Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2026
2026 16th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics (ICBBB 2026)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Bioinformatics Algorithms and Advanced Omics Data Analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623201001
Published online 24 April 2026
  • Q. Gao et al., "Opportunities and challenges for co-delivery nanomedicines based on combination of phytochemicals with chemotherapeutic drugs in cancer treatment," Advanced drug delivery reviews, vol. 188, p. 114445, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • R. L. Siegel, T. B. Kratzer, A. N. Giaquinto, H. Sung, and A. Jemal, "Cancer statistics, 2025," Ca, vol. 75, no. 1, p. 10, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • R. L. Siegel, A. N. Giaquinto, and A. Jemal, "Cancer statistics, 2024," CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 12–49, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Zhang, C. Xu, X. Gao, and Q. Yao, "Platinum-based drugs for cancer therapy and anti-tumor strategies," Theranostics, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 2115, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Xia et al., "A cross-study analysis of drug response prediction in cancer cell lines," Briefings in bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 1, p. bbab356, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Das, K. Bhattarai, S. Rajaganapathy, L. Wang, J. R. Cerhan, and N. Zong, "Leveraging multi-source to resolve inconsistency across pharmacogenomic datasets in drug sensitivity prediction," medRxiv, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Ha, J. Park, and K. Jo, "Comparative analysis of regression algorithms for drug response prediction using GDSC dataset," BMC Research Notes, vol. 18, no. Suppl 1, p. 10, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • G. o. D. S. i. Cancer. "Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer." https://www.cancerrxgene.org/news (accessed June 14, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Park, Y. Lee, and S. Nam, "A performance evaluation of drug response prediction models for individual drugs," Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 11911, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Park et al., "A comprehensive evaluation of regression-based drug responsiveness prediction models, using cell viability inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values)," Bioinformatics, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2810–2817, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Arafeh, T. Shibue, J. M. Dempster, W. C. Hahn, and F. Vazquez, "The present and future of the Cancer Dependency Map," Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Du, H. Huai, X. Wu, H. Wang, W. Liu, and X. Tang, "Using XGBoost-SHAP for understanding the ecosystem services trade-off effects and driving mechanisms in ecologically fragile areas," Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 16, p. 1552818, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • M. H. Cohen et al., "Approval summary: nelarabine for the treatment of T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma," Clinical cancer research, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 5329–5335, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • !!! INVALID CITATION !!! [Google Scholar]
  • S. Stilgenbauer et al., "Venetoclax for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion: results from the full population of a phase II pivotal trial," Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 36, no. 19, pp. 1973–1980, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.