K Johnson, J.L Rault, J.N Marchant, E.M Baxter, K. O’Driscoll, Improving young pig welfare on-farm: The Five Domains Model. J. Anim. Sci. 100, (2022). [Google Scholar]
I. Camerlink, M. Farish, R.B D’eath, G. Arnott, S.P Turner, Long term benefits on social behaviour after early life socialization of piglets. Animals, 8, 8110192 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110192 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
L.C Salazar, H.L Ko, C. Yang, L. Llonch, X. Manteca, I. Camerlink, P. Llonch, Early socialisation as a strategy to increase piglets’ social skills in intensive farming conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 206,(2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.033 [Google Scholar]
J.G Alexopoulos, D.S Lines, S Hallett, K.J Plush, A review of success factors for piglet fostering in lactation. Animals. 8, (2018). [Google Scholar]
K.M.D Rutherford, E.M Baxter, R.B D’eath, S.P Turner, G. Arnott, R. Roehe, A.B Lawrence, B. The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors. Anim. Welf. 22,(2013) https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.199 [Google Scholar]
E. M Baxter, O. Schmitt, L.J Pedersen, Managing the litter from hyperprolific sows. In The suckling and weaned piglet, Wageningen Academic Publishers. (2020): https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-894-0_3 [Google Scholar]
B. Puppe, A. Tuchscherer, The development of suckling frequency in pigs from birth to weaning of their piglets: a sociobiological approach. J. Anim. Sci. 72,(2000) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055119 [Google Scholar]
S. Kasanen, B. Algers, (2002). A note on the effects of additional sow gruntings on suckling behaviour in piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav.Sci. 75, (2002). [Google Scholar]
R. Y Lohmeier, C.G.E Gimberg-Henrici, O. Burfeind, J. Krieter, Suckling behaviour and health parameters of sows and piglets in free- farrowing pens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 211, (2019). [Google Scholar]
E.M Rosvold, R.C Newberry, I.L Andersen, Early mother-young interactions in domestic sows - Nest-building material increases maternal investment. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci. 219, 104837 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104837 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M.L Pedersen, V.A Moustsen, M.B.F Nielsen, A.R Kristensen, Improved udder access prolongs duration of milk letdown and increases piglet weight gain. Livest. Sci. 140,(2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.04.001 [Google Scholar]
R.I King, S.M Matheson, E.M Baxter, S. A Edwards, Sow behaviour and piglet weight gain after late cross-fostering in farrowing crates and pen, Animal. 14,(2020) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000580 [Google Scholar]
O. Schmitt, E.M Baxter, L.A Boyle, K. O’Driscoll, Nurse sow strategies in the domestic pig: I. Consequences for selected measures of sow welfare. Animal. 13,(2019a) https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111800160X [Google Scholar]
J. Skok, D. Skorjanc, Group suckling cohesion as a prelude to the formation of teat order in piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 154, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. I Horrell, Immediate behavioural consequences of fostering 1-week-old piglets. J. Agric. Sci. 99,(1982) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600030100 [Google Scholar]
E.T Gieling, R.E Nordquist, F.J van der Staay, Assessing learning and memory in pigs. Anim. Cog. 14,(2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0364-3 [Google Scholar]
G. Heim, A.P.G Mellagi, T. Bierhals, L.P de Souza, H.C.C de Fries, P. Piuco, E. Seidel, M.L Bernardi, I. Wentz, F.P Bortolozzo, (2012) Effects of cross-fostering within 24h after birth on pre-weaning behaviour, growth performance and survival rate of biological and adopted piglets. Lives. Sci. 150,(2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.08.011 [Google Scholar]
L. Lidfors, C. Berg, B. Algers, Integration of natural behavior in housing systems. AMBIO: A J. Hum Environ. 34, (2005). [Google Scholar]
