Comparative Technological Assessment of the Quality Formation of Local and Introduced Varieties of Virginia Flue-cured and Burley Tobaccos

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 122, 2024 2024 9^th International Conference on Energy Efficiency and Agricultural Engineering (EE&AE 2024)


Article Number		01013
Number of page(s)		12
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202412201013
Published online		17 July 2024

M. Sifola, L. Carrino, E. Cozzolino, L. del Piano, G. Graziani, A. Ritieni, Potential of preharvest wastes of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) crops, grown for smoke products, as source of bioactive compounds (phenols and flavonoids). Sustainability 13(4), 2087 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042087 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Z. Tassew, B. Chandravanshi, Levels of nicotine in Ethiopian tobacco leaves. SpringerPlus 4, 649 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1448-y [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
M. Bortolini, M. Gamberi, C. Mora, A. Regattieri, Greening the tobacco flue-curing process using biomass energy: A feasibility study for the flue-cured Virginia type in Italy. Int. J. Green Energy 16(14), 1220–1229 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2019.1671397 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
I. Tabaxi, I. Kakabouki, C. Ζisi, A. Folina, S. Karydogianni, A. Kalivas, D. Bilalis, Effect of organic fertilization on soil characteristics, yield and quality of Virginia tobacco in Mediterranean area. Emir. J. Food Agric. 32(8), 610–616 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i8.2138 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
L. Zou, J. Su, T. Xu, X. Ji, T. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Jiang, B. Hu, Untargeted metabolomics revealing changes in aroma substances in flue-cured tobacco. Open Chem. 21(1), 20220326 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2022-0326 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
C. He, R. Chen, K. Ren, G. Zhao, C. He, B. Hu, C. Zou, Y. Jiang, Y. Chen, A predictive model for the sensory aroma characteristics of flue-cured tobacco based on a back-propagation neural network. SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1–11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03656-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
K. Wei, J. Bin, F. Wang, C. Kang, On-line monitoring of the tobacco leaf composition during flue-curing by near-infrared spectroscopy and deep transfer learning. Anal. Lett. 55(13), 2089–2107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2022.2046021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Upadhyaya, P. Jeet, P. Sundaram, A. Sing, K. Saurabh, M. Deo, Efficacy of drone technology in agriculture: A review. J. AgriSearch 9(3), 189–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v9i03.11000 [Google Scholar]
N. Diana, A. Jamil, Y. Yogi, S. Nugraheni, L. Verona, Improving the production and quality of Virginia tobacco through topping and suckering: A review. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 974, 012020 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/974/1/012020 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
C. Jiang, C. Zu, H. Wang, Y. Yan, Y. Liu, J. Shen, Straw return with biochar increased soil macro-aggregates and improved Flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) yield and quality. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 20(1), 207–219 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2001_207219 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P. Yang, P. Drohan, H. Long, M. Yang, Y. Bian, E. Ma, Water use efficiency, yield and quality of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) using negative pressure irrigation. Ind. Crops Prod. 178, 114552 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114552 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
K. Sarala, K. Rao, C. Nanda, K. Baghyalakshmi, R. Darvishzadeh, K. Gangadhara, J. Rajappa, Abiotic stress resistance in tobacco: advances and strategies, in Genomic Designing for Abiotic Stress Resistant Technical Crops (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), 329–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05706-9_10 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Dadras, H. Sabouri, G. Nejad, A. Sabouri, M. Shoai-Deylami, Association analysis, genetic diversity and structure analysis of tobacco based on AFLP markers. Mol. Biol. Rep. 41, 3317–3329 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3194-6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
T. Radoukova, Y. Dyulgerski, Biological indicators of Bulgarian and introduced Burley tobacco varieties. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 24(6), 1059–1064 (2018). https://www.agrojournal.org/24/06-17.pdf [Google Scholar]
S. Kirkova, Y. Dyulgerski, Physical, technological, chemical and smoking properties of new lines and hybrids Burley tobacco. Tobacco 65(7-12), 65–71 (2015). [Google Scholar]
Z. Tang, L. Chen, Z. Chen, Y. Fu, X. Sun, B. Wang, T. Xia, Climatic factors determine the yield and quality of Honghe flue-cured tobacco. Sci. Rep. 10, 19868 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76919-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Y. Chen, K. Ren, X. He, Y. Chen, B. Hu, X. Hu, J. Li, Y. Jin, Z. Zhao, C. Zou, The response of flue-cured tobacco cultivar K326 to nitrogen fertilizer rate in China. J. Agric. Sci. 158(5), 371–382 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000738 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Sifola, I. Di Mola, E. Cozzolino, L. Ottaiano, G. Piccirillo, L. Del Piano, M. Mori, Yield response, quality traits, and nitrogen-use efficiency of a Burley tobacco crop grown in Mediterranean areas (Southern Italy) as affected by intensive N management. Agronomy 11(9), 1837 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091837 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
L. Verona, Supriyadi, N. Diana, G. Fatah, Virginia tobacco sustainable production in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 974, 012116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/974/1/012116 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R. Bozhinova, Effect of nitrogen rate and foliar fertilization on yield, quality leaf chemistry in Burley tobacco. Bulg. J. Crop Sci. 54(2), 33–39 (2017). https://cropscience-bg.org/page/en/details.php?article_id=472 [Google Scholar]
M. Mutafchieva, N. Tahsin, Economic and chemical indicators of introduced male sterile lines of Burley tobacco. J. Mt. Agric. Balk. 18(4), 774–784 (2015). https://jmabonline.com/en/journal/1311-0489/issue/2015-18-4/ [Google Scholar]
N. Nikolov, V. Nikolova, V. Popova, Complex evaluation of the quality of introduced and local varieties of Virginia flue-cured tobacco in Bulgaria, BIO Web Conf. 45, 01013 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20224501013 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
N. Nikolov, V. Nikolova, V. Popova, D. Drachev, Comparative analysis and complex technological evaluation of Burley tobaccos, imported and produced in South Bulgaria tobacco region. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 27(6), 1147–1152 (2021). https://journal.agrojournal.org/page/en/details.php?article_id=3657 [Google Scholar]
Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Instruction for the Harvesting and Curing of Tobacco from Virginia Variety Group (Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2016). https://www.mzh.government.bg/media/filer_public/2018/02/13/su6-vir-2016.pdf [Google Scholar]
Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Instruction for the Harvesting and Curing of Tobacco from Burley Variety Group (Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2016). https://www.mzh.government.bg/media/filer_public/2018/02/13/su6-byrl-2016.pdf [Google Scholar]
North Carolina State University (NCSU), 2021 Flue-cured Tobacco Guide (NCSU Cooperative Extension Service, NC, USA, 2021). [Google Scholar]
A. Bailey, B. Pearce, Stripping and preparation of tobacco for market, in 2023-2024 Burley and Dark Tobacco Production Guide (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA, 2023), 61–64. https://www2.ca.uky.edu/agcomm/pubs/ID/ID160/ID160.pdf [Google Scholar]
S. Gueorgiev, V. Popova, Developing a system for prognosis of tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Eq. 1, 61–65 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.1999.10819020 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
V. P. Borovikov and I. P. Borovikov, STATISTICA. Statistical Analysis and Data Processing in the Windows Environment (Filin, Moscow, 1998). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.