Issue 
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 17, 2020
International ScientificPractical Conference “Agriculture and Food Security: Technology, Innovation, Markets, Human Resources” (FIES 2019)



Article Number  00041  
Number of page(s)  5  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20201700041  
Published online  28 February 2020 
Theory and practice of feed silage in containers made of airtight film
^{1}
Ryazan State Agrotechnological University, 390044 Ryazan, Russia
^{2}
The Academy of Law Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 390000 Ryazan, Russia
^{3}
Ryazan State Radio Engineering University named after V. F. Utkin, 390005 Ryazan, Russia
^{4}
Ryazan State Medical University, 390026 Ryazan, Russia
^{5}
Kazakh National Agrarian University, 050010 Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
^{*} Corresponding author: mamonov.agrotexnol@yandex.ru
The article provides a brief analysis of research results in the field of preparation and storage of silage feed. A brief description of the innovative energy – resource saving technology for the preparation and storage of silage in vacuumprocessed containers made from an airtight film is given. The theory of compaction of feed in a container due to its selfweight of the silage and vacuum pressure is presented. It is shown that only vacuum gauge pressure acts on the top of a container, and the difference between the gauge pressure and the lateral and axial pressure, respectively act on the side and bottom of it. The practice of using vacuumprocessed containers during silage has shown that a compacted layer is formed over the entire surface of the obtained monolith, which prevents the exit of juice and air from silage. With the porosity of the mass approaching zero, the density of grinded mass of plants approaches the density of their stems and further compaction of silage is senseless. Sufficient vacuum for silage is 60–70 kPa. The density of the compressed silage monoliths in this case is 700–800 kg/m^{3}.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
One of the most important feeds in diets of farm animals is silage. It is enough to say that for cattle, for example, it comprises up to 40, and sometimes more percent of nutritional value [1, 2]. Nowadays the main crop for the preparation of silage is corn [3].
Analyzing modern methods of feed silage, it is necessary to note a number of significant drawbacks in their application. These include: high costs for the construction of tranches and towers; large losses of silage and nutrients, reaching 10–25% [4], and sometimes more; high acidification of silage mass [5–7]. Most studies are devoted to the biology of silage process [5–9]. Only in recent decades, the study of the effect of vacuum on the process of silage of feed began [10, 11].
All the existing technologies are associated with mechanical compaction of silage mass [3]. The authors propose a technology with compaction of silage by vacuum in containers of airtight film [12].
The essence of this technology is as follows. The harvesting of green mass is carried out in the usual way: mowing, grinding and loading of grinded mass into vehicles are carried out by a forage harvester. In case study, the grinded mass is loaded into a special container made of an airtight film, which is placed in a transport bag, which, in turn, is placed and suspended in a cassette.
The container filled with a silage mass is first hermetically closed, and then air is pumped out of it by a vacuum pump, that is, it is vacuumprocessed. The containers are delivered for storage using vehicles with manipulators. The feed is stored almost close to the airless environment.
2 Materials and methods
For the experiments, corn was chosen as the most used in agricultural production for silage of feed. Due to the fact that it is proposed to carry out the silage in sealed containers made from an airtight film, it is necessary to take into account the changes in the density and porosity of silage mass depending on the initial bulk mass of grinded feed, as well as its compaction under the influence of its selfweight and vacuum pressure.
The density of the corn stalks was determined by the pycnometric method, that is, a cut stalk was first weighed and then lowered into a measuring container with liquid, and the volume of the stalk was determined by the difference in volumes before and after immersion. The ratio of the mass of the stalk to the volume gives its density. The ratio of the mass of grinded particles of corn to the volume of the tank into which they are put gives their bulk mass. The porosity n of the silage mass was determined by the formula:(1)
where ρ – density of corn stalks, kg/ m^{3};
γ  bulk mass of corn particles, kg/ m^{3}.
During the course of the research the authors consider the process of compaction of silage in a soft container under the action of its selfweight and vacuum. In order to simplify the theoretical study of the process, the authors apply the principle of independence of the action of forces, thus they consider separately the compaction of the material from its selfweight (Fig. 1) and vacuum and then the results are added [13].
At a distance X from the top of the container, pressure will act on the elementary layer of material of thickness dX:
P_{x} – axial pressure from selfweight from the top;
P_{x} + dP_{x} – axial pressure from selfweight from the bottom;
P_{s} – lateral pressure of a thrust of material from selfweight;
F – frictional force from lateral pressure.
The elementary friction force F is determined by the formula(2)
where f – coefficient of friction of the material on the walls of the container;
Π  perimeter of the container cross section.
Lateral pressure arising under the action of its selfweight is determined using the equation(3)
where ξ – side thrust coefficient.
