Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 17, 2020
International Scientific-Practical Conference “Agriculture and Food Security: Technology, Innovation, Markets, Human Resources” (FIES 2019)
Article Number 00033
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20201700033
Published online 28 February 2020

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

The production of animal feed is one of the main tasks for the increase in the productivity of animals. Feed mixtures prepared from several components of biologically active substances have a complete set of substances unlike other types of feed.

The production of high-quality animal feeds depends on the quality of mixing [1, 7]. The production of feed mixtures is carried out mainly in mixers of various designs, which should provide the required uniformity with minimal specific energy costs [28].

2 Material and methods

In order to improve and study the technological process of mixing the grain mixture the design of a continuous paddle mixing unit of bulk materials was developed in Samara State Agrarian University. The mixing chamber of the proposed unit is shown in Figure 1.

In order to determine the quality of mixing, productivity and power consumption, depending on the design parameters of the mixer, a factorial experiment was conducted.

X1 is the degree of the discharge window opening of the mixer (E = 25, 50 and 75%); X2 – shaft rotation frequency (n = 20, 30 and 40 min−1); X3 – the number of blades (z = 4, 6 and 8 pcs); v – mixing unevenness, %; Qdc – discharge capacity, kg/h; P – power, W.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

General view of mixing chamber: 1 – mixing chamber; 2 – shaft; 3 – helical blades; 4 – electric motor

3 Results

Table 1 presents the results of experiment.

In order to describe the mixing unevenness (%), a quadratic model is used in the coded value of factors:(1)

Correlation parameter – R=0.96024 and F-test=0.986528 indicate the adequacy of the model.

Mixing unevenness (%) in the natural values of factors is presented as a power function (Fig. 2):(2)

Correlation parameter − R=0.999946 and F-test=0.999766 indicate the adequacy of the model (Fig. 3) and the possibility of its use.

The least unevenness of the mixture is observed when the degree of tank fullness is 25% and the speed of rotation is 40 min−1 with 8 blades. The increase in the number of impacts of the blades improves the quality of the mixture.

In order to describe the mixer performance (kg/h), a quadratic model for natural values was used (Fig. 4):(3)

Correlation parameter − R=0.96687 and F-test=0.901448 indicate the adequacy of the model.

The increase in the degree of fullness and shaft speed increases the performance of the mixer. The highest mixer performance is provided by 6 blades. The best quality of the mixture is provided by 8 blades with a degree of fullness equal to 25% and rotation frequency of 40 min−1 with a mixer capacity of about 180 kg/h.

In order to describe the power on the mixer drive (kg/h), a power-law model for natural values was used (Fig. 4):(4)

Correlation parameter – R=0.95185 and F-test=0.9056094 indicate the adequacy of the model. Comparing the obtained observed and predicted values, the correlation parameter is determined: R = 0.97102. The value of F-test = 0.91393 indicates a confidence probability of the compliance with the samples of more than 90%, which indicates the adequacy of the model and the possibility of its use. The correspondence of the observed and predicted values is presented in Figure 6.

The increase of the shaft speed increases the power consumption of the mixer. The degree of tank fullness and the number of blades also increase power consumption, but to a lesser extent. The best quality of the mixture is provided by 8 blades with a degree of fullness of 25% and a rotation frequency of 40 min−1 with a mixer capacity of about 180 k /h and a power consumption of 270 watts.

Analysis of the quality of the mixture relative to the mass of the mixture Mk, attributable to the impact of the blade (kg/pc), allowed us to establish the dependence of the mixing unevenness (%) with the correlation coefficient of the results R=0.99369 and F-test=0.98141,(5)

From this expression, we can express the function of the calculated value of the mass of the mixture per one impact of the blade:(6)

The mass of the mixture attributable to the impact of the blade is initially determined, kg/pc:(7)

The results presented allow us to analyze the operation of the mixer based on simulation. From expressions (6) and (7) we express the mixing time T, as well as determine the performance of the mixer on mixing: Qcm = M/T (kg/s). Let us simulate the operation of the mixer based on the variable mass value of the prepared portion of the mixture and the required value of the mixture unevenness v (coefficient of variation of the control component).

An increase in portion weight requires an increase in mixing time (Fig. 7.a). Reducing the unevenness of the mixture also requires an increase in the duration of mixing. The most intensive increase in mixing time with unevenness of less than 10%. This significantly reduces the mixing performance of the mixer. Furthermore, performance practically does not depend on the mass of the prepared portion.

Table 1.

Mixer experiment results

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Two-dimensional sections of the mixture unevenness v (%) of the natural values of the factors: (a), (b), (c) - rotation speed n (min−1) and the number of blades z (pcs.) with a tank fullness degree of 25, 50, 75%; (d) – the degree of tank fullness E (%) and the rotational speed equal to n (min−1) with the number of blades equal to z = 8 pcs.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Results of the convergence verification of the predicted and observed values of the mixture unevenness v, %

thumbnail Fig. 4.

