Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 82, 2024
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Methods for Synthesis of New Biologically Active Substances and Their Application in Various Industries of the World Economy – 2023” (MSNBAS2023)
Article Number 02033
Number of page(s) 6
Section Use of Biologically Active Substances in Crop Production, Animal Husbandry and Other Industries
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248202033
Published online 03 January 2024
  • O. Y. Voronkova, I. N. Sycheva, R. N. Shpakova, E. Y. Pashkova, A. L. Poltarykhin. Economic mechanism of regulating land relations in the agricultural sector of Russia. European Research Studies Journal, 21(4), 280-291 (2018). doi:10.35808/ersj/1120 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V.V. Morozov, K.A. Bogdanov, V.A. Smelik, M.S. Volkhonov, V.S. Kukhar. Rationale for the design and technological parameters of the extruder for the production of sapropel and grain feed. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 699(1), 012062 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Kizatova, S. Azimova, G. Iskakova, S. Zheterova, G. Ibadullaуeva. Catalytic Removal of Heavy Metals from Waste Water by Pumpkin Pectin-Containing Nanomaterials-Based Enzyme. Journal of Nanostructures, 12(1), 123-135 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • D.V. Armbrust. Physiological responses to wind and sandblast damage by grain sorghum plants. Agronomy Journal 74, 133-135(1982). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.V. Armbrust. Wind and sandblast injury to field crops: Effect of plant age. Agronomy Journal, 76, 991-993(1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Rampino, S. Pataleo, C. Gerardi, G. Mita, C. Perrota. Drought stress responses in Wheat: Physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant, Cell environ. 29, 2143-2152 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R., Precheur. J.K. Greig, D.V. Armbrust. The effects of wind and wind-plus-sand on tomato plants. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 103, 351-355 (1978). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. Soil Erosion by Wind and Measures for its Control on Agricultural Lands. Agricultural Development Paper No. 71, Food and Agriculture Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 94 (1960). [Google Scholar]
  • H. A. Cleugh, J. M. Miller, M. Böhm, Direct mechanical effects of wind on crops. Agroforestry Systems, 41, 85-112 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Rahmonkulov, X. Dadakhojhaev, X. Mardanov. How to overcome the negative impact of Garmsel on productivity?. “Village Life” July 23 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Tuberose, Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front.Physio, 3, 347-355 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Rahmonkulov, A. Donabaev, X. Jalolov, X. Dadakhodjaev. Methodical guide (recommendation) on selection of cotton varieties resistant to natural blight. Tashkent: “Navroz” publishing house, 32 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Jaenicke, Monitoring and critical review of the estimated source strength of mineral dust from the Sahara. In Christer Morales Saharan Dust. Mobilization. Transport, Deposition (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979) 233-242. [Google Scholar]
  • C.H. Goulden, Modern Methods of Field Experimentation. Scientific Agriculture, 11(10), (1931). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.