The equation of equilibrium of the material layer in projection onto the vertical axis of the container is the following(4)
When the necessary transformations are made and the variables are divided, the following equation is obtained:(5)
where S – container crosssectional area
Integrating the left side of the equation in the range from P = 0 to P, and the right from 0 to X the authors define the law of distribution of axial pressure along the height of the container(6)
where P – axial pressure from selfweight from the bottom, or(7)
where q – Density of material;
g – gravity factor.
The axial pressure to the mass from the top will be zero, and from the bottom it will be determined by the formula(8)
where H – the height of the container.
For a cube, the height and length of the rib are equal to H; therefore, formula (7) takes the form(9)
For monoliths of cylindrical shape and height H, the formula will have the form(10)
where d – diameter of pressed monolith.
The authors consider the compaction of the material caused by the exposure to the vacuum. The magnitude of the vacuum pressure P_{v} on the material is determined by the formula(11)
where P_{a}– atmospheric pressure;
P_{r} – residual air pressure in the container.
Since the vacuum pressure acts on all faces of the cube volume and with the same force, and the forces of opposite faces are directed towards each other and of the same magnitude, therefore, in the center of the cube, the pressure caused by the vacuum will be zero.
The pressure on the upper face of the cube during vacuum processing will be equal to P_{v}, and the lower face will be determined by the formula(12)
The pressure on the side faces of R_{rs} is determined by the formula(13)
Thus, it was found that the vacuum pressure acts only on the upper face, the lower face is affected by the pressure difference between the vacuum and axial pressure from gravity and the difference between the vacuum pressure and the pressure of the lateral thrust acts on the lateral faces and depends on the parameters of the container, the friction coefficients and the lateral thrust of the silage material and its density.
Figure 2 shows an approximate diagram of the distribution of pressures on the lateral face of selfweight of the material and vacuum pressure. It can be seen from the figure that the total pressure in the lower part of the container decreases by the pressure of the lateral thrust. If P_{v} <P, then juice may flow out of the compressed monolith, and when P_{v}> P, juice does not flow out, which is usually in practice.
Fig. 1. Scheme of effective pressures causing compaction of the material from its selfweight. 
Fig. 2. Diagram of the distribution of pressures in a container with silage to the lateral face during vacuum processing: 1 – diagram of lateral pressure, 2 – diagram of vacuum pressure, 3 – resultant diagram. 
3 Results
The results of experiments on the determination of the density of corn stalks with one or two ears, or without them, with an average length of 2.08 m and a mass of 0.714 kg showed that their density depends on humidity and ranges from 730 to 850 kg/m^{3} with a corresponding humidity of 63 to 74%. The volumetric mass of ground corn stalks collected from the same field was at the above moisture content in the range from 370 to 450 kg/m^{3}.
The porosity of the silage mass n depending on the density of corn stalks (for example, at its value of 800 kg/m^{3}) is shown in the graphical dependence (Fig. 3).
The graphical dependence shows that with the increase in the bulk mass of the silage culture, leads to the decrease of its porosity. The dashed line on the left indicates that, theoretically, with the bulk mass approaching zero, its porosity approaches 1. The dashed line on the right indicates that when the bulk mass of the feed approaches the density of the stalk itself, the porosity approaches zero.
Such a phenomenon is possible only when compaction of the ground mass occurs. This indicates that all the air is displaced from the grinded mass and there is no sense in the compaction of the silage mass, as further compaction will deform the particles themselves, squeeze the juice out of them and deteriorate the quality of the feed.
The experiments under laboratory and field conditions show that when a vacuum is applied to the silage, a solid layer appears on its surface, which prevents the exit of juice and air from the formed monolith. This happens if the axial pressure is less than vacuum one.
Therefore, in order to keep the juice in a compacted monolith, it is necessary to increase the vacuum pressure as the height of the container increases. The appearance of juice at the bottom of the container may also indicate that, the deformation of particles of the silage mass occurs and juice is squeezed out of them when a vacuum is too high. Therefore, the density of silage feed can not be increased more than the density of the stalks themselves. It should be depending on the silage culture in the range from 680 to 820 kg/m^{3}.
The results of the experiments on the determination of the quality of silage from the same mass of corn harvested simultaneously showed that silage in vacuumprocessed containers contained 21.9% more protein, 20% more carotene at ph 4.3 compared to silage, prepared in tranches. The moisture content of the silage in vacuumprocessed containers was slightly higher than that prepared in the tranches, which confirmed the assumptions about the pinching of a part of the juice in the silage mass during vacuum processing.
