Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 196, 2025
The 3rd International Conference and Scientific Meeting of the Indonesian Limnology Society (SMILS III)
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 12
Section GIS, Remote Sensing, and Database-Driven Modeling and Decision Support for Sustainable Inland Water Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202519606001
Published online 21 November 2025
  • K.E. Schilling, M.K. Jha, Y.K. Zhang, P.W. Gassman, C.F. Wolter, Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions. Water Resour. Res. 44, 074 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006644 [Google Scholar]
  • I. Ridwansyah, A. Sapei, M. Raimadona, Applying SWAT to predict impact of land use change on hydrological response in the Upper Cimanuk Catchment Area. Proc. 5th Int. Remote Sensing and GIS Workshop on Demography, Land Use-Land Cover and Disaster (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • I. Ridwansyah, M. Yulianti, H. Wibowo, Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrology modelling as a basis for spatial planning: a case study in Cimandiri Watershed, West Java Province. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 380, 012017 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • I. Ridwansyah, M. Yulianti, Apip, S. Onodera, Y. Shimizu, H. Wibowo, Fakhrudin, Impact of land use and climate change on surface runoff and groundwater in Cimanuk Catchment Area using the SWAT model. Limnology (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-020-00629-9 [Google Scholar]
  • S.L. Neitsch, J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, J.R. Williams, Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 (Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  • J.E. Nash, J.V. Sutcliffe, River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I— A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10(3), 282-290 (1970). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.N. Moriasi, J.G. Arnold, M.W. Van Liew, R.L. Bingner, R.D. Harmel, T.L. Veith, Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 50(3), 885-900 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • J.R. Landis, G.G. Koch, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159-174 (1977). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Pang, H. Zhang, Q. Xu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, O. Zhang, J. Hao, Hydrological evaluation of open-access precipitation data using SWAT at multiple temporal and spatial scales. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 3603-3626 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3603-2020 [Google Scholar]
  • I.R. Sushanti, N.H. Imansyah, F. Susanti, Y.I. Mahendra, R. Ridha, Kajian perubahan fisik spasial kawasan urban fringe di Kecamatan Ampenan Kota Mataram. J. Planoearth 3, 44-48 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31764/jpe.v3i2.609 [Google Scholar]
  • S.M. Yusuf, K. Murtilaksono, M. Harjianto, E. Herlina, The utilization of satellite imagery data to predict hydrology characteristics in Dodokan Watershed. Procedia Environ. Sci. 33, 36-43 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Saleh, J.G. Arnold, P.W. Gassman, L.M. Hauck, W.D. Rosenthal, J.R. Williams, A.M.S. McFarland, Application of SWAT for the Upper North Bosque River Watershed. Trans. ASAE 43(5), 1077-1087 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • A.C. Guzha, M.C. Rufino, S. Okoth, S. Jacobs, R.L.B. Nöbrega, Impacts of land use and land cover change on surface runoff, discharge and low flows: Evidence from East Africa. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 15, 49-67 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • P. Nugroho, D. Marsono, P. Sudira, H. Suryatmojo, Impact of land-use changes on water balance. Procedia Environ. Sci. 17, 256-262 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • T.J. Baker, S.N. Miller, Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed. J. Hydrol. 486, 100-111 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.041 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.