| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 16, 2019
“Results and Prospects of Geobotanical Research in Siberia”, dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the laboratory of ecology and geobotany of CSBG SB RAS
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00009 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191600009 | |
| Published online | 15 October 2019 | |
Prodromus of vegetation of Yakutia
1
M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, 58 Belinsky Str.,
Yakutsk,
677000, Russia
2
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 41 Lenin Ave.,
Yakutsk,
677980, Russia
3
Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 101 Zolotodolinskaya Str.,
Novosibirsk,
463090, Russia
* Corresponding author: sedum@mail.ru
A brief history of development of the Prodromus vegetation of Yakutia is given. The characteristic of classes is given in a table.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The use of Braun-Blanquet approach for classification of Yakutia vegetation was invigorated by Boris Mirkin, Professor of the Bashkir State University. In Yakutia, he guided the steps of a number of specialists of the Yakut State University in their postgraduate study of botany and landscapes. Under his scientific supervision, K.E. Kononov defended his doctoral dissertation on vegetation of the Lena River floodplain [1–5], E.I. Burtseva studied the meadows on saline soils of the Lena River valley [3,4], P.A. Gogoleva studied the vegetation of alas landscapes of the Lena-Amga Interfluve [2,4,5,6,7,8], and S.I. Mironova also studied the alas vegetation of the Lena-Vilyuy Interfluve as well as recovery of vegetation of technogenic landscapes [2,7,9,10,11].
The students and followers of Prof. Mirkin used Braun-Blanquet approach for classification of weed vegetation (N.P. Sleptsova) [12,13], a number of northern taiga and tundra plant communities (B.N. Pestryakov) [14–16], vegetation of the Vilyuy River basin (S.I. Poiseeva) [17–19], ruderal vegetation (M.M. Cherosov) [8,20,21,22], grazing land vegetation (L.D. Gavrilyeva) [10,23,24], forest and mountain vegetation (N.B. Ermakov, E.G. Nikolin) [25–29]. Recently, the works on tundra vegetation classification were conducted (M.Yu. Telyatnikov, N.N. Lashchinsky, E.I. Troeva) [30–33]. Aquatic vegetation classification is underway now (P.I. Kharlampyeva, V.A. Filippova) [34–35].
The long-term work yielded the Prodromus of vegetation of Yakutia. Its structure is represented now by the following units: 36 classes, 72 orders, 78 alliances, 216 associations, 112 subassociations, 63 variants, and 13 derivative and basal communities (Table).
As it is seen from the Table, riparian, meadow and anthropogenic vegetation is most properly studied. The higher rank units are given according to Ermakov (2012) [36].
References
- K.E. Kononov, Ecology of meadow vegetation of the Lena River floodplain, Diss. (M, 1982) [Google Scholar]
- K.E. Kononov, P.A. Gogoleva, S.I. Mironova, B.M. Mirkin, Classification of vegetation of the USSR my means offloristic criteria (M, 1986) [Google Scholar]
- B.M. Mirkin, E.I. Burtseva, K.E. Kononov, Biol. nauki, 9 (1984) [Google Scholar]
- B.M. Mirkin, K.E. Kononov, P.A. Gogoleva, E.I. Burtseva, L.G. Naumova, Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon, 27 (1992) [Google Scholar]
- B.M. Mirkin, P.A. Gogoleva, K.E. Kononov, Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon, 20 (1983) [Google Scholar]