C. J Mayerl, R.Z German, Evolution, diversification and function of the maternal-infant dyad in mammalian feeding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 378, (2023). [Google Scholar]
H. Telkanranta, S.A Edwards, Lifetime consequences of the early physical and social environment of piglets. In Advances in Pig Welfare. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00013-7 [Google Scholar]
K.L Chidgey, P.C Morel, K.J Stafford, I.W Barugh, The performance and behaviour of gilts and their piglets is influenced by whether they were born and reared in farrowing crates or farrowing pens. Livest. Sci. 193, (2016). [Google Scholar]
G. Miguel-Pacheco, Y.M Seddon, Developmental influences on pig behaviour. In Understanding the behaviour and improving the welfare of pig. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing. (2021) [Google Scholar]
O. Schmitt, E.M Baxter, L.A Boyle, K. O’driscoll, Nurse sow strategies in the domestic pig: II. Consequences for piglet growth, suckling behaviour and sow nursing behaviour. Animal. 13,(2019b) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001702 [Google Scholar]
A. E Valros, M. Rundgren, M. Spinka, H. Saloniemi, L. Rydhmer, B. Algers, Nursing behaviour of sows during 5 weeks lactation and effects on piglet growth. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76,(2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00006-0 [Google Scholar]
J. Maletinska, M. Spinka, J. Vichova, I. Stehulova, Individual recognition of piglets by sows in the early post-partum period. Behav. 139, (2002). [Google Scholar]
S.A Ward, R.N Kirkwood, K.J Plush, Are larger litters a concern for piglet survival or an effectively manageable trait?. Animals. 10, (2020). [Google Scholar]
X. Zhang, M. Wang, T. He, S. Long, Y. Guo, Z. Chen, Effect of different cross-fostering strategies on growth performance, stress status and immunoglobulin of piglets. Animals. 11, (2021). [Google Scholar]
M. Spinka, G. Illmann, B. Algers, Z. Stetkova, The role of nursing frequency in milk production in domestic pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 75, (1997). [Google Scholar]
L.J Pedersen, M. Studnitz, K.H Jensen, A.M Giersing, Suckling behaviour of piglets in relation to accessibility to the sow and the presence of foreign litters. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58,(1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00149-4 [Google Scholar]
E. M Baxter, S.A Hall, M. Farish, J. Donbavand, M. Brims, M. Jack, A.B Lawrence, I. Camerlink, Piglets’ behaviour and performance in relation to sow characteristics. Anima. 17, 100699 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100699 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. Torrey, T.M Widowski, Relationship between growth and non-nutritive massage in suckling pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 107, (2007). [Google Scholar]
M. Spinka, B. Algers, Functional view on udder massage after milk let-down in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 43, (1995). [Google Scholar]
P. Jensen, M. Gustafsson, H. Augustsson, Teat massage after milk ingestion in domestic piglets: An example of honest begging?, Anim. Behav. 55,(1998) https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0651 [Google Scholar]
J. T Sorensen, T. Rousing, A.B Kudahl, H. J Hansted, L.J Pedersen, Do nurse sows and foster litters have impaired animal welfare? Results from a cross-sectional study in sow herds. Animal. 10, (2016). [Google Scholar]
G. P Zanin, L. Santos, D.M.S Tomm, D.F Silveira, F.P Bortolozzo, R.R Ulguim, A.P.G Mellagi, Sow and litter performance after cross-fostering one surplus piglet and co-mingling the litters at early lactation. Animal. 101247(2024). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
I. Dostaikova, M. Spinka, P. Kindlmann, Begging for milk: evolution of teat massaging in suckling pigs. J. Theoret. Biol. 215, (2002). [Google Scholar]
K. Olczak, W. Penar, J. Nowicki, A. Magiera, C. Klocek, The Role of Sound in Livestock Farming— Selected Aspects. Animals. 13, 13142307(2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142307 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
D. Reese, B. Straw, The case against evening- up litters until weaning, Nebraska Swine Reports. 212,(2006) https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1227%26context=coopext_swine [Google Scholar]