Two-dimensional sections of productivity Q (kg/h) of the natural values of factors: (a), (b), (c) – rotation speed n (min−1) and the number of blades z (pcs.) with tank fullness degree of 25, 50, 75%; (d) – tank fullness degree E (%) and the rotation speed equal to n (min−1) with the number of blades equal to z = 8 pcs.

thumbnail Fig. 5.

Two-dimensional sections of Power (W) of the drive unit of the mixer: (a), (b), (c) – rotation speed n (min−1) and the number of blades z (pcs.) with tank fullness degree of 25, 50, 75%; (d) – tank fullness degree E (%) and the rotation speed equal to n (min−1) with the number of blades equal to z = 8 pcs.

thumbnail Fig. 6.

Results of the convergence verification of the predicted and observed values of power, W

thumbnail Fig. 7.

The simulation results of the effect of the mass of the prepared portion of the mixture M (kg) and the unevenness of the mixture v (%) on: the required mixing time T (sec) and continuous mixing productivity of 3600Qcm (kg/h) with a constant degree of filling of the mixer - 20%.

4 Conclusion

The increase in the degree of fullness and shaft speed increases the performance of the mixer. The highest mixer performance is provided by 6 blades. The increase of the shaft speed increases the power consumption of the mixer. The degree of tank fullness and the number of blades also increase power consumption, but to a lesser extent. The best quality of the mixture is provided by 8 blades with a degree of fullness equal to 25% and a rotation frequency of 40 min−1 with the mixer capacity of about 180 kg/h and a power consumption of 270 watts.

The duration of mixing and productivity in the continuous mode in the event of a change in the mass of the prepared portion while ensuring a constant degree of filling the mixer container and its structural and kinematic parameters is mainly affected by the required unevenness of the mixture. When improving the unevenness of the mixture from the original 20% to the desired 10%, the productivity decreases 5.7 times, if up to 5% – then 13.7 times.

References

  • M.V. Borisova, V.V. Novikov, V.V. Konovalov, Analytical justification of the performance of a mixer of bulk materials with helical blades, Bull. of the Samara State Agricult. Univer., 1, 69–78 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V.F. Pershin, Y.T. Selivanov, A.V. Orlov, Use of numerical experiments for optimization of mixing of granular materials, Theoret. Foundat. of Chem. Engineer., 38(2), 195–200 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.V. Fomina, Justification of the parameters of narrow flat blades of a high-speed mixer of loose components, Innovat. technique and technol., 4(05), 30–33 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  • Y.T. Selivanov, V.F. Pershin, Experimental study of the mixing of disperse materials with different particle sizes, Theoret. Foundat. of Chem. Engineer., 35(2), 206–208 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Soni et al., Compact coiled flow inverter for process intensification, Chem.l Engineer. Sci., 193, 312–324 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Chupshev, V. Konovalov, M. Fomina, Optimization in work modeling of a mixer, J. of Phys.: Conf. Ser., IOP Publish., 1084(1), 012010 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.M. Vedischev, A.V. Prokhorov, N.V. Kolshev, Mixer of dry feed mixtures, Issues of modern sci. and pract. Univer. named after Vernadsky, 4(42), 326–328 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  • V.F. Pershin, Y.T. Selivanov, Calculations on a drum mixer with ordered loading, Chem. and petrol. Engineer., 38(1), 53–57 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1.

Mixer experiment results

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

General view of mixing chamber: 1 – mixing chamber; 2 – shaft; 3 – helical blades; 4 – electric motor

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Two-dimensional sections of the mixture unevenness v (%) of the natural values of the factors: (a), (b), (c) - rotation speed n (min−1) and the number of blades z (pcs.) with a tank fullness degree of 25, 50, 75%; (d) – the degree of tank fullness E (%) and the rotational speed equal to n (min−1) with the number of blades equal to z = 8 pcs.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Results of the convergence verification of the predicted and observed values of the mixture unevenness v, %

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

Two-dimensional sections of productivity Q (kg/h) of the natural values of factors: (a), (b), (c) – rotation speed n (min−1) and the number of blades z (pcs.) with tank fullness degree of 25, 50, 75%; (d) – tank fullness degree E (%) and the rotation speed equal to n (min−1) with the number of blades equal to z = 8 pcs.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5.

Two-dimensional sections of Power (W) of the drive unit of the mixer: (a), (b), (c) – rotation speed n (min−1) and the number of blades z (pcs.) with tank fullness degree of 25, 50, 75%; (d) – tank fullness degree E (%) and the rotation speed equal to n (min−1) with the number of blades equal to z = 8 pcs.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6.

Results of the convergence verification of the predicted and observed values of power, W

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7.

The simulation results of the effect of the mass of the prepared portion of the mixture M (kg) and the unevenness of the mixture v (%) on: the required mixing time T (sec) and continuous mixing productivity of 3600Qcm (kg/h) with a constant degree of filling of the mixer - 20%.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.