Examining the use of communal intellectual property as trademarks: A study on legal ambiguities

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 146, 2024 2^nd Biology Trunojoyo Madura International Conference (BTMIC 2024)


Article Number		01043
Number of page(s)		8
Section		Dense Matter
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414601043
Published online		27 November 2024

R. Awopetu, In Defense of Culture: Protecting Traditional Cultural Expressions in Intellectual Property., Emory Law J., 69, 4, 745–779, (2020), Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=143867558&site=eds-live&scope=site. [Google Scholar]
A. Vargas, WIPO’s Proposed Treatment of Sacred Traditional Cultural Expressions as a Distinct Form of Intellectual Property,” 235–271 [Google Scholar]
P. H. Purwandoko, A. Sulistiyono, and M. Hawin, The Implementation of the Traditional Cultural Expression (Tce) Protection in Indonesia Based on Article 38 Law Number 28 of 2014 Regarding Copyright, Indones. J. Int. Law, 18, 4, 543–570, (2021), doi: 10.17304/iiil.vol18.4.823 [Google Scholar]
S. Nghihalwa, Analysis, A N The, O F Of, Registration Names, Traditional Product Cultural, Other As, Expressions, (2014) [Google Scholar]
Indiakanoon, Section 60(1) in The Trade Marks Act, 1999, 1, 65193519, (1999), Available: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1553048/ [Google Scholar]
F. N. Hanifah and A. Muliawan, Implementasi Penerapan Penafsiran Hakim Tentang Pelanggaran Unsur Bertentangan Dengan Kewajiban Pegawai Negeri Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, JCA Law, 1, 1, 117–127, (2020), Available: https://jca.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/13 [Google Scholar]
Cecep Cahya Supena, Manfaat Penafsiran Hukum Dalam Rangka Penemuan Hukum, Moderat Jurnal Ilm. Ilmu Pemerintah., 8, 2, 427–435, (2022), doi: 10.25157/moderat.v8i2.2714 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Hukum, O. Sahbani, Menkumham Ingatkan Prinsip Kehati-hatian Terkait Penolakan Paten-Merek. (2021), Available: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/menkumham-ingatkan-prinsip-kehati-hatian-terkait-penolakan-paten-merek-lt60a5574b4afec/?page=1 [Google Scholar]
T. Somal, Attars and Agarbattis: Protecting Traditional Cultural Expressions through Non-Conventional Trademarks.” SpicyIP, (2021), Available: https://spicyip.com/2021/07/attars-and-agarbattis-protecting-traditional-cultural-expressions-through-non-conventional-trademarks.html [Google Scholar]
N. K. S. Dharmawan et al., Quo Vadis Traditional Cultural Expressions Protection: Threats from Personal Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence, Law Reform J. Pembaharuan Huk., 19, 2, 321–343, (2023), doi: 10.14710/lr.v19i2.58639 [Google Scholar]
R. Njatrijani, Defensive Protectiontraditional Cultural Expresions (TCE) Masyarakat di Kabupaten Blora, Law, Dev. Justice Rev., 1, 1, 39–68, (2018), doi: 10.14710/ldjr.v1i1.3572 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
T. Berlianty, Y. Hetharie, and P. Anggia, Legal Protection of Bambu Gila Dance as a Traditional Cultural Expression, Yuridika, 39, 1, 43–78, (2024), doi: 10.20473/ydk.v39i1.48389 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. P. Putri, Reog and Its Possession in Preserving Cultural Identity in Central Java, Indonesia, Proc. English Lang. Teaching, Lit. Transl., 11, 1, 67–76, (2022) [Google Scholar]
S. R. Argiandini, S. Sumarwati, and R. Suhita, Symbolic Meaning and Local Wisdom Education of the Traditional Performing Arts Reog Ponorogo,” Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Soc. Sci., 2, 2, 83–96, (2023), doi: 10.59188/icss.v2i2.148 [Google Scholar]
M. Djulaeka and M. Zulkifli, Local Goverment and Traditional cultural Expression Protection,” 226, 103, 1264–1269, (2020), doi: 10.2991/icss-18.2018.266 [Google Scholar]
D. Kumalasari, Nuzulia, M. Khoidin, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, Protection and Characteristics of Geographical Indications in Indonesia, Am. J. Arts Hum. Sci., 2, 2, (2023), doi: 10.54536/ajahs.v2i2.1515 [Google Scholar]
L. Olteanu, Riding on the Coat-Tails of Traditional Cultural Expressions, Springer Netherlands, 34, 3, (2021) [Google Scholar]
A. Maze, Geographical indications as global knowledge commons: Ostrom’s law on common intellectual property and collective action, J. Institutional Econ., 31, 494–510, (2023), doi: 10.1017/S1744137423000036 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
C. E. Hernandez and L. Granados, Quality differentiation of cocoa beans: implications for geographical indications, J. Sci. Food Agric., 101, 10, 3993–4002, (2021), doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11077 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F. Wulandari, E. Suparman, M. R. A. Palar, and M. Amirulloh, Sui generis system: GI protection for the herbal product in Indonesia as communal property right, Cogent Soc. Sci., 9, 1, (2023), doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2176989 [Google Scholar]
I. Lukito, Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Mendorong Potensi Indikasi Geografis (Studi pada Provinsi Kepulauan Riau), J. Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., 12, 3, 313, (2018), doi: 10.30641/kebijakan.2018.v12.313-330 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Sujatmiko, Legal Principles of Trademark Protection in Supporting Improvement of Creative Economic Industry*, Talent Dev. Excell., 12, 3, 1525–1535, (2020), Available: http://www.iratde.com [Google Scholar]
F. Is’ad and B. A. Riswandi, LEGAL PROTECTION FOR WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARK BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SPANISH (Case Study between Lois and NewLois), JIPRO J. Intellect. Prop., 5, 2, (2022), doi: 10.20885/jipro.vol5.iss2.art5 [Google Scholar]
D. S. Wijanarko and Slamet Pribadi, Preventive Legal Protection of Trademarks in Indonesia Based on Law Number 20 Of 2016 Concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, J. Law, Polit. Humanit., 3, 1, 227–235, (2023), doi: 10.38035/jlph.v3i1.161 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
D. O. Susanti, A. Efendi, and N. K. Sari, The Model Of Legal Protection For Products Of Genetic Engineering In Agricultural Technology, Trunojoyo Law Rev., 1, 1, 30–45, (2019), doi: 10.21107/tlr.v1i1.5255 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Shuhufi and Firdayanti, A Comparative Analysis of Trademark Rights Protection,” Mazahibuna, 5, 1, 18–38, (2023), doi: 10.24252/mh.vi.33009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.