Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 237, 2026
2026 8th International Conference on Biotechnology and Biomedicine (ICBB 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03022 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Biomaterials, Medical Devices and Biomedical Engineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623703022 | |
| Published online | 10 June 2026 | |
- N.C. Seeman, H.F. Sleiman. DNA nanotechnology. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 1 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- T.J. Fu, N.C. Seeman. DNA double-crossover molecules. Biochem. 32, 13 (1993) [Google Scholar]
- P.W.K. Rothemund. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nat. 440, 7082 (2006) [Google Scholar]
- S.M. Douglas, A.H. Marblestone, S. Teerapittayanon, A. Vazquez, G.M. Church, W.M. Shih. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 15 (2009) [Google Scholar]
- K. Tapio, I. Bald. The potential of DNA origami to build multifunctional materials. Multifunct. Mater. 3, 3 (2020) [Google Scholar]
- H. Pei, X. Zuo, D. Zhu, Q. Huang, C. Fan. Functional DNA nanostructures for theranostic applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 2 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- J.A. Kulkarni, D. Witzigmann, S.B. Thomson, S. Chen, B.R. Leavitt, P.R. Cullis, R. van der Meel. The current landscape of nucleic acid therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 6 (2021) [Google Scholar]
- S. Ramakrishnan, G. Krainer, G. Grundmeier, M. Schlierf, A. Keller. Structural stability of DNA origami nanostructures in the presence of chaotropic agents. Nanoscale. 8, (2021) [Google Scholar]
- A.R. Chandrasekaran. Nuclease resistance of DNA nanostructures. Nat Rev Chem. 5, 4 (2021) [Google Scholar]
- M. Madsen, K.V. Gothelf. Chemistries for DNA nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 119, 10 (2019) [Google Scholar]
- Z. Shen, H. Yan, T. Wang, N.C. Seeman. Paranemic crossover DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 6 (2004) [Google Scholar]
- T.H. LaBean, H. Yan, J. Kopatsch, F. Liu, E. Winfree, J.H. Reif, N.C. Seeman. Construction, analysis, ligation, and self-assembly of DNA triple crossover complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 9 (2000) [Google Scholar]
- E. Winfree, F. Liu, L.A. Wenzler, N.C. Seeman. Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals. Nat. 394, 6693 (1998) [Google Scholar]
- Y. He, Y. Tian, Y. Chen, Z. Deng, A.E. Ribbe, C. Mao. Sequence symmetry as a tool for designing DNA nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 44, 41 (2005) [Google Scholar]
- F. Mathieu, S. Liao, J. Kopatsch, T. Wang, C. Mao, N.C. Seeman. Six-helix bundles designed from DNA. Nano Lett. 5, 4 (2005) [Google Scholar]
- S. Ramakrishnan, L. Schärfen, K. Hunold, S. Fricke, G. Grundmeier, M. Schlierf, A. Keller, G. Krainer. Enhancing the stability of DNA origami nanostructures: staple strand redesign versus enzymatic ligation. Nanoscale. 11, 47 (2019) [Google Scholar]
- Q. Mei, X. Wei, F. Su, Y. Liu, C. Youngbull, R. Johnson, S. Lindsay, H. Yan, D. Meldrum. Stability of DNA origami nanoarrays in cell lysate. Nano Lett. 11, 4 (2011) [Google Scholar]
- K.V. Gothelf. Chemical modifications and reactions in DNA nanostructures. MRS Bull. 42, 12 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- N. Stephanopoulos. Strategies for Stabilizing DNA Nanostructures to Biological Conditions. Chembiochem. 20, 17 (2019) [Google Scholar]
- D.S. Novopashina, O.S. Totskaya, S.A. Kholodar’, M.I. Meshchaninova, A. G. Ven’yaminova. Oligo(2′-O-methylribonucleotides) and their derivatives. Bioorg Khim. 34, 5 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- Y. Dantsu, W. Zhang. Derivatization of mirror-image L-nucleic acids with 2′-OMe modification for thermal and structural stabilization. ChemBioChem. 24, 12 (2023) [Google Scholar]
- S. Kalra, A. Donnelly, N. Singh, D. Matthews, R. Del Villar-Guerra, V. Bemmer, C. Dominguez, N. Allcock, D. Cherny, A. Revyakin, D.A. Rusling. Functionalizing DNA origami by triplex-directed site-specific photo-cross-linking. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 19 (2024) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.