Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 215, 2026
The International Congress on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development (RENA 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02014 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Biotechnology and Valorization of Natural Resources | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202621502014 | |
| Published online | 04 February 2026 | |
- M. Khamvongsa, K. Milton, T. Faisal, Mechanical characterization of low-cost 3D FDM printed scaffolds fabricated with synthesized PLA/HA bio-composite filament. Ann. 3D Print. Med. 18, 100194 (2025) [Google Scholar]
- Alonso-Fernández I, Haugen HJ, Lopez-Péña M, Gonzalez-Cantalapiedrá A, Muñoz F. Use of 3D-printed polylactic acid/bioceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in preclinical in vivo studies: a systematic review. Acta Biomater 2023;168:1–21. [Google Scholar]
- E.B. Hunziker, K. Lippuner, M.J.B. Keel, N. Shintani, An educationalreview of cartilage repair: precepts & practice-myths & misconceptions-progress & prospects, Osteoarthr. Cartil. 23 (2015) 334–350. [Google Scholar]
- M. Alonzo, F.A. Primo, S.A. Kumar, J.A. Mudloff, E. Dominguez, G. Fregoso, N. Ortiz, W.M. Weiss, B. Joddar, Bone tissueengineering techniques, advances, and scaffolds for treatment of bone defects, Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 17 (2021), 100248. [Google Scholar]
- Cao S, et al. New perspectives: in-situ tissue engineering for bone repair scaffold. Compos B Eng 2020;202:108445. [Google Scholar]
- Holzapfel BM, et al. How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013;65(4):581–603. [Google Scholar]
- Lee N. The Lancet Technology: 3D printing for instruments, models, and organs? Lancet 2016;388:1368.10052. [Google Scholar]
- Askari M, et al. Recent progress in extrusion 3D bioprinting of hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration: a comprehensive review with focus on advanced fabrication techniques. Biomater Sci 2021;9(3):535–73 [Google Scholar]
- Mao D, et al. Fabrication of 3D porous poly(lactic acid)-based composite scaffolds with tunable biodegradation for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des 2018;142: 1–10 [Google Scholar]
- Wang X, et al. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng 2017;110:442–58. [Google Scholar]
- Garot C, Bettega G, Picart C. Additive manufacturing of material scaffolds for bone regeneration: toward application in the clinics. Adv Funct Mater 2020;31(5): 2006967. [Google Scholar]
- Mazzanti V, Malagutti L, Mollica F. FDM 3D printing of polymers containing natural fillers: a review of their mechanical properties. Polymers 2019;11(7). [Google Scholar]
- Ngo TD, et al. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos B Eng 2018;143:172–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Miclaus, A. Repanovici, and N. Roman, “Biomaterials: Polylactic acidand 3D printing processes for orthosis and prosthetic”, Materiale Plastice, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 98–102, 2018. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.17.1.4794 [Google Scholar]
- N. Mathiazhagan, S. Palaniyappan, and N. K. Sivakumar NK, “Effect of fused filament fabrication parameters on crashworthiness studies of hydroxyapatite particle reinforced PLA composite thin-walled tubes,” Journal of the Mechanical Behaviour of Biomedical Materials, vol. 138, pp. 1–18, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105611 [Google Scholar]
- S. Mondal, T. P. Nguyen, V. H. Pham, and G. Hoang, “Hydroxyapatite nano bioceramicsoptimized 3D printing poly lactic acid scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications”, Ceramics International, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 3443–3455, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.057 [Google Scholar]
- R. K. Gond, Tejas Pramod Naik, Manoj Kumar Gupta & Inderdeep Singh (2022) Development and characterisation of sugarcane bagasse nanocellulose/ PLA composites, Materials Technology, 37:14, 2942–2954, (2022) DOI: 10.1080/10667857.2022.2088616 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.