Open Access
Table 1.
Economic efficiency of various methods of preserving and preparing forage grains, RUB / t
| Indicators \ Fodder | Dry grains | Raw grains | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation method | |||
| Natural drying | Artificial drying | Using powedered sulfur | |
| Harvested area, гa | 30 | ||
| Grain yield, t/ha: with natural humidity | 2.38 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| in dry matter | 1.88 | 1.88 | 1.97 |
| Natural grain yield, t | 71.4 | 75 | 75 |
| Dry matter yield, t | 56.4 | 56.4 | 59.1 |
| Cost of grain in the original mass | 3733 | 2949 | 2949 |
| Direct operating costs In total | 2481.95 | 3710.27 | 2255.06 |
| Including when: clearing the pile | 53.77 | 56.48 | ‐ |
| drying | ‐ | 1225.61 | ‐ |
| threshing | 2428.18 | 2428.18 | ‐ |
| flattering | ‐ | ‐ | 1966.46 |
| preservativetreatmentandpackaginginaplastic sleeve | ‐ | ‐ | 288.6 |
| Total: | 6214.95 | 6659.27 | 5204.06 |
| In terms of 1 t of dry matter | 7226.69 | 9513.24 | 7434.37 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.