- P.A. Gogoleva, Biol. Nauki, DEP, 246–83 (1983) [Google Scholar]
- P.A. Gogoleva, K.E. Kononov, B.M. Mirkin, S.I. Mironova, Sintaxonomy and simphytosociology of alas vegetation of Central Yakutia (Irkutsk, 1987) [Google Scholar]
- P.A. Gogoleva, M.M. Cherosov, S.G. Struchkova, E.D. Fedorova, Vestnik SVFU, 1(57) (2017) [Google Scholar]
- S.I. Mironova, Ecology, 5 (1983) [Google Scholar]
- S.I. Mironova, L.D. Gavrilyeva, Z.S. Pavlova, Nauch. Dokl. Bysch. Shkoly, 2485 (1990) [Google Scholar]
- O.I. Sumina, S.I. Mironova, Polar Geography, 27(3) (2005) [Google Scholar]
- N.P. Sleptsova, Bot. Zhurnal, 69(8) (1984) [Google Scholar]
- N.P. Sleptsova, Weed vegetation of Central Yakutia (an experience of floristic classification application), Diss. (Tartu, 1985) [Google Scholar]
- B.N. Pestryakov, P.A. Gogoleva, S.I. Mironova, DEP. AUISTI, 6289-B88 (1988) [Google Scholar]
- B.N. Pestryakov, Ecological-phytosociological characterization of the vegetation in the Yana River valley (northeastern Yakutia) and synanthropization processes. Diss. (Ufa, 1991) [Google Scholar]
- B.N. Pestryakov, P.A. Gogoleva, A.R. Ishbirdin, DEP. AUISTI, 3512-B92 (1992) [Google Scholar]
- S.I. Poiseeva, Nauka i obrazovanie, 2 (2004) [Google Scholar]
- S.I. Poiseeva, Problems of the study of vegetation cover of Yakutia (Yakutsk, Sakhapoligrafizdat, 2004) [Google Scholar]
- S.I. Poiseeva, Fundamentalnye issledovaniya, 2 (2005) [Google Scholar]
- P.A. Gogoleva, M.M. Cherosov, Z.S. Pavlova, B.M. Mirkin, DEP. AUISTI, B87 (1987) [Google Scholar]
- M.M. Cherosov, Synanthropic vegetation of Yakutia (Yakutsk, 2005) [Google Scholar]
- M.M. Cherosov, N.P. Sleptsova, S.I. Mironova, P.A. Gogoleva, Syntaxonomy of synanthropic vegetation of Yakutia (Yakutsk, 2005) [Google Scholar]
- L.D. Gavrilyeva, Pasture digression and rational use of alas vegetation of the Lena-Amga Interfluve, Diss. (Yakutsk, 1998) [Google Scholar]
- L.D. Gavrilyeva, Sib. Ecol. Zhurnal, 18(3) (2011) [Google Scholar]
- N.B. Ermakov, Hemiboreal forests of continental Northern Asia (classification, ordination, coenoflora analysis), Diss. (Novosibirsk, 2001) [Google Scholar]
- N.B. Ermakov, M.M. Cherosov, P.A. Gogoleva, Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon., 37 (2002) [Google Scholar]
- N.B. Ermakov, M.M. Cherosov, Annali di Botanica, 5 (2005) [Google Scholar]
- N.B. Ermakov, E.G. Nikolin, E.I. Troeva, M.M. Cherosov, Vestnik NGU, 7(4) (2009) [Google Scholar]
- N.B. Ermakov, E.G. Nikolin, E.I. Troeva, M.M. Cherosov, Vestnik NGU, 8(3) (2010) [Google Scholar]
- M. Yu. Telyatnikov, E.I. Troeva, P.A. Gogoleva, M.M. Cherosov, L.A. Pestryakova, S.A. Pristyazhnyuk, Flora of Asian Russia, 1(11) (2013) [Google Scholar]
- M. Yu. Telyatnikov, N.N. Laschinsky, E.I. Troeva, S.A. Pristyazhnyuk, P.A. Gogoleva, M.M. Cherosov, L.A. Pestryakova, Turczaninowia, 17 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- M. Yu. Telyatnikov, E.I. Troeva, S.A. Pristyazhnyuk, P.A. Gogoleva, M.M. Cherosov, L.A. Pestryakova, Turczaninowia, 18(4) (2015) [Google Scholar]
- M. Yu. Telyatnikov, E.I. Troeva, S.A. Pristyazhnyuk, M.M. Cherosov, Turczaninowia, 20(3) (2017) [Google Scholar]
- P.I. Kharlampyeva, P.A. Gogoleva, L.A. Frolova, Scientific notes of Kazan University, 153(2) (2011) [Google Scholar]
- V.A. Filippova, M.M. Cherosov, E.S. Neustroeva, I.I. Osipova, Byull. MOIP (2009) [Google Scholar]
- N.B. Ermakov, Modern condition of basic concepts of vegetation science (Ufa, 2012) [Google Scholar]
All Tables
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.