Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 215, 2026
The International Congress on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development (RENA 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Climate Change and Natural Resource Management | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202621503002 | |
| Published online | 04 February 2026 | |
- N. Mansour, Green technology innovation and financial services system: Evidence from China. Businesses 3(1), 98–113 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses3010008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Ikram, J. E. Sadki, Resilient and sustainable green technology strategies: A study of Morocco's path toward sustainable development. Sustain. Futures 8, 100327 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100327 [Google Scholar]
- S.A.R. Khan, Z. Yu, H. Golpira, A. Sharif, A. Mardani, A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis on sustainable supply chain management: Future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357 [Google Scholar]
- L. Zhang, R. Mu, S. Hu, J. Yu, J. Zhang, Industrial coagglomeration, technological innovation, and environmental pollution in China: Life-cycle perspective of coagglomeration. J. Clean. Prod., 362, 132280 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132280 [Google Scholar]
- Y.-X. Lu, S.-T. Wang, G.-X. Yao, J. Xu, Green total factor efficiency in vegetable production: A comprehensive ecological analysis of China’s practices. Agriculture 13(10), 2021 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13102021 [Google Scholar]
- P. M. Bican, A. Brem, Digital business model, digital transformation, digital entrepreneurship: Is there a sustainable “digital”? Sustainability 12(13), 5239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135239 [Google Scholar]
- A. A. Vărzaru, C. G. Bocean, Digital transformation and innovation: The influence of digital technologies on turnover from innovation activities and types of innovation, Systems, 12(9), 359, (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090359 [Google Scholar]
- S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, N.C. Dhone, Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(5), 1319–1337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630772 [Google Scholar]
- A. Billi & A. Bernardo, The Effects of Digital Transformation, IT Innovation, and Sustainability Strategies on Firms’ Performances: An Empirical Study, Sustainability, 17(3), 823, (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030823 [Google Scholar]
- Y. Zhang, T. Swatdikun, P. Lakkanawanit, S.-Z. Huang & H. Chen, Digital Transformation Capability, Organizational Strategic Intuition, and Digital Leadership: Empirical Evidence from High-Tech Firms’ Performance in the Yangtze River Delta, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(7), 405, (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18070405 [Google Scholar]
- N.M.D. Gandhi, V. Selladurai, P. Santhi, Unsustainable development to sustainable development: a conceptual model. Manag. Environ. Qual. 17(6), 654–672 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830610702502 [Google Scholar]
- M. Christen, S. Schmidt, A formal framework for conceptions of sustainability - a theoretical contribution to the discourse in sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 20(6), 400–410 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.518 [Google Scholar]
- J. Harmon, F. Bucy, S. Nickbarg, G. Rao, J. Wirtenberg, Developing a sustainability strategy. In The sustainable enterprise fieldbook, 89–116 (Routledge, 2017) [Google Scholar]
- J. Mensah, Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Soc. Sci., 5, 1653531 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531 [Google Scholar]
- A. Boar, R. Bastida, F. Marimon, A systematic literature review. Relationships between the sharing economy, sustainability and sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 12, 6744 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176744 [Google Scholar]
- A. Shakoor, R. Ahmed, Exploring the influence of three dimensions of sustainable development goals on economic growth: An evidence from selected SAARC countries. J. Econ. Dev. 49(3), 149 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- R. Murphy, Sustainability: A wicked problem. Sociologica 6(2) (2012). https://doi.org/10.2383/38274 [Google Scholar]
- B. Littig, E. Griessler, Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 8(1-2), 65–79 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375 [Google Scholar]
- J. Kaur, K. Kaur, R. Singh, Adopting technology for sustainable development: Reflections on innovative ecosystem. In Fostering sustainable development in the age of technologies, 93–111 (Emerald Publishing Limited, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-060-120231009 [Google Scholar]
- H. Fazlurrahman, U. Ciptomulyono, Volatility technology and environmental sustainability to improve green innovation in small medium enterprises: A bibliometric analysis. In Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Cyber IT Serv. Manag. (CITSM), 1–5 (IEEE, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM64103.2024.10775960 [Google Scholar]
- J. Klewitz, E.G. Hansen, Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 57–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017 [Google Scholar]
- S.C. Chong, N. Kaliappen, Antecedents and consequences for sustainability in Malaysian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Soc. Responsib. J. 21(5), 987–1008 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2024-0009 [Google Scholar]
- S. Balasubramanian, V. Shukla, J. Chanchaichujit, Firm size implications for environmental sustainability of supply chains: evidence from the UAE. Manag. Environ. Qual.: Int. J. 31(5), 1375–1406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2020-0004 [Google Scholar]