Fig. 3. Graphical dependence of the porosity of grinded corn stalks on their bulk density at a density of 800 kg/m^{3}. 
4 Discussion
The experiment shows that for the successful implementation of the preparation and storage of silage in vacuumprocessed containers, the complex of equipment must contain: feed harvesting units, equipment for receiving green grinded mass, equipment for silage and vacuum processing of containers, loading and delivering containers in transport bags to storage places.
The results of experiments on the determination of the porosity of the silage mass showed that when the porosity of the silage mass approaches the density of the stalks from which it is made, the deformation of the particles begins, which leads to the release of juice from them. Therefore, when vacuum processing the silage mass there is no sense to exceed the vacuum value more than the permissible one in order to compact it.
It was theoretically established that compaction of the silage mass under the action of its selfweight follows exponential law and depends on the height of the fill in the container, the friction coefficients and the lateral thrust.
The compaction under the action of vacuum acts volumetrically and therefore only vacuum pressure acts in the container on top of the compacted monolith and the difference between the vacuum pressure and, respectively, axial and lateral acts only from the bottom and sides. Empirically it was established that during vacuum processing, a compacted layer is formed on the surface of the monolith, which prevents the exit of juice and air from its middle. At a vacuum gauge below axial pressure, juice can exit from the middle of the monolith, which is also empirically confirmed.
5 Conclusion
Thus, the above mentioned complex of equipment allows the preparation of grinded green mass, loading it into containers of airtight film, silage and vacuum processing of containers, and delivering containers with silage mass to storage places. It was theoretically revealed that the compaction of the silage mass can be carried out both by means of its selfweight and vacuum. It was established that it is not advisable to conduct compaction of the grinded silage mass above the density of the stalks themselves due to increased energy costs and increased juice production. A sufficient vacuum pressure for corn silage is 60–70 kPa. In this case, the silage is of high quality.
References
 A.P. Kalashnikov, Norms and diets for feeding farm animals: a reference guide (Nauka, Moscow, 2003) [Google Scholar]
 S.N. Khokhrin, Feeds and feeding animals (Lan, St. Petersburg, 2002) [Google Scholar]
 L.G. Boyarsky, Feed technology and fullfledged feeding of farm animals (Phoenix, RostovonDon, 2001) [Google Scholar]
 T. Keller, H. Nonn, H. Jeroch, The effect of sealing and of additives on the fermentation characteristics and mould and yeast counts in stretch film wrapped bigbale Lucerne silage, Arch. Tierernahr., 51 (1998) [Google Scholar]
 J.M. Asplund, Principles of Protein Nutrition of Ruminants (CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994) [Google Scholar]
 R. Erdman, Silage Fermentation Characteristics Affecting Feed Intake, in Proc. National Silage Product. Conf., vol. 210 (Syracuse, New York, 1993) [Google Scholar]
 J.H. Harrison, R. Blauwiekel, M.R. Stokes, Fermentation and utilization of grass silage , J. Dairy Sci., 77 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 L. Kung, R. Shaver, Interpretation and use of silage fermentation analysis reports, Focus on Forage, 3, 13 (University of Winconsing Extrnsion, 2001) [Google Scholar]
 P. McDonald, N. Henderson, S. Heron, The Biochemistry of Silage (Chalcombe Publications, UK, 1991) [Google Scholar]
 D.V. Ivanov, Modes and technical means of preparing silage crops in packages with reduced pressure of gas medium (Theses, Stavropol, 2010) [Google Scholar]
 H.E. Johnson, R.J. Merry, D.R. Davies, D.B. Kell, M.K. Theodorou, G.W. Griffith, Vacuum packing: a model system for laboratoryscale silage fermentations, J. of Appl. Microbiol. (2005) [Google Scholar]
 V.F. Nekrashevich, I.V. Vorobyova, K.S. Afanasyeva, M.A. Borontova, A.E. Belov, Preparation and storage of silage in soft vacuum processed containers from an airtight film, Feed production, 10 (2017) [Google Scholar]
 V.F. Nekrashevich, A.S. Popov, K.S. Afanasyeva, The use of vacuum during the compaction of silage in containers from airtight film, Bull. of the Ulyanovsk Agricult. Acad., 3 (2017) [Google Scholar]
All Figures
Fig. 1. Scheme of effective pressures causing compaction of the material from its selfweight. 

In the text 
Fig. 2. Diagram of the distribution of pressures in a container with silage to the lateral face during vacuum processing: 1 – diagram of lateral pressure, 2 – diagram of vacuum pressure, 3 – resultant diagram. 

In the text 
Fig. 3. Graphical dependence of the porosity of grinded corn stalks on their bulk density at a density of 800 kg/m^{3}. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.