Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2021
VI International Scientific Conference “Problems of Industrial Botany of Industrially Developed Regions” 2021
Article Number 00018
Number of page(s) 3
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213100018
Published online 13 August 2021

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Our earlier publications [14] were devoted to the microbiological conversion of white phosphorus to biogenic phosphate. The work performed by our team is the first example of the assimilation of the artificial xenobiotic white phosphorus by the biosphere. Nevertheless, biodegradation sometimes leads to the formation of more toxic substances, A.KA. “lethal metabolites”. Some of them exhibit genotoxicity, leading to an increase in the number of mutations and the emergence of neoplastic disorders. Therefore, the study of biodegradation of xenobiotics should be accompanied by testing for genotoxicity.

2 Materials and Methods

The SOS-lux test was performed as described in [5]. To assess the cytogenetic effect of phosphorus on eukaryotic cells, the Allium cepa test system was used [6].

The Toxicological Profile of White Phosphorus for 1997 [7] reports the absence of genotoxicity of this substance. In our case, when the Salmonella typhimurium TA1538 strain was incubated in a medium with white phosphorus for 1 hour, the number of mutants did not increase but fell from 10.09 ± 0.81 to 9.0 ± 0.72. In the positive control with the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine mutagen, their number increased to 22.5 ± 3.1. Thus, the genotoxicity of a culture medium with white phosphorus and its metabolites were not observed during this test results.

In assessing the mutagenic and antimutagenic properties of white phosphorus using the SOS-lux test, strong mutagens, the antitumor antibiotic mitomycin C, and hydrogen peroxide were used as controls.

3 Results

In comparison to peroxide, white phosphorus turned out to be a weak DNA damaging agent (Fig. 1). However, the concentration of H2O2 in the experiment was 0.03%, while that of white phosphorus, was 62.5 μg / ml, corresponding to 0.00625%. Thus, the P4 concentration was 4.8 times lower than that of peroxide. Since higher concentrations of white phosphorus have a detrimental effect on Salmonella, it was difficult to reliably assess the genotoxicity of P4 in this bacterium. Although it can be assumed that with an increase in DNA concentration, the damaging activity of P4 should only increase. Hence, the low genotoxicity of white phosphorus cannot be generalized due to its comparatively high toxicity tocells. A weaker but significant DNA damaging activity of white phosphorus was registered even after diluting the medium, containing 0.2% P4 to 0.01%.

It was shown that the presence of white phosphorus leads to lagged growth of onion roots (Fig. 2). It was also found that the mitotic activity of tissues in contact with P4 significantly reduces in comparison to the control, which indicates amitotoxic activity of P4. Analysis of the ratios of mitotic phases showed an augmented proportion of cells at the prophase stage with a corresponding decline in the percentage of other stages (Table 1). This may be due to a blockage of cell division at the end of the prophase stage.

thumbnail Fig. 1

The effect of white phosphorus on SOS induction with hydrogen peroxide relative to the negative control (medium without mutagen). P4 at a concentration of 62.5 μg / ml is a weak mutagen compared to peroxide. P4 at a concentration of 1000 μg / ml is lethal to microbes after 9 hours of incubation. In the control, SOS induction also slightly increases, which is associated with the growth of the culture and the accumulation of DNA (accordingly, the number of its damages also increases, even in the absence of the mutagen).

thumbnail Fig. 2

A clear demonstration of the phytotoxicity of white phosphorus: in its presence (B), the roots significantly lag in growth relative to the control (A). The concentration of P4 in the tested sample was 0.016%. The picture was taken 48 hours after the start of germination.

Table 1

Mitotic index at various concentrations of white phosphorus

4 Conclusions

The discovery of genotoxic properties in white phosphorus is not surprising, given the high chemical activity of this substance. However, in earlier studies, P4 genotoxicity was not found. Perhaps this was due to insufficient depth of research, after all until now, the genotoxicity of white phosphorus was only determined by the Ames test, which always showed a negative result. This is probably the first time the SOS-lux and the Allium testshave been applied for this purpose, to assess DNA damage and chromosome misalignment. With these methods, the genotoxicity of white phosphorus was demonstrated.

References

  • A.Z. Mindubaev, A.D. Voloshina, E.V. Babynin, E.K. Badeeva, Kh.R. Khayarov, S.T. Minzanova, D.G. Yakhvarov, Ecology and Industry of Russia, 22(1), 33–37 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  • A.Z. Mindubaev, E.V. Babynin, A.D. Voloshina, K.A. Saparmyradov, Y.A. Akosah, E.K. Badeeva, S.T. Minzanova, L.G. Mironova, News of nAs RK. Series of geology and technical sciences, 5(437), 122–128 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  • A.Z. Mindubaev, S.V. Kuznetsova, V.G. Evtyugin, A.G. Daminova, T.V. Grigoryeva, Y.D. Romanova, V.A. Romanova, V.M. Babaev, D.N. Buzyurova, E.V. Babynin, E.K. Badeeva, S.T. Minzanova, L.G. Mironova., Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 56(2), 194–201 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  • A.Z. Mindubaev, S.V. Fedosimova, T.V. Grigoryeva, V.A. Romanova, V.M. Babaev, D.N. Buzyurova, E.V. Babynin, E.K. Badeeva, S.T. Minzanova, L.G. Mironova, Y.A. Akosah, J.V. Karaeva, Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, 11(1), 69–79 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  • D.L. Cooper, S.T. Lovett, DNA Repair (Amst), 10(3), 260–270 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  • W. Wang, J. W. Gorsuch, J. S. Hughes. Plants for Environmental Studies (6005 J.S. (Eds), New York, NY: CRC Lewis Publishers, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  • P. Duerksen-Hughes, P. Richter, L. Ingerman, W. Ruoff, S. Thampi, S. Donkin. Toxicological profile for white phosphorus (U.S. Department of health and human services, 1997). [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Mitotic index at various concentrations of white phosphorus

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

The effect of white phosphorus on SOS induction with hydrogen peroxide relative to the negative control (medium without mutagen). P4 at a concentration of 62.5 μg / ml is a weak mutagen compared to peroxide. P4 at a concentration of 1000 μg / ml is lethal to microbes after 9 hours of incubation. In the control, SOS induction also slightly increases, which is associated with the growth of the culture and the accumulation of DNA (accordingly, the number of its damages also increases, even in the absence of the mutagen).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

A clear demonstration of the phytotoxicity of white phosphorus: in its presence (B), the roots significantly lag in growth relative to the control (A). The concentration of P4 in the tested sample was 0.016%. The picture was taken 48 hours after the start of germination.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.