Open Access
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 85, 2024
3rd International Conference on Research of Agricultural and Food Technologies (I-CRAFT-2023)
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 3
Section Research of Agricultural and Food Technologies
Published online 09 January 2024
  • H. Zabed, G. Faruq, J.N. Sahu, M.S. Azirun, R. Hashim, A.N. Boyce, Bioethanol production from fermentable sugar juice, Sci. World J., 1-11 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  • E. Khullar, B.S. Dien, K.D. Rausch, M.E. Tumbleson, V. Singh, Effect of particle size on enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated Miscanthus. Industrial crops and products, 44, 11-17 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.A. Dar, E.A. Dar, A. Kaur, U.G. Phutela, Sweet sorghum-a promising alternative feedstock for biofuel production, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 4070–4090 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Kärcher, Y. Iqbal, I. Lewandowski, T. Senn, Bioresource technology, 180, 360-364 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Almodares, M.R. Hadi, M. Ranjbar, R. Taheri, The effects of nitrogen treatments, cultivars and harvest stages on stalk yield and sugar content in sweet sorghum. Asian J. Plant Sci, 6(2), 423-426 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.I. Nazli, Field Crops Research, 280, 108464 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Guigou, C. Lareo, L.V. Pérez, M.E. Lluberas, D. Vázquez, M.D. Ferrari. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(7), 3058-3062 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.S., Wortmann Liska, A.J., Ferguson R.B., Lyon D.J., Klein R.N, I. Dweikat. Agron. J., 102 (1), 319–326 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V.H. Teetor, D.V. Duclos, E.T. Wittenberg, K.M. Young, J. Chawhuaymak, M. R. Riley, D.T. Ray. Ind. Crop. Prod., 34 (2), 1293–1300 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Cifuentes, R. Bressani, C. Rolz. Energy for Sustainable Development, 21, 13–19 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L.K. Rutto, Y. Xu, M. Brandt, S.M.K. Ren, Kering., J. Sustain. Bioenergy Syst., 3(2), 113 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.J. Maw, J.H. Houx III, F.B. Fritschi. Ind. Crop. Prod., 84, 43–49 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.H. Houx III, F.B. Fritschi. Agron. J., 105(6), 1761–1768 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B.V. Reddy, B. Ramaiah, A.A. Kumar, P.S. Reddy. J. SAT Agric. Res., 5(1), 1–3 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  • M.L. Ali, J.F. Rajewski, P.S. Baenziger, K.S. Gill, K.M. Eskridge, I. Dweikat., Mol. Breed., 21(4), 497–509 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.K. Kering, V.W. Temu, L.K. Rutto. J. Sustain. Bioenergy Syst., 7(1), 14 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  • T. Kurai, S.R. Morey, S.P. Wani, T. Watanabe. Eur. J. Agron., 71, 63–72 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.H. Briand, S.B. Geleta, R.J. Kratochvil. Renew. Energy, 129, 328–333 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.