Open Access
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 107, 2024
19th International Conference Water and Wastewater: Transportation, Treatment, Management “Yakovlev Readings” (YRC-2024)
Article Number 06011
Number of page(s) 7
Section Technology and Organization of Construction
Published online 07 May 2024
  • GOST 22690-2015. Concretes. Determination of strength by mechanical methods of nondestructive testing [Google Scholar]
  • Savoie Maintenance Service revendeur et réparateur SCHMIDT Hammer (in French) Access mode (accessed 10.25.2023) [Google Scholar]
  • M. Wang, W. Wan, A new empirical formula for evaluating uniaxial compressive strength using the Schmidt hammer test, in International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 123, 104094 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Yagiz, Predicting uniaxial compressive strength, modulus of elasticity and index properties of rocks using the Schmidt hammer, in Bull Eng Geol Environ 68, 55–63 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Ali, R. Haider. A Comparative Evaluation of Indirect Methods to Estimate the Compressive Strength of Limestone (Chorgali Formation), in Conference: International Congress and Exhibition “Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology” . (2017) 10.1007/978-3-319-61931-6_15. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Jahed Armaghani, E. Mohamad, E. Momeni, et al., Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of granite through an expert artificial neural network, in Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 9, 48 (2016) DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-2057-3 [Google Scholar]
  • M. Liang, E.T. Mohamad, R.S. Faradonbeh, et al. Rock strength assessment based on regression tree technique, in Engineering with Computers 32, 343–354 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Hebib, D. Belhai, B. Alloul, Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of North Algeria sedimentary rocks using density, porosity, and Schmidt hardness, in Arab J Geosci 10, 383 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  • K. Karaman, A. Kesimal, A comparative study of Schmidt hammer test methods for estimating the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks, in Bull Eng Geol Environ 74, 507–520 (2015) 07/s10064-014-0617-5 [Google Scholar]
  • A. F. Boyko, E. Y. Kudenikov, The exact method of calculating the required number of repeated experiments, in Bulletin of the Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov, 8, 128-132 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Yang, T. Ng. Hon Keung, Optimal experimental planning for constant-stress accelerated life-testing experiments based on coherent systems, in Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, (2023) DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2023.2196039 [Google Scholar]
  • V.P. Rozhkov, A.L. Neverov Determination of the number of experiments in Razvedka i ohrana nedr, 11, 17-19 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  • J. Taylor, Introduction to the theory of errors. Translation from English. M.: Mir, 272 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  • A.V. Kornilova, Practical guide to processing experimental data / Kornilova A.V., Tet Paing, Zho Zayar, Selishchev A.I., Idarmachev I.M. – M.: Izdatel'skie resheniya, 190 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  • E.S. Ventzel Probability theory. M.: Nauka, 576 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  • Probability and mathematical statistics: Encyclopedia / Ed. Yu.V. Prokhorova. - M.: Bol'shaya rossijskaya enciklopediya. 912, (2003) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.