Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 204, 2025
International Conference on Advancing Science and Technologies in Health Science (IEM-HEALS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01018 | |
| Number of page(s) | 16 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202520401018 | |
| Published online | 12 December 2025 | |
- A. Jiménez-Sánchez et al., “Precise proximal femur fracture classification for interactive training and surgical planning,” Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 847–857, May 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02150-x. [Google Scholar]
- G. Marullo et al., “Classification of AO/OTA 31A/B femur fractures in X-ray images using YOLOv8 and advanced data augmentation techniques,” Bone Rep, vol. 22, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101801. [Google Scholar]
- L. Tanzi, E. Vezzetti, R. Moreno, A. Aprato, A. Audisio, and A. Massè, “Hierarchical fracture classification of proximal femur X-Ray images using a multistage Deep Learning approach,” Eur J Radiol, vol. 133, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109373. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Qi et al., “Ground truth annotated femoral X-ray image dataset and object detection based method for fracture types classification,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 189436–189444, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029039. [Google Scholar]
- L. Tanzi, A. Audisio, G. Cirrincione, A. Aprato, and E. Vezzetti, “Vision Transformer for femur fracture classification,” Injury, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 2625–2634, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.04.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Rajpurkar et al., “MURA: Large Dataset for Abnormality Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiographs,” May 2018, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06957 [Google Scholar]
- J. Bae et al., “External Validation of Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Visualizing Femoral Neck Fracture Including Displaced and Non-displaced Fracture on Plain X-ray,” J Digit Imaging, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1099–1109, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00499-2. [Google Scholar]
- S. J. Yoon, T. H. Kim, S. Bin Joo, and S. E. Oh, “Automatic multi-class intertrochanteric femur fracture detection from ct images based on ao/ota classification using faster r-cnn-bo method,” J Appl Biomed, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 97–105, 2020, doi: 10.32725/jab.2020.013. [Google Scholar]
- S. Mutasa, S. Varada, A. Goel, T. T. Wong, and M. J. Rasiej, “Advanced Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Automated Femoral Neck Fracture Detection and Classification,” J Digit Imaging, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1209–1217, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00364-8. [Google Scholar]
- A. Alzaid, A. Wignall, S. Dogramadzi, H. Pandit, and S. Q. Xie, “Automatic detection and classification of peri-prosthetic femur fracture,” Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 649–660, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02552-5. [Google Scholar]
- A. Jiménez-Sánchez et al., “Curriculum learning for improved femur fracture classification: Scheduling data with prior knowledge and uncertainty,” Med Image Anal, vol. 75, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102273. [Google Scholar]
- W. Gale, L. Oakden-Rayner, G. Carneiro, A. P. Bradley, and L. J. Palmer, “Detecting hip fractures with radiologist-level performance using deep neural networks,” Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, no. 06504, Nov. 2017, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06504 [Google Scholar]
- J. Bae et al., “External Validation of Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Visualizing Femoral Neck Fracture Including Displaced and Non-displaced Fracture on Plain X-ray,” J Digit Imaging, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1099–1109, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00499-2. [Google Scholar]
- A. Berrajaa, M. Merras, and I. Berrajaa, “Advanced CNN based on genetic algorithm to automated femoral neck fracture classification,” Signal Image Video Process, vol. 18, no. 6–7, pp. 5229–5238, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11760-024-03228-8. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.