Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 166, 2025
2025 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices (ICBEMD 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Medical Information and Technological Innovation Research | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202516602004 | |
| Published online | 10 March 2025 | |
- M. V. Romalis, J. Wiedemann, S. Zhang, and N. Dural, “Vapor cell Rydberg atom electrometry with time-separated fields,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05106, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- J. Wang, W. Fan, K. Yin, Y. Yan, B. Zhou, and X. Song, “Combined effect of pump-light intensity and modulation field on the performance of optically pumped magnetometers under zero-field parametric modulation,” Physical Review A, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 053427, 05/19/, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Kamada, Y. Ito, and T. Kobayashi, “Human MCG measurements with a high-sensitivity potassium atomic magnetometer,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1063–1071, Jun, 2012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- L. Li, J. Tang, B. Zhao, L. Cao, B. Zhou, and Y. Zhai, “Single-beam triaxial spin-exchange relaxation-free atomic magnetometer utilizing transverse modulation fields,” Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics, vol. 55, no. 50, Dec 15, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- X. Li, B. Han, K. Zhang, Z. Liu, S. Wang, Y. Yan, and J. Lu, “All-optical dual-axis zero-field atomic magnetometer using light-shift modulation,” Physical Review Applied, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 014023, 01/16/, 2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. P. Krzyzewski, A. R. Perry, V. Gerginov, and S. Knappe, “Characterization of noise sources in a microfabricated single-beam zero-field opticallypumped magnetometer,” Journal of applied physics, vol. 126 4, pp. 044504, 2019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J. Tang, Y. Zhai, B. Zhou, B. Han, and G. Liu, “DualAxis Closed Loop of a Single-Beam Atomic Magnetometer: Toward High Bandwidth and High Sensitivity,” Ieee Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 70, 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Ding, J. Yuan, G. Lu, Y. Li, and X. Long, “ThreeAxis Atomic Magnetometer Employing Longitudinal Field Modulation,” Ieee Photonics Journal, vol. 9, no. 5, Oct, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- J. C. Allred, R. N. Lyman, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, “High-Sensitivity Atomic Magnetometer Unaffected by Spin-Exchange Relaxation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 13, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. P. Ledbetter, I. M. Savukov, V. M. Acosta, D. Budker, and M. V. Romalis, “Spin-exchangerelaxation-free magnetometry with Cs vapor,” Physical Review A, vol. 77, no. 3, 2008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- X. Li, Z. Guo, R. Yang, and Y. Feng, “Single-Beam Double-Pass Miniaturized Atomic Magnetometer for Biomagnetic Imaging Systems,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 12433–12440, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Yan, K. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Liu, X. Li, Y. Zhou, and J. Lu, “In-situ magnetic fields monitoring and compensation for zero-field atomic magnetometers,” Measurement, vol. 239, pp. 115410, 2025/01/15/, 2025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Lee, Ultra-High Sensitivity Atomic Magnetometers, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- A.-N. Xu, J. Peng, Y. Yin, and B. Liu, “Single-Beam Atomic Magnetometer Enhanced With Elliptically Polarized Reflected Light,” IEEE Sensors Journal, pp. 1–1, 2024. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.