Issue |
BIO Web of Conferences
Volume 7, 2016
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02012 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Oenology | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20160702012 | |
Published online | 26 October 2016 |
Comparative analysis of volatile and phenolic composition of alternative wood chips from cherry, acacia and oak for potential use in enology
1 Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (CI&DETS), Escola Superior Agrária, Ranhados, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal
2 Universidade de Burgos, Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biotecnologia e Ciência dos Alimentos, Plaza Misael Bañuelos s/n, 09001 Burgos, Espanha
a e-mail: antoniojordao@esav.ipv.pt
The aim of present work was to investigate the phenolic and volatile composition of cherry, acacia, and oak (from different species) wood chips. By the use of HPLC-DAD 18 different phenolic compounds were detected and quantified while for volatile composition, 33 different compounds were detected by GC-MS. In general, wood samples from oak species showed the higher number of phenolic compounds detected, while cherry wood samples showed the lowest levels. In addition, some individual phenolic compounds were detected, specifically in some wood samples, such as robinetin in acacia woods and naringenin in cherry wood. For volatile composition, cherry wood chips samples showed the lowest volatile composition followed by increasing order by acacia, French, Portuguese and American wood chip samples. Oak wood chip samples from American species showed the highest volatile content, as a result of high levels of several specific compounds (furfural, 5-methyfurfural, β-methyl-γ-octalactones, guaiacol, vanillin and siringaldehyde).
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences 2016
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.