- I. Karra, H. Affes, Les pressions des parties prenantes, l’intention stratégique verte et le renforcement de la compétitivité des entreprises industrielles tunisiennes. Rev. Gestion Organ. 8(2), 96–106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgo.2016.09.003 [Google Scholar]
- M. Sanni, Y. J. Kim, How open are African inventors? Open green technologies and patenting activities in Africa. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. 16(4), 523–536 (2024). https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-aa_ajstid_v16_n4_a523 [Google Scholar]
- M. Jayalakshmi, M. Mahalingam, Green Technology: A Contribution to Sustainable Development in India. Int. Res. J. Adv. Sci. Hub 2, 60–63 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- M. Saunila, J. Ukko, T. Rantala, Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. J. Clean. Prod. 179, 631–641 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.211 [Google Scholar]
- A. Javed, J. A. Fuinhas, A. Rapposelli, Asymmetric nexus between green technology innovations, economic policy uncertainty, and environmental sustainability: evidence from Italy. Energies 16(8), 3557 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083557 [Google Scholar]
- G. Rakhimzhanova, A. Maidyrova, A. Kocherbaeva, Human capital management based on the principles of green economy and the creation of green jobs for sustainable territorial development. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 14(5), 2319–2327 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.5(69).13 [Google Scholar]
- P. Arroyo, Technology innovation activity and environmental sustainability, in Technology and Innovation in Latin America, Emerald Publishing Limited, 109–132 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-747-520251007 [Google Scholar]
- J. Vrchota, M. Pech, L. Rolinek, J. Bednář, Sustainability outcomes of green processes in relation to Industry 4.0 in manufacturing: Systematic review, Sustainability, 12, 5968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155968 [Google Scholar]
- B. B. Tyler, B. Lahneman, D. Cerrato, A. Discua Cruz, K. Beukel, N. Spielmann, Environmental practice adoption in SMEs: The effects of firm proactive orientation and regulatory pressure, J. Small Bus. Manag. 62, 2211–2246 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2218435 [Google Scholar]
- H. Tian, A. Wang, Sustainable leadership, knowledge sharing, and frugal innovation: The moderating role of organizational innovation climate, Sage Open 13, 21582440231200946 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231200946 [Google Scholar]
- X. Zhao, S. Li, Artificial intelligence and public environmental concern: Impacts on green innovation transformation in energy-intensive enterprises, Energy Policy, 198, 114469 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114469 [Google Scholar]
- M. Jaboob, A. M. Al-Ansi, M. Al-Okaily, M. Ferasso, Harnessing artificial intelligence for strategic decision-making: the catalyst impact of digital leadership, Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-12-2024-0706 [Google Scholar]
- M. T. Fülöp, D. I. Topor, The digital transformation of SMEs: opportunities and challenges for sustainability reporting in Romania, J. Glob. Respons. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-10-2024-0211 [Google Scholar]
- V. Vasilev, D. Stefanova, C. Popescu, Human capital management and digitalization-From good practices and traditions to sustainable development, in Digitalization, Sustainable Development, and Industry 5.0, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2023, pp. 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-190-520231004 [Google Scholar]
- N. A. Albannai, M. M. Raziq, M. Malik, J. Scott-Kennel, J. Igoe, Unraveling the role of digital leadership in developing digital dynamic capabilities for the digital transformation of firms, Benchmarking: An Int. J., 32, 2250–2275 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2023-0756 [Google Scholar]
- K. M. Eisenhardt, Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manag. Rev., 14, 532–550 (1989). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2018). [Google Scholar]
- V. Braun, V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. P. Sharma, C. Kanta, Green technology in relation to sustainable agriculture: A methodological approach. In Renewable Energy and Green Technology, 29–39 (CRC Press, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- R. Gholami, A. B. Sulaiman, T. Ramayah, A. Molla, Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Inf. Manag. 50, 431–438 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.01.004 [Google Scholar]
- Y. Yu, M. Zhang, B. Huo, The impact of relational capital on green supply chain management and financial performance. Prod. Plann. Control 32, 861–874 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1774675 [Google Scholar]
- H. Pittri, Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Technologies for Circular Economy Implementation: Evidence from Developing Countries, Buildings, 15(7), 1090, (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071090 [Google Scholar]
- B. Hinings, T. Gegenhuber, R. Greenwood, Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Inf. Organ. 28, 52–61 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004 [Google Scholar]
- T. Clohessy, T. Acton, Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption: An innovation theory perspective. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 119, 1457–1491 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0365 [Google Scholar]
- S. Bresciani, K.-H. Huarng, A. Malhotra, A. Ferraris, Digital transformation as a springboard for product, process and business model innovation. J. Bus. Res. 128, 204–210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.003 [Google Scholar]
- J. Elkington, Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 8(1), 37–51 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

