Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 27, 2020
International Scientific-Practical Conference “Agriculture and Food Security: Technology, Innovation, Markets, Human Resources” (FIES 2020)
Article Number 00054
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202700054
Published online 25 November 2020

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes infection (Listeriosis) is a naturally-anthropurgic sapronotic widespread infectious disease that affects many species of animals and people. It is characterized by clinical polymorphism from asymptomatic carriage and subclinical to severe generalized forms of meningitis and meningoencephalitis, nervous system disorders, septicemia, abortions, mastitis and high mortality [15].

A Listeria monocytogenes pathogen is a Grampositive multiform non-spore-forming bacterium that is very stable in the environment and has multiple transmission routes [69]. A variety of Listeriosis clinical manifestations, including asymptomatic course and Listeria carrying, as well as certain difficulties in isolating a pure culture, make it difficult to diagnose the disease [10, 11].

Listeriosis affects many animal species, causes great damage to animal husbandry [12] and poses a serious threat to human health. However, methods for detecting Listeria carriers and retrospective diagnosis of Listeriosis are not well developed. In this respect, allergy diagnosis is of considerable interest.

The endeavors to obtain a specific L. allergen and develop an allergy diagnosis of Listeriosis, undertaken by individual researchers [13, 14], showed an allergyinduced transformation of the body infected with Listeria monocytogenes. More successful studies were conducted by T.I. Egshatyan [15], but to date, a specific allergen and allergic diagnosis of Listeriosis have not been used in veterinary science and medicine.

In view of the foregoing, the aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of L. allergen obtained for detecting animals and Listeria carriers that had Listeriosis.

2 Material and methods

L. allergen was obtained from the AUV L. monocytogenes biomass according to our method. A fraction isolated from the Listeria biomass was a polypeptide with a molecular weight of 10 kDa. The allergen was standardized against a protein content (100 μg/ml).

The experiments were performed on outbred guinea pigs with a live weight of 280–350 g and white giant rabbits. The guinea pigs and rabbits were sensitized by infection with a sublethal dose (100 million microbial cells) of the virulent T-71 Listeria strain. A suspension of 2-day L. monocytogenes agar culture was administered subcutaneously in a volume of 1 cm3. Then these animals were subject to intradermal allergy testing. To establish a specific feature of Listeria allergen, an allergy test was performed that required administering 0.1 ml of allergen strictly into the dermis layer of guinea pigs infected with Salmonella and E. coli.

In rabbits, blood for research was taken from the marginal ear vein. A suspension of Listeria cells with a concentration of billion microbial cells inactivated by autoclaving at 1 atmosphere for 30 minutes was used as an antigen in the formulation of the agglutination reaction (AR).

3 Results

After 1 month following Listeria infection through intradermal L. allergen tests, the reaction was positive in all animals. A positive allergic reaction began after 16–18 hours in the area of allergen administration in all animals sensitized by Listeria. It was characterized by the development of an inflammatory reaction (hyperemia, edema, soreness, and swelling up), the diameter of which reached 15–20 mm 24–48 hours later. A local inflammatory reaction of the delayed hypersensitivity type was accompanied by a greater thickness of the skin fold by 1.7–2.0 times by 24 hours after injection (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Following an intradermal allergen injection, the local allergic reaction reached a maximum level 48 hours later and almost completely died out after 72 hours. After 1 month all L. sensitized guinea pigs gave a positive reaction when tested for Listeriosis.

A local reaction to allergen injection was negative in guinea pigs infected with Salmonella and Escherichia coli, which indicates a specific feature of the allergen and allergic reaction.

Following 2 months after Listeria infection, all guinea pigs had a positive reaction to the allergen, and the intensity of the local reaction was at least 1 month later.

After 3 months following Listeria infection through intradermal L. allergen tests, the reaction was positive in all animals, 4 out of 10 guinea pigs (40 %) gave a negative reaction, which indicates a gradual allergic response decrement.

This is consistent with immune responses, since allergic reactions such as delayed hypersensitivity are one of the body’s immune responses to an antigenic excitator. Therefore, the next series of experiments performed on rabbits, along with allergic reaction, addressed antibody response as well.

To deal with the correlation of allergic reaction with Listeria carrying, experiments were performed on five rabbits that were infected with a culture of T-71 Listeria strain at a dose of 100 million microbial cells. Then they were examined serologically for an agglutination reaction (AR) and an allergic intradermal L. test (monthly from 1 to 6 months).

The test results are summarized in Table 2 and Fig. 2

Following 1 month after infection, all rabbits responded positively to the administration of allergen, and also had specific antibodies in a titer of 1:120. Antibodies persisted for up to 3 months, albeit in low titers (1:48).

However, after three months, the allergic reaction in four rabbits was positive. After 4 and 5 months, all rabbits in AR responded negatively, whereas the allergic reaction was positive in 60 and 20 %, respectively. 6 months after infection, one of the rabbits alone had an allergic reaction.

During bacteriological studies of pathological material from this rabbit, a Listeria culture was isolated from the mesenteric lymph node, which, according to the cultural-morphological properties, corresponded to the initial strain of L. monocytogenes.

Table 1.

Allergic reaction indices in guinea pigs (n = 10)

Table 2.