P.C Schon, B. Puppe, G. Manteuffel, Automated recording of stress vocalisations as a tool to document impaired welfare in pigs. Anim. Welf. 13,(2004) https://doi.org/10.1017/S096272860002683X [Google Scholar]
A. Drake, D. Fraser, D.M Weary, Parent-offspring resource allocation in domestic pigs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, (2008). [Google Scholar]
J. Skok, Suckling strategies in terrestrial ungulates (Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla) and the factors influencing them: The offspring perspective. CABI Reviews. (2022). [Google Scholar]
E. Collarini, L. Capponcelli, A. Pierdomenico, I. Norscia, G. Cordoni, Sows’ Responses to Piglets in Distress: An Experimental Investigation in a Natural Setting. Animals. 13, (2023). [Google Scholar]
D. M Weary, G.L Lawson, B.K Thompson, Sows Show Stronger Responses to Isolation Calls of Piglets Associated with Greater Levels of Piglet Need. Anim. Behav. 52, (1996). [Google Scholar]
G. Illmann, J. Zacharova, J. Maletinska, I. Stehulova, M. Spinka, M. Nursing Behaviour and Nursing Vocalisations in Domestic Sows: Repeatability and Relationship with Maternal Investment. Behav. 139, (2002) [Google Scholar]
M. C Appleby, D.M Weary, A.A Taylor, G. Illmann, Vocal communication in pigs: Who are nursing piglets screaming at?. Ethol. 105,(1999) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00459.x [Google Scholar]
J. K Blackshaw, A.M Hagelso. Getting-up and lying-down behaviours of loose-housed sows and social contacts between sows and piglets during day 1 and day 8 after parturition. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 25,(1990) [Google Scholar]
H. L Ko, D. Temple, J. Hales, X. Manteca, P. Llonch, Welfare and performance of sows and piglets in farrowing pens with temporary crating system on a Spanish commercial farm. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 246, 105527(2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
K.L Chidgey, P.C Morel, K.J Stafford, I.W Barugh, Sow and piglet behavioral associations in farrowing pens with temporary crating and in farrowing crates. J. Vet. Behav. 20, (2017). [Google Scholar]
B. Algers, K. Uvnas-Moberg, Maternal behavior in pigs. Horm. Behav. 52,(2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.022 [Google Scholar]
L.P Souza, H.C.C Fries, G. Heim, J.E Faccin, L.F Hernig, B.T Marimon, M.L Bernardi, F. P Bortolozzo, I. Wentz, Behaviour and growth performance of low-birth-weight piglets cross-fostered in multiparous sows with piglets of higher birth weights. Arqivo Brasil. Med. Vet. Zootec. 66, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-41626379 [Google Scholar]
E. O Price, G.D Hutson, M.I Price, R. Borgwardt, Fostering in swine as affected by age of offspring. J. Anim. Sci. 72,(1994) https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7271697x [Google Scholar]
M. E Lucas, L.M Hemsworth, P.H Hemsworth, Early life piglet experiences and impacts on immediate and longer-term adaptability. Animal. 100889(2023). [Google Scholar]
N. E O’Connell, V.E Beattie, I.A Sneddon, K. Breuer, J.T Mercer, K.A Rance, M.E.M Sutcliffe, S.A Edwards, Influence of individual predisposition, maternal experience and lactation environment on the responses of pigs to weaning at two different ages. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 90,(2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.012 [Google Scholar]
I. Camerlink, S.P Turner, W.W Ursinus, I. Reimert, J.E Bolhuis, Aggression and affiliation during social conflict in pigs. PLoS ONE. 9,(2014) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113502 [Google Scholar]
J. M Clarkson, E. M Baxter, J. E Martin, Who plays with whom: farrowing environment influences isolation of foster piglets in play. Front. Anim. Sci. 2, 724080(2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M.D Gomboc, J. Skok, D. Skorjanc, M.P Povse, Suckling Behaviour of Piglets Affected by Body Weight and Sex. Agric. Scient. 20,(2023) https://doi.org/10.18690/agricsci.20.1.4 [Google Scholar]
A. N. W Olsen, L. Dybkjaer, K.S Vestergaard, Cross-suckling and associated behaviour in piglets and sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 61,(1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00182-8 [Google Scholar]
