Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 234, 2026
The Frontier in Sustainable Agromaritime and Environmental Development Conference (FiSAED 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04015 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Socio-economic Transformation for Sustainable Agromaritime | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623404015 | |
| Published online | 23 April 2026 | |
- L. R. Wibowo et al.., Accelerating certification of oil palm smallholders through institutionalization of various incentives. For. Soc. 7, 263 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- L. Liana, H. Siregar, B. M. Sinaga, D. B. Hakim, Technical efficiency and technology gap of smallholder oil palm farmer: ISPO and Non-ISPO in Riau, Indonesia, using a stochastic meta-frontier approach. Journal of ISSAAS 31, (2025). [Google Scholar]
- N. K. Hidayat, A. Offermans, P. Glasbergen. Sustainable palm oil as a public responsibility? On the governance capacity of Indonesian Standard for Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO). Agric. Hum. Values 35, 223 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- R. R. Novanda, M. F. Barchia, L. R. E. Malau, N. A. Ulya, R. Anjani, Environmental challenges in peatlands: insights into smallholder oil palm farmers’ attitudes in Muko- Muko, Indonesia, YYU J AGR SCI 1841871 (2026). [Google Scholar]
- C. Brandi, T. Cabani, C. Hosang, S. Schirmbeck, L. Westermann, H. Wiese, Sustainability standards for palm oil: challenges for smallholder certification under the RSPO. J. Environ. Dev. 24, 292 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- H. Maat, L. W. Lisnawati, M. Slingerland, Good agricultural practices in oil palm and smallholder inclusion in Indonesia, in exploring inclusive palm oil production (European Tropical Forest Research Network, 2019), pp. 72-77. [Google Scholar]
- Ernah, P. Parvathi, H. Waibel, Will teaching sustainability standards to oil palm smallholders in Indonesia pay off?. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 18, 196 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- M. A. B. S. Splinter, L. K. E. Dries, A conceptual framework for measuring transaction costs in agri-environmental schemes: an application to the Dutch collective scheme. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 67, 3217 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- C. O. Trejo-Prech, R. Servin-Juàrez, A. Reyes-Duarte, What sets cooperative farmers apart from non-cooperative farmers? A transaction cost economics analysis of coffee farmers in Mexico. Agric. Food Econ. 11, (2023). [Google Scholar]
- B. Baraka, J. Mburu, B. Muriithi, Transaction costs magnitudes, market participation, and smallholder profitability in rural-urban vegetable supply chain. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 1 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- S. E. Wright, R. B. Noble, A. J. Bailer, Equal-precision allocations and other constraints in stratified random sampling. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 77, 1081 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- W. Lijia, H. Xuexi, Grower’s selling behavior: transaction cost comparison analysis, Agric. Econ. Rev. 15, (2014). [Google Scholar]
- B. Tefera, H. Kassa, T. Zelalem, Analysis of ethiopian coffee value chain for compliance with european union deforestation regulation. Trees For. People. 22, 100978 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- N. I. Denashurya, Nurliza, E. Dolorosa, D. Kurniati, D. Suswati, Overcoming barriers to ISPO certification: analyzing the drivers of sustainable agricultural adoption among farmers. Sustainability 15, 16507 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- C. Moreno-Miranda, L. Dries, The role of coordination mechanisms and transaction costs promoting sustainability performance in agri-food supply chains: evidence from Ecuador. Agribusiness (2024). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.