BIO Web Conf.
Volume 14, 2019The 12th International Conference on the Health Effects of Incorporated Radionuclides (HEIR 2018)
|Number of page(s)||3|
|Section||Dosimetry and Dose Assessment: Oral presentations|
|Published online||07 May 2019|
Multi-cellular dosimetry of β+-emitting radionuclides used for cell labeling in the context of cell tracking studies with PET imaging
IRSN/PSE, SANTE/SDOS/LEDI, Fontenay-aux-Roses
2 CEA DRF, I2BM/SHFJ/U1023 Service, Hospitalier Frederic Joliot, Orsay
3 IRSN/PSE, SANTE/SDOS, Fontenay-aux-Roses
4 IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SESANE/LRTOX, Fontenay-aux-Roses
Radiolabeling of cells combined with nuclear medicine imaging provides a potential method for cell trafficking analysis in vivo. Besides, the use of β+-emitting radionuclides is of particular interest given the good intrinsic characteristics offered by PET technology. Generally, a direct labeling approach is applied in which cells are mixed with a radioactive solution and incubated in vitro at 37°C to permit the incorporation of the radionuclide intracellularly. Because the procedure implies the use of high amount of radioactivity, various studies have taken interest about the effects of labeling on cell viability and functionality. Though severe cell cytotoxicity was pointed out, e.g. reduction of proliferation capacity when labeling with 18F-FDG [1, 2], not clear conclusions has been drawn from these findings. Particularly, comparison and analysis of results are limited because the observed biological effects are often evaluated as a function of added activity rather than absorbed dose delivered to the cell [3, 4, 5]. Accurate dosimetry is required to allow for the establishment of a reliable absorbed dose-effect relationship and therefore to get a comprehensive assessment of the toxicity induced by the labeling procedure. This work aimed to develop a realistic multi-cellular dosimetry and apply the model to the analysis of 3 radionuclides used for labeling in PET: 18F, 64Cu and 68Ga.
A program using Python was developed to generate cell coordinates from a set of initial parameters i.e. cell size, cell density, bounding volume size. A cubic cell arrangement was assumed and the calculation approach was based on an analytical formula using pre-determined S factors (absorbed dose per unit time-integrated activity). These S values were calculated by MCNP6 modelling considering radioactivity uniformly distributed in a source cell placed at variable distances from another cell with the nucleus as the target. The mean absorbed dose to the cell nucleus was determined as a function of the cell density and the intra-to-extra cellular activity distribution considering both the contribution of radioactivity located within the cells (self- and cross-dose) and in the culture medium. To verify the contribution of cellular dosimetry in this study, the results were compared with those obtained using conventional dosimetry which is based on the assumption that the radionuclide is distributed homogenously in the global volume. Dose calculations were also done under realistic conditions of labeling of leukocytes with 18F-FDG on the basis of labeling parameters used in few reported studies.
For all radionuclides, the cellular-to-conventional dose ratios can vary significantly with cell density, reaching important values at low density and approaching 1 at high density. They were also influenced by the activity distribution between the cells and the medium, the highest values occurring when all activity was incorporated in the cells. Such trends were in agreement with previous work [6, 7]. A significant underestimation of mean dose to the cell by conventional model was particularly observed for 64Cu up to 15-fold at low density when source is located in the nucleus. This observation is due to the emission of short-range auger electrons, responsible for a major self-dose, that deposit all their energy in the cell nucleus. 68Ga and 18F presented lower discrepancies between cellular and conventional doses considering the emission of larger-range β+ that enables to counteract a certain degree of heterogeneity in the source distribution by a more homogenous dose deposit. Finally, the comparison between published data highlighted the high disparity of parameters used for labeling of leukocytes with 18F-FDG. Calculation results showed significant deviations of the actual cell dose from the conventional one up to a factor of 5. We also observed that a same injected activity per cell can result in important different absorbed doses.
The development of a realistic multi-cellular dosimetry offered a better understanding of how absorbed dose to cell is affected as a function of key labeling parameters such as uptake ratio of activity within cells and cell density. The need to use cellular model over the conventional one was highlighted in the case of low cell densities and high activity incorporation into cells, especially when labeling with radionuclides emitting low range electrons such as 64Cu. The establishment of the dose-effect relationship for mesenchymal stem cells is under way through functional tests in vitro including clonogenic assay, proliferation ability and senescence induction after labeling with 18F-FDG and external irradiation for comparison.
- C. Botti et al (1997). Comparison of three different methods for radiolabelling human activated T lymphocytes. EJNM, 24:497–504. [Google Scholar]
- E. Miñana et al (2015). Quantification of the chromosomal radiation damage induced by labelling of leukocytes with [18F]FDG. Nucl. Med. Biol, 42:720–723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O. Detante et al (2009). Intravenous Administration of 99m Tc-HMPAO-Labeled Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells After Stroke : In Vivo Imaging and Biodistribution. Cell transplantation, 18:1369–1379. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- F. J. Gildehaus et al (2011). Impact of Indium-111 Oxine Labelling on Viability. Mol Imaging Biol, 13:1204–1214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Wolfs et al (2017). 18F-FDG Labeling of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells for PET Imaging: Effects on Ultrastructure and Differentiation Capacity. J. Nucl. Med, 447–455. [Google Scholar]
- M. Faraggi et al (1998). Original article Comparison of cellular and conventional dosimetry in assessing self-dose and cross-dose delivered to the cell nucleus by electron emissions, Eur J Nucl Med, 25:205–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- G. M. Makrigiorgos et al (1989). Limitations of Conventional Internal Dosimetry at the Cellular Level, J. Nucl. Med, 30:1856–1865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.