Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 79, 2023
2nd International Conference on Maritime Education (ICOME 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 11002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Assessing the Impact of English Language Education on Maritime Students | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237911002 | |
| Published online | 08 December 2023 | |
- Yercan, F., Fricke, D., & Stone, L. (2005). Developing a model on improving maritime English training for maritime transportation safety. Educational Studies, 31(2), 213-234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Trenkner, P. (2005, October). The IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases– refreshing memories to refresh motivation. In Proceedings of the IMLA 17th International Maritime English Conference (pp. 1-17). [Google Scholar]
- Solas, I. M. O. (2002). International convention for the safety of life at sea (solas). International Maritime Organization, London. [Google Scholar]
- Statista. (2016). The most spoken languages worldwide. Retrieved on August 5, 2016, from http://www.statista.com/statistics/266808/the-most-spoken-languages-worldwide/ [Google Scholar]
- Dissanayake, A. K. (2017). A case for domain-specific research into seafarers’ use of English as a lingua franca. CINEC Academic Journal, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Yangon, M., Uchida, Y., & Takagi, N. (2012). What did you say?–Why communication failures occur on the radio. International Maritime Lecturers’ Association (IMLA), 170. [Google Scholar]
- Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600-1610. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language learning, 34(1), 65-87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ockey, G. J., & French, R. (2014). From one to multiple accents on a test of L2 listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu060. [Google Scholar]
- Harding, L. (2012). Accent, listening assessment and the potential for a shared-L1 advantage: A DIF perspective. Language Testing, 29(2), 163-180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Butler, Y. G. (2007). How are nonnative-English-speaking teachers perceived by young learners? TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 731-755. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dai, D. W., & Roever, C. (2019). Including L2-English varieties in listening tests for adolescent ESL learners: L1 effects and learner perceptions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16(1), 64-86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S.F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 173-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.