Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 107, 2024
19th International Conference Water and Wastewater: Transportation, Treatment, Management “Yakovlev Readings” (YRC-2024)
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Technology and Organization of Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202410706003
Published online 07 May 2024
  • A. Lapidus, A. Makarov, Fuzzy model of the organization of the construction process. News of universities. Investment. Construction. Realty. 1(20), 59-68, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  • N. Kupchikova, D. Guzhvinsky, Construction tenders and the specifics of their conduct. The era of science. 16,182-186, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  • A. Kamynina Organization and conduct of contract tenders in the construction sector. Naukosphere. 5, 1-3, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  • E. Porfiriev, N. Sokolov, Tender system in construction and its shortcomings. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 10(67), 60-62, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  • J. Hochstetter, C. Cares, C. Vairetti, S. Maldonado, M.G Ojeda. A transparency maturity model for government software tenders. 9, 45668-45682, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  • F. Decarolis, C. Giorgiantonio, Corruption red flags in public procurement: new evidence from italian calls for tenders. EPJ Data Science. 11(1), 1-38, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  • P. Liu, Y. Qiu, J. Hu Tong, Z. Jiejuan, Expert judgments for performance shaping Factors’ multiplier design in human reliability analysis, Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 194, 106343, (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Hokstad, K. Oien, R. Reinertsen, Recommendations on the use of expert judgment in safety and reliability engineering studies. Two offshore case studies, Reliabili Engineering and System Safety. 61, 65–76, (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Klee, The Utilization of Expert Opinion in DecisionMaking, AlChE Journal. 18(6), 1107–1115, (1972) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. M. Cooke, L. L. H. J. Goossens, TU Delft expert judgment data base, Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 93, 657–674, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.D., Beshelev, F.G. Gurvich., Mathematical and statistical methods of expert assessments, M.: Statistics. (1974) [Google Scholar]
  • E. Duizen, Method of expert evaluation: a guide to action, Creative economy. 2(86), 24-34, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  • A. Zagorskaya, A. Lapidus, Application of expert assessment methods in scientific research. The required number of experts, Construction production, 3, 21-34, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  • E. Margolin, Methods of processing expert survey data, Polygraphy. 5, 14-16, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  • V. Postnikov, Analysis of approaches to the formation of the composition of the expert group focused on preparation and decision-making, Science and Education. Moscow: Publishing House of Bauman Moscow State Technical University. 5, 333-346, (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.