Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 195, 2025
2025 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics (ICBEB 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Biomedical Imaging, Modeling and Visualization Technologies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202519502003 | |
| Published online | 14 November 2025 | |
- C. Gabriel, S. Gabriel, E. Corthout, The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey, Phys. Med. Biol., 41(11) (1996). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/001 [Google Scholar]
- S. Mansouri, Y. Alharbi, F. Haddad, S. Chabcoub, A. Alshrouf, A. A. Abd-Elghany, Electrical impedance tomography – recent applications and developments, J. Electr. Bioimpedance, 12(1), 50–62 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2021-0007 [Google Scholar]
- B. H. Brown, A. D. Seagar, The Sheffield data collection system, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 8(4A), 91–97 (1987). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/012 [Google Scholar]
- Z. Zhao, F. Fu, I. Frerichs, Thoracic electrical impedance tomography in Chinese hospitals: A review of clinical research and daily applications, Physiol. Meas., 41(4) (2020). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6579/ab81df/meta [Google Scholar]
- T. K. Bera, Applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT): A Short Review, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 331(1) (2018). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/331/1/012004 [Google Scholar]
- P. Grasland-Mongrain, C. Lafon, Review on biomedical techniques for imaging electrical impedance, IRBM, 39(4), 243–250 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2018.06.001 [Google Scholar]
- M. Faulkner, S. Hannan, K. Aristovich, J. Avery, D. Holder, Feasibility of imaging evoked activity throughout the rat brain using electrical impedance tomography, NeuroImage, 178, 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.022 [Google Scholar]
- Grieve, B. D., Dyakowski, T., Mann, R., & Wang, M. (1999, April). Interfacing of EIT into an industrial pressure filter, A practical example. In Proceedings of 1st World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography (pp. 14–17). [Google Scholar]
- Ionita, C. N., Mokin, M., Varble, N., Bednarek, D. R., Xiang, J., Snyder, K. V., Siddiqui, A. H., Levy, E. I., Meng, H., & Rudin, S. (2014). Challenges and limitations of patient-specific vascular phantom fabrication using 3D Polyjet printing. Proceedings of SPIE, 9038, 90380M. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2042266 [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, C., & Kulkarni, J. (2017). A review of the management of phantom limb pain: challenges and solutions. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 1861–1870. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S124664 [Google Scholar]
- Clemente, F., Amato, F., Adamo, S., Russo, M., Angelone, F., Ponsiglione, A. M., & Romano, M. (2024). Circuital modelling in muscle tissue impedance measurements. Heliyon, 10(7), e28723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28723 [Google Scholar]
- Hrabuska, R., Prauzek, M., Venclikova, M., & Konecny, J. (2018). Image reconstruction for electrical impedance tomography: Experimental comparison of radial basis neural network and Gauss – newton method. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(6), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.07.114 [Google Scholar]
- Menin, O. H. (2009). Método dos elementos de contorno para tomografia de impedância elétrica. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.59.2009.TDE-31102009-085546 [Google Scholar]
- Halter, R. J., Hartov, A., Poplack, S. P., diFlorio-Alexander, R., Wells, W. A., Rosenkranz, K. M., Barth, R. J., Kaufman, P. A., & Paulsen, K. D. (2015). Real-time electrical impedance variations in women with and without breast cancer. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 34(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2342719 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.