Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 97, 2024
Fifth International Scientific Conference of Alkafeel University (ISCKU 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00021 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249700021 | |
| Published online | 05 April 2024 | |
- S. Liu, Y. Cui, Q. Jiang, Q. Wang, and W. Wu, “An efficient tile size selection model based on machine learning,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 121, pp. 27–41, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2018.06.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Zhao and A. Cohen, “Flextended Tiles,” ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1–25, 2019, DOI: 10.1145/3369382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Zhao and P. Di, “Optimizing the Memory Hierarchy by Compositing Automatic Transformations on Computations and Data,” presented at the 2020 53rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), 2020. [Google Scholar]
- V. Kelefouras, K. Djemame, G. Keramidas, and N. Voros, “An Analytical Model for Loop Tiling Transformation,” in Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2022, ch. Chapter 7, pp. 95–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. Prajapati, W. Ranasinghe, S. Rajopadhye, R. Andonov, H. Djidjev, and T. Grosser, “Simple, Accurate, Analytical Time Modeling and Optimal Tile Size Selection for GPGPU Stencils,” presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- V. Kelefouras, K. Djemame, G. Keramidas, and N. Voros, “A Methodology for Efficient Tile Size Selection for Affine Loop Kernels,” International Journal of Parallel Programming, vol. 50, no. 3-4, pp. 405–432, 2022, DOI: 10.1007/s10766-022-00734-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Li et al., “Analytical cache modeling and tilesize optimization for tensor contractions,” presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- M. M. Riyadh Baghdadi, Mohamed-Hicham Leghettas, Kamel Abdous, Taha Arbaoui, Karima Benatchba, Saman Amarasinghe, “A DEEP LEARNING BASED COST MODEL FOR AUTOMATIC CODE OPTIMIZATION.” [Google Scholar]
- A. M. Malik, “Optimal Tile Size Selection Problem Using Machine Learning,” presented at the 2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Sato, T. Yuki, and T. Endo, “An Autotuning Framework for Scalable Execution of Tiled Code via Iterative Polyhedral Compilation,” ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–23, 2019, DOI: 10.1145/3293449. [Google Scholar]
- A. S.-R. Süreyya Emre, Fabrice Rastello, Ponnuswamy Sadayyapan, “Efficient Tiled Sparse Matrix Multiplication through Matrix Signatures.” [Google Scholar]
- A. B. M. F. Manal, H. Almohammed, Esraa H. Alwan, “Parallel Genetic Algorithm for Optimizing [Google Scholar]
- Compiler Sequences Ordering,” pp. 128–138. [Google Scholar]
- E. H. A. Laith, H. Alhasnawy, and Ahmed B. M. Fanfakh, “Using Machine Learning to Predict the Sequences of Optimization Passes,” 2020, pp. 139–156. [Google Scholar]
- C.-H. Hsu and U. Kremer, “A Quantitative Analysis of Tile Size Selection Algorithms,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- F. Johnson, O. Oluwatobi, O. Folorunso, A. Ojumu, and A. Quadri, “Optimized ensemble machine learning model for software bugs prediction,” in Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, vol. 19, pp. 1–11, 2022, DOI: 10.1007/s11334-022-00506-x. [Google Scholar]
- https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/noorasalam/tile-size-selection [Google Scholar]
- T. Sharma, A. Jatain, S. Bhaskar, and K. Pabreja, “Ensemble Machine Learning Paradigms in Software Defect Prediction,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 199–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.002. [Google Scholar]
- J. M. Cardoso, J. G. F. Coutinho, and P. C. Diniz, “Chapter 5-Source code transformations and optimizations,” in Embedded Computing for High Performance, pp. 137–183, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.