Results of allergic test and serological studies of rabbits infected with L. monocytogenes

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Indicators of allergic reaction in guinea pigs

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Results of allergy test and serological studies of rabbits infected with L. monocytogenes

4 Discussion

When guinea pigs and rabbits were infected with sublethal doses of virulent L. monocytogenes strain, no clinical manifestations of Listeriosis were observed. However, infecting guinea pigs and rabbits with a Listeriosis pathogen was followed by an allergic reaction against delayed-type hypersensitivity, which is one of the forms of immune restructuring.

L. allergen injection was followed by a local reaction after 16-18 hours. It reached a maximum 48 hours later, then faded away almost completely 72 hours later, which is typical of delayed-type allergic reactions. In all guinea pigs, a positive allergic reaction was recorded 1 and 2 months after infection, and after three months, just 60% of sensitized animals responded positively.

An L. allergic intradermal test resulted in a negative reaction in guinea pigs infected with Salmonella and E. coli, as well as in intact animals.

Infecting rabbits with a Listeriosis pathogen was followed by an allergy-induced transformation of the organism against delayed-type hypersensitivity and the synthesis of specific antibodies. The allergic reaction remained positive in some sensitized rabbits (20%) until 6 months, and antibodies were lost after 3 months.

A Listeria culture was isolated from the rabbit that responded positively to an allergen.

The findings indicate that the obtained Listeriose allergen and intradermal allergic reaction are highly specific: the intact animals and those infected with Salmonellosis and Colibacteriosis showed no local reaction after the administration of allergen, as evidenced by the absence of a local positive reaction in animals infected with Salmonella and Colibacteriosis pathogens.

5 Conclusion

Infecting animals with a Listeriosis pathogen causes an allergic reaction against delayed-type hypersensitivity, which is detected by an intradermal test with a Listeriose allergen and is highly specific.

The allergic reaction persists for a longer time after infection of animals with Listeriosis pathogen in comparison with antibodies and, to a certain extent, correlates with Listeriosis carrying.

Thus, the results indicate the possibility of a retrospective diagnosis of Listeriosis and Listeriosis carrying in animals with an allergy test. The allergen is based on the method developed by the authors.

References

  • I.N. Musabaev, Modern aspects of Listeriosis in the Republic of Kazakhstan, Med. J. of Western Kazakhstan 4(36), 6–11 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  • I.S. Tartakovsky, S.A. Ermolaeva, V.V. Maleev, Listeria pathogenesis factors and their role in the pathogenesis and laboratory diagnosis of listeriosis, J. of Microbiol., Epidemiol., Immunol. 4, 31–36 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  • V.D. Stepanyuk, Epizootic Dictionary (Harvest, Kiev, 1976), 118 p. [Google Scholar]
  • A.V. Shcherbina, S.V. Mezentsev, O.S. Spirkina, Listeria in the products of meat processing enterprises, Bull. of the Altai State Agrar. Univer. 8(118), 101–104 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  • I.A. Bakulov, D.A. Vasiliev, D.V. Kolbasov, Listeria and listeriosis, Monograph (Color-Print, Ulyanovsk, 2016), 336 p. [Google Scholar]
  • I.S. Tartakovsky, V.V. Maleev, S.A. Ermolaeva, Listeria: role in human infectious pathology and laboratory diagnosis (Medicine for all, Moscow, 2002), 195 p. [Google Scholar]
  • I.A. Bakulov, M.G. Tarshis, Geography of animal diseases in foreign countries (Kolos, Moscow, 1971), 216 p. [Google Scholar]
  • R.F. Lamont, J. Sobel, Sh. Mazakitovi, Listeriosis in human pregnancy: a systematic review, J. of perinatal med. 39(3), 227–236 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.P. Krasikov, I.G. Trofimov, I.G. Alekseeva, M.V. Zabolotnykh, Comprehensive diagnosis of associative infectious diseases of cattle, Veter. Pathol. 1(47), 13–21 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  • J.A. Vazquez-Boland, M. Kuhn, P. Berche et al., Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants, Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14, 584–640 (2001) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • J.C. Low, W. Donachie, A review of listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis, Veter. J. 153(1), 9–29 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V.V. Slivko, Listeriosis of farm animals (Vologda, 1954), 136 p. [Google Scholar]
  • T.D. Tropina, P.R. Khashimova, L.A. Kondratyeva, The biological activity of an allergen isolated from listeria, in: Problems of Regional Infectious Pathology and Hygiene (Dushanbe, 1984), pp. 105–107 [Google Scholar]
  • A.P. Egorova, M.Ya. Martynin, A.N. Malyshev, The diagnostic value of an intradermal allergic test for listeriosis, J. of Microbiol. 2, 62–70 (1970) [Google Scholar]
  • T.I. Egshatyan, Production technology of immunobiological preparations for the diagnosis of listeriosis and indication of its pathogen, PhD Dissertation (Stavropol, 2002), 160 p. [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1.

Allergic reaction indices in guinea pigs (n = 10)

Table 2.

Results of allergic test and serological studies of rabbits infected with L. monocytogenes

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Indicators of allergic reaction in guinea pigs

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Results of allergy test and serological studies of rabbits infected with L. monocytogenes

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.