J. Skok, D. Skorjanc, Formation of teat order and estimation of piglets’ distribution along the mammary complex using mid-domain effect (MDE) model. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 144,(2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.014 [Google Scholar]
T. Kutzer. B. Bunger. J.B Kjaer. L. Schrader. Effects of early contact between non-littermate piglets and of the complexity of farrowing conditions on social behaviour and weight gain. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 121. (2009). [Google Scholar]
S. Giroux. S. Robert. G.P Martineau. The effects of cross-fostering on growth rate and post-weaning behavior of segregated early-weaned piglets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80. (2000). [Google Scholar]
W. Ji. Y. Bi. Z. Cheng. R. Liu. X. Zhang. Y. Shu. H. Liu. Impact of early socialization environment on social behavior. physiology and growth performance of weaned piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 238. 105314(2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
C. Van Kerschaver. M. Vandaele. J. Degroote. K. Van Tichelen. D. Fremaut. C. Van Ginneken. J. Michiels. Effect of starting time of co-mingling non-littermates during lactation on performance and skin lesions of sows and piglets. Livest. Sci. 250. 104563(2021). [Google Scholar]
C. A Parratt. K.J Chapman. C. Turner. P.H Jones. M.T Mendl. B.G Miller. The fighting behaviour of piglets mixed before and after weaning in the presence or absence of a sow. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101. (2006). [Google Scholar]
M.G.H Deen. G. Bilkei. Cross fostering of low- birthweight piglets. Lives. Prod. Sci. 90. (2004). [Google Scholar]
T.S Bruun. C. Amdi. J. Vinther J. M. Schop. A.B Strathe. C.F Hansen. Reproductive performance of “nurse sows” in Danish piggeries. Theriogenology. 86. (2016). [Google Scholar]
M. V Curtasu. P.K Theil. M.S Hedemann. Metabolomic profiles of colostrum and milk from lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 94. (2016). [Google Scholar]
F. Klobasa. E. Werhahn. J.E Butler. Composition of sow milk during lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 64. (1987) https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.6451458x [Google Scholar]
W. L Hurley. Composition of sow colustrum and milk. In C. Farmer (Ed.). The gestating and lactating sow. Wageningen Academic Publishers. (2015). https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2-8 [Google Scholar]
K.D Vande Pol. R.O Bautista. H. Harper. C. M Shull. C.B Brown. M. Ellis. Effect of within-litter birth weight variation after cross-fostering on piglet preweaning growth and mortality. Translat. Anim. Sci. 5.(2021b) https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab039 [Google Scholar]
F. Thorup. M. B. F Nielsen.The growth decreases when small piglets stay with their own mother at litter equalization. Danish: Tilvxksten falder nar de sma pattegrise bliverhos egen mor ved kuldudjxvning. SEGES Svineproduktion. (2017) [Google Scholar]
I. Horrell, J. Hodgson, The bases of sow-piglet identification. 1. The identification by sows of their own piglets and the presence of intruders. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci. 33, (1992). [Google Scholar]
Aro, S. O Aro, O. Olowofeso, J.O Agbede, The influence of mutual maternal and neonatal recognition on the foster mothering techniques in pigs. Nigerian J. Anim.Prod. 35, (2008) [Google Scholar]
H. L. Ko, Q. Chong, D. Escribano, I. Camerlink, X. Manteca, P. Llonch, Pre-weaning socialization and environmental enrichment affect life-long response to regrouping in commercially-reared pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 229, (2020). [Google Scholar]
T. Morgan, J. Pluske, D. Miller, T. Collins, A.L Barnes, F. Wemelsfelder, P. A Fleming, (2014). Socialising piglets in lactation positively affects their post-weaning behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 158, (2014) [Google Scholar]
J. E Weller, I. Camerlink, S.P Turner, M. Farish, G. Arnott, Socialisation and its effect on play behaviour and aggression in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa). Scientific Reports. 